![]() |
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Are you capable of explaining how you think allopathic medicine has murdered 50-100 billion people? It is only estimated that about 70 billion people have died in the last 2700 years, so do you suggest virtually all of them were "murdered" by allopathic medicine? Quote:
Trial shows that homoeopathic arnica is no better than placebo -- Mayor 326 (7384): 303 -- BMJ This study showed placebo to be more effective than arnica. Double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial of homoeopathic arnica C30 for pain and infection after total abdominal hysterectomy. We need to keep in mind is there's an element of chance involved in these trials. No one trial is proof of an effective treatment. When you look at all the trials testing arnica against placebo the majority indicate no difference. A few indicate better results from one or the other but this is because of statistical probability. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
Notice that your therapeutic formula (i.e., an accurate disease diagnosis equals an effective therapy) doesn't contain the word cure. Uh oh, you're not going to like how I slam into you here. Ready, set, go. Since the primary if not sole purpose of both physicians and medicine is to cure, what's wrong with this picture, sir? Now, I actually said it accurately, so watch this. It is impossible for there to be specific drugs for allopathically defined diseases because they're inaccurate descriptions of diseases in the first place. This goes on and on, but I'd rather not explain it if you got it. Did you get that? [Edited Addition: He didn't get it, the moron. Of course, he's obviously a God-damned allopath [[advocate of allopathy as it turns out]], so the moron naturally wouldn't understand anything about medicine, would he? Watch for expertise in sophistry and obscuration coupled with distortion because it's basically all they ever do -- the morons!] Quote:
As for the estimate, I don't care. Arcane archives have never been wrong. Get some. [Edited Addition: Notice how he also used the number 2700 years. That's as far back into history as we can go about medicine because God-damned Pauline Christians destroyed everything throughout the Fertile Crescent, everything in the Americas and everything else they ever got their slimy hands on. More importantly, though, the beginning of Greek medicine can be traced to 2700 years ago. However, the Greeks got everything they knew from the ancient Egyptians, and they all said so, too. I'll bet this moron doesn't know that because all he has is the "teacha tole me" krap of his kind, and academics are generally totally ignorant of history. Notice how he'll readily admit it, too. Those morons hold that civilization started 5000 years ago in Mesopotamia. How many thousands of things have proven that to be a total lie? Several, but jackasses like this bozo don't know even one of them because they just love to exhibit the idiotic servility of things taught them by total fools, and they're proud of it, too. They actually hang diplomas that prove they expertly acquiesced to all of the half-truths and lies they were taught. That's pretty pitiful and pathetic, isn't it? I know the kind of scumbag I'm talking to because I've encounted these big-horned monsters for decades. I'll play just to expose him, but this kind of exercise is futile since they have a vested interest in sustaining mass murder by physicians because it's very profitable to them. I'll then just ignore him since he's already demonstrating he's a total waste of space who'd be far better off dead. Let's hope it's soon and that he stays in Hell this time, eh?] Quote:
Ready, set, go. I don't give a damn what studies show. I can cure. Can you? Obviously not or you'd be a homeopath, wouldn't you? Are we done yet? I mean, this is revolting to me. How do I get you to go away? Quote:
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Hi Albert! Long time, no see. Still your old frothing self. ehhh?
![]() Quote:
Quote:
Here is my definition of a certain medical system: An archaic idea of disease, based on willful ignorance about the inner functions of the body, and using medicines based on willful ignorance about physics. Did you get that? Quote:
Quote:
Claim of OTC homeopathy: "If you take this paticular remedy, you will cure this particular disease." Sounds familiar? ... Yep, totally plagiarizing 'allopathy'. Why do YOU even think of defending that? However, if it claims to work in the same mode as 'allopathy', it should also lend itself to same tests as 'allopathy'. Hans
__________________
<i>You have a right to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.</i> |
|
|||||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Hans
__________________
<i>You have a right to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.</i> |
|
|||||||||||||
|
Yes, but are you familiar with their insoluble problems when you plug in the hokum of false descriptions of diseases and wrongly, insanely assume that chemical drugs can ever possibly be transformed into actual remedies plus all of the other errors of allopathic medicine? I think not or you wouldn't insanely defend mass murder by physicians, would you? "Dumb, dumb, dumb" (Beethoven).
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
No, you couldn't. Suck on dynamite, #######. Better, try to smoke it. Go away! Yeah, well, accurate medical facts don't come on the back of Cracker Jack boxes, you moron. Your heroes say exactly the opposite about all viral infections, all chronic diseases and all psychiatric maladies; viz., they can't cure them. If they say they can't, and you say they can, who should we believe? Go get some medical books. Go away! Quote:
Shut up, you ignorant moron! Go tell your lies to other fools like you, but stay in that sandbox this time, okay? Go away! Get dead! Lie, lie, lie . . . that's all these morons ever do. Total ignorance does that to a person, though, you know? Link: KENT1390, "paralysis agitans." That's what we called it before you ######### and your murderous heroes decided to change the name of it. Fancy skill: Name diseases. No cures, but your heroes are certainly experts at naming diseases even though none of them are even remotely accurate descriptions of reality, and acquiescence to this endless hokum by fools like you constantly proves you're insane, a ########, dangerously ignorant and whatnot. I repeat (link: living with Scoliosis), "Without any exceptions whatsoever, every drug listed in our reliable repertories under disease-diagnostic categories are there solely because cases of them have been cured with those drugs -- without exceptions!" Shut up, you ignorant moron! Go tell your lies to other fools like you somewhere else. I don't care where. Go to the Moon. Go to Hell. Go back to Hell. Go play with yourself. Go sit on your thumb. Go fly a kite. I don't care what you do, but do it elsewhere, ########. Go away! Get dead! Translation: "Keep giving us trillions of dollars a year to keep us billionaires and multi-millionaires and to keep all of you 6.5 billion morons foder for our greed. Keep up your hope in us. I know we've been asking this for thousands of years without any cures, but do keep up the hope, and definitely keep sending us your money, for we love to spend it, you morons." Shut up, ########! Go away! Get dead! Go back to Hell! Notice, too, that s/he's quite illiterate to be writing at the ninth-grade level. He below says he's going to become an engineer. That means he's either in undergraduate work or is still in high school. Who wants to bet he's in the ninth grade? Sir, do you think you can argue insane views with a Hahnemannian homeopathic physician and get away with it when those insane views sustain mass murder by physicians? Sign of the times. I am not your mommy or your daddy, fool. If you say krap in my presence, per the Golden Rule, I will destroy you. Again, shut up, ########! go away! get dead! go back to Hell! Quote:
Let's briefly expose this krap. This should take about ten seconds. What does that tell you? Ready, set, go. They only know 10% of human physiology, so how the hell could they possibly know the cause of any disease? Hey, we don't need to go any further, do we? We will, though. They can't cure, so why listen to people who tell us they're quacks (by definition, "therapeutic incompetents")? That's good enough, methinks. Socrates just poked his head through the wall and nodded, and there's Shakespeare with the same reaction. Good enough for me. Watch this moron fail to perceive it, though. "They see but do not perceive" (Christ). Quote:
Quote:
Uh oh, let's not go that direction any further, though. Notice that these morons constantly dismiss what they call "anecdotal evidence." Wow, caught ya! No, lazy one. Go find them for yourself, ########! Quote:
Go talk to your heroes, you ignorant fool. Go away! Waste somebody else’s time with your stupid remarks and outrageous ignorance of homeopathy and medicine and yet having opinions. If somebody tells you that the sky’s actually purple, what are you going to do? Who cares what morons think? Go away! Quote:
Yeah, I can perceive that in this posting. It was the even temperament that confused me. They also think it's just an intellectual discussion, though. No, Jethro. Christ kicked you people out of the Temple and is removing you dangerously ignorant fools from the planet as we speak and over the next 1000 years, so it's not an intellectual discussion. You're ignorantly supporting mass murder, and I don't. It's that simple, and your opinions don't matter because you can't defend any of them. Go away. I promise that I won't think ill of you if you simply go away and don't bother us again. Quote:
From my manuscript material: Quote:
You have a lot of God-damned gall to suggest we're equals, fool. Guess what, Jethro? Nobody in the George Vithoulkas school of thought (GVs) can keep my company, but they're at least 12 years ahead of you, probably closer to 100 given that you haven't even begun to reexamine your medical views and they're already at the jumping-off point into legitimate, real, pure, true, classical, Hahnemannian homeopathy. You're my equal, but you're a total #######? Clever sophistry, Bubba. A discussion, and yet you babble? Fancy dictionary, Bubba. Look up #######, and it will say to see you. Go away and have a discussion with your ####### from the inside. I'm sure it has lots of wisdom to impart to you. Listen up, mongrel boy. I told you that I'll have no more truck with you because you're either a mass murderer or an insane advocate of it -- the latter, as it turns out -- but I'll give you one chance to retain my attention and love. After all, I would otherwise just ignore you, wouldn't I? In fact, I'll bet your father and mother did that to you, and that's why you insanely want to go into engineering, right? Go here: Homoeopathic Hospital? to posting #23. Accurately and fully answer all of those questions and accurately and fully address all of those issues. If you do, we'll talk more. (That will surely keep him busy until he permanently goes back to Hell. What do you think?) Again, I will not talk to mass murderers and their advocates, and I would willingly be the person who executes all of you for your crimes. Did you get it that time? Go away! Everyone else, God bless!
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B |
|
|||||||
|
Yeah, I've repeatedly noticed that you've never read my stuff, so shut up, go away and get dead, you useless moron and advocate of mass murder by physicians! I repeat, he's from QuackBusters, and he's a God-damned Nux-vomica patient (link: Nux vomica w/o irritability?, posting #45). He's on the payroll of God-damned billionaires and multi-millionaires with trillions of dollars at stake every year, so of course they want to sustain that racket, i.e., that racketeering -- a crime! To do that, they have to destroy homeopathy because it's the only real threat since everything else is also quackery because they also can't cure. It is, however, inevitable that the destruction of allopathic medicine's involvement in diseases will cease come the next Great Plague. Hans still wants horns. Who is surprised?
Quote:
Quote:
That's Moon talk, right? It means something, right? It would have been more helpful if you spoke that in your own language so that we could more easily laugh at the moron you see in the mirror: "liajtr aa oa soilufsa, ja wowqruilqi gfa h agfqa." Yeah, I got that, Hans. Better: Hans, well done. Just what I wanted, you moron. Now, shut up, fool! Notice how that was an expert demonstration in sophistry and obscuration typical of Nux-vomica patients. Specifically, notice how he completely deflected the fact. Some fool in LaLa Land thinks the moron MRC Hans made a comprehensible statement even though he didn't. In fact, he didn't say anything. It's an irrefutable fact that if you have your definitions and basic assumptions totally wrong, your conclusions and the practices that result from them are going to be fouled up. That's the History of Science 101. It's undeniable, but he deflected it with expert sophistry and obscuration. In effect, he tried to say it's not true, but he didn't go that far because he knows he'd be caught lieing. Like I said when trying to explain Nux-vomica patients (link: Nux vomica w/o irritability?, posting #45), Quote:
Quote:
Yeah, they do, but it's servility and brainwashing that actually sustain allopathic medicine. They essentially go, "Ma'am, will you accept the existence of doctors without cures if we mesmerize you with gibberish and wear white coats?" "Sure!" Keep defending that, Hans, you super-moron. "They would soon run out of patients"? No, they take decades doing it because they're experts at it in a God-damned blood cult of inadvertent human sacrafice. Show us your pride in it, Hans. Grow those horns even bigger, you evil moron. Quote:
Folks, notice his sly technique of distortion there, which goes hand-in-hand with his and their equally evil techniques of sophistry and obscuration. He said that "most cases" don't end up in death, but that's not what I said, is it, you long-horned monster from Hell? [Edited Addition: Actually, I did say that, so I add a note four paragraphs down.] I said they kill 97-98% of their patients, and that's a fact they also admit to without anyone noticing because they're obviously all brainwashed morons to not hear these extraordinary admissions we've always said about allopaths. They push and push at their ignorant and servile victims with poisons, the knife and ray gun until their organism simply can't take that onslaught anymore, and then it generally convulses until somebody signs papers allowing allopathic monsters to kill them with large doses of a barbiturate. Incidentally, that's the American death, folks. You all sign off on it (i.e., approve of it), too, by having allopathic physicians, allowing our government to give money to any allopathic institutions and -- way down the list of such national sins -- even listening to those self-admitted quacks ("therapeutic incompetents"). That's pretty dumb, isn't it? I mean, it makes virtually everyone complicit in mass murder by physicians. Yeah, that's pretty dumb, Jethro and Elly May. Some people don't sign those papers, though, and some iatrogenic ("physician-induced") deaths are irrefutable cases of manslaughter because allopathic medicine is inherently dangerous and deadly and increasingly so from more and more interactions with the quacks. Who is surprised? MRS Hans, you thought I'd miss that, didn't you? You are a true wolf in sheep's clothing, and I know you lots better than you know yourself, you monster! Link: Nux vomica w/o irritability?, posting #45. [Edited Addition: Actually, I did say that, and it's accurate. This is yet another example of where allopathic definitions are totally wrong -- all of them! It also proves that allopaths are (as Harris Coulter brilliantly put it in DIVIDED LEGACY: A HISTORY OF THE SCHISM IN MEDICAL THOUGHT, Vol. III) "anti-historical." They define a case as a disease, not an ill person. These dangerously ignorant morons therefore insanely believe (emphasis) that a person can have a cold, then flu, then gastritis, then gastric ulcers, then pancreatitis, then pancreatic cancer, then hearth disease, then a series of heart attacks, then skin cancer, then Hodskin's disease, then lupus, then . . . ad infinitum, and they're all supposedly separate cases. No, you morons! A case is an ill person, and they remain a case until fully cured. If we ignore that cure only happens through legitimate homeotherapeutics and that full cure is quite beyond the wildest imaginings of people who're unfamiliar with homeopathy, for it includes actual mental freedom, we get to ask about the definition of "a case," why is this not obvious? Don't worry, they won't respond. We prove them wrong at all turns, but they never admit it. Why did MRS Hans do this, though? I mean, it looks like intentional distortion, doesn't it? Yeah, buddy! He's expert at it, too. I repeat, he's a God-damned Nux-vomica patient (link: http://www.otherhealth.com/homeopath...lity-5.html).] Quote:
I "cannot show any difference," huh? Liar, liar, liar! I've done little more than exactly that the entire time I've been posting here, and my postings are often as long as papers published in homeopathic medical journals. Folks, let me explain why he said that. Nux-vomica patients are really sly devils. He's attempting to suck me into another series of debates. When he first started posting here, which started because I posted elsewhere and encountered this monster from the deep and he then followed me back here (I'm sorry!), we caught him lieing at least 50 times. God knows how many lies he's told since then, but I'm srue it's a lot because it's basically the only thing he does. The last time I barfed on this fool, we discovered he's part of QuackBusters. He never responds to any facts we present him. He's never tested homeopathy. In fact, he's paid to disrupt homeopathic forums. Who pays him? Billionaires and multi-millionaires because they know they're done for come a Great Plague since only we can cure them. They're criminals, and it will eventually be discovered that they're directly responsible for mass murder, so they're actively trying to destroy homeopathy's resurgance. Do you think humanity will allow that to happen? They don't care. In fact, they have no morality whatsoever. All of those people are agnostics. As such, they believe that it simply doesn't matter what happens after they're dead. Therefore, they can do things that will destroy the planet within a century without it bothering them in the slightest. They can sustain a very profitable system of medicine of doctors without cures who create the very diseases they can't cure and who kill all of their patients and a medical system that's directly responsible for all of the horrors of industrial chemistry without it bothering them in the slightest. They can buy and own every politician without it bothering them in the slightest. They can create wars for profit without it bothering them in the slightest. They can maintain control over entire economies and create crises when social advancements proceed without it bothering them in the slightest, and they do that because they know that servile populations will willingly surrender their civil rights for pretended security against threats. That's what Herman Goering said at the Nuremberg trials. To whit: Quote:
Yeah, that fits a future demon from Hell. Keep it up, you moron. I will soon again totally ignore you and see to it that you stay the hell away from me on this forum, but I'm not quite through with you this time, you mongrel. Eat some more dog food before you respond, Fido. Everyone else, God bless!
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B |
|
||||
|
I'm waiting for them to allow my responses through. Wouldn't it be a shame if they destroyed them? Imagine the writings of any previous Hahnemannians being destroyed by allopaths. What would happen? How would you like not having some of the writings we have from previous Hahnemannians and discovering that other supposed homeopaths destroyed them? That's what they do here. I'm still waiting for them to justify this, too. Who wants to guess that they'll pass on it and take pot luck at the proverbial Heavenly Tribunal? Uh oh, that's not smart. I'm waiting.
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Homeopathy Vs Allopathy | j tikari | Homeopathy List Discussion | 29 | 31st October 2009 04:09 PM |
| Allopathy and Homeopathy often has to work together ! | Wim | Pets and Animals | 1 | 27th January 2009 03:08 PM |
| Allopathy Vs Homeopathy Part II | Dr. MAS | Homeopathy Discussion | 11 | 24th October 2008 03:07 PM |
| allopathy and homeopathy the contrasting chart | g.tyler | Homeopathy List Discussion | 0 | 3rd September 2005 04:17 PM |