<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>Originally posted by GM:
When taking the pharagraps out of the context i used, when answering you, it only give broken up nonsense.
Read them in relation to the order that they where presented.
And i will try to clarify for you:

§257, about favorite remedies, read this in relation to §258, who states, " a god dr, do not because of misbelive , avoid using a certain remedie, because he of his own faults and wrong use, has come to dislike it.

You state, that i have given referece to that camphor was mentioned in organon, thats completely wrong, and this you should know, if not reading organon for the first time.

You referr to §167, and state that this was a acute case, well i have to ask, do acute cases last three years?
Your answer is irrellevant to the case.

§110, is linked to camphor, and is a fault, as i have never expressed that.

§249, 167, the pharagraphs does not contain any grading of symptomes, that can be used as evaluation of degree of severety of the case, this is a individual observation, based upon my own experiences, according to §141-fotnote 85.

§254, The paragrahp does not evaluate the power of observation, perseption, or ability to observe the case, or understand it, all this is individual, one will person use several months to find a remedy, while Hahnemann needed only minutes.

§264, does not state "using of genuine medicines" that is a interpretion, it states the duty to know the origin and power of the remedy.
§265, is a sound advice, and a part of §264.

§251 repetition of homeopatic highpotences ref §111. In context to your comment here, read §247 correctly applied in acucte cases, what this is not, and x30 of camphora,, is to be resembled with x12 in other remedies, it works only 12 houers, a second dose, will do several things, slow down and also take a underlying layer.

And your misconception about to large dosages, first of all, three pills is not a large dose, secondly, when Hanemannn referrs to large doses, he talk about crude substances, materiell doses, if homeopatic, it is mothertincture he talks about, and not D(x) potences, except for those who is to near toxicality.
§276 fotnote 129 confirms that (this is a common misconception).

About your earlier statement of camphora not being appropriate in this case, i referr to §155-156, and §153

And if you want to get confirmation on my powers of observing, ask the patient as i recomended, that he reports back to you, so you with your own eyes see what happens, and get it confirmed what i do.

And ill bet hes a calcium carb, constitutional.

Also, about your waiting, read §249 fotnote110.

§270-fotnote126, if acute as you seem to belive this case is, this confims repitition of the doses.
In no way, can there be said, that organon, contraindicate my choice of camphora in this case as a antidote.
This is my opinion.
And you may have the last word, if you like it, ill stop the discussion here, i find no need for bringing it further, you either investigate with other sources, that my wuews is correct or wrong, or leave it at this, or at your liking.
I find no more time to argue unneded, as this becomes a free educational service for students.

This is my opinion.
Thank you.
GM

<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
hello GM...sorry to be a cause of argument between u and MR&gt; PANNAKAL......but i d like to state that i had this problem of dryness arising much before i started to take kali mur...i had got this dryness problem 3and half yrs back ...then it went away by it self and now since the past yr its devloped again ......i havent used camphora or any other medicine suggested by u as yet ....cause i had got a little confused after readind ure discussion......once again sorry for the trouble

I only written the contend of the aph. you mentioned formerly in the last reply .and I didn't tell that this case is an acute case(Ionly told taht aph167 is about acute case)and the quoted aph. by you is not standing for your point .
any way I am agaist this method of practise and you have every right to do your way.
I am stopping here as this will not end and I alreay expresed my view.
I have no doubt in your love and dedication to homoeopathy and now
gooodbye
pannakkal

Relax,your not the cause to this discussion, the discussion, itself, reveals other more human reasons for this discussion..mans qualitys you know, and that do not imply that im free for faults, but i try at least to be observant of them, after Hahnemanns advice.

It was that i felt ( the dryness had nothing to do with the remedies)when prescribing camphora, and you should not have silicea symptomes, several months after silicea, if getting them during silicea, and they are old reocurring symptomes it confirms silicea as correct, but the potence is a little too low, and that is ok, but if new symptomes never had before, silicea is wrong, and need to be stopped, there is several ways to do this, one dose silicea x12 is sufficient to stop it, but you have used others too, and i wanted to try to take away possile symptomes from them too if they where ther, and it may be sufficient with only on dose of camphora x30, remember i wrote " up to max three times", and that is if the first do not take all, after this to retake the case and prescribe from that, the correct remedie, and clinically, misuse of laxatives, gives only a few choices, 1st is hydrastis, 2nd nux v, 3 opium, 4 bry, etc, so according to this, do as i prescribe.


------------------
Homeopat MNNH Geir E.T. Marcussen
email: getm@eunet.no
http://www.homeopati.no

Hello jasmine,
please don't feel hurt .this is not argument .here you can see only different ways of thinking .as the Drs are also different individual there will be every chance for various ways of thinking.
GM and I did it positivily here without argument or personal attack ,we expressed our views .
so don't afraid to ask questions .
pannakkal