A further item is in respect of the latest technology - nanotechnology . These items are designed to be injected into the body and destroy ONLY the cells that cause cancer, diabetes , etc.
Another semi mechanical approach to medicine. One that ignores the basis of homeopathy – that conditions [disease] start in the non material energy/vitality/spirit element of the individual.
If this is successful does it disprove the foundation of Homeopathy?. Or in killing the material manifestations of the body is it likely to destroy the NON-material spirit and thus that which animates the body and keeps it alive?. Interesting philosophical question!.

Interesting. All moleular structures emit its own specific chracteristic spectrum on excitation (specific light/colour on heating. Somewhat resembles with so called "Soul" or "Sprit") & so should be able to influence anything/anybody acordingly & specifically. But, how to trap & store this chracteristic spectrum as information of raw remedy substances on carriers is not clearly understood because it can't be possible under current scientific understandings since this is instant emission which travel at the speed of light.

__________________
Homeopathic & Biochemic system existed because Drs.Hahnemann & Schuessler thought differently.
Successful people don't do different things, they do things differently..Shiv Khera

Excellent, Kayveeh! I notice you have actually learnt something .

QUOTE=kayveeh:

Interesting. All moleular structures emit its own specific chracteristic spectrum on excitation

Almost right, however, "molecular structures" is not quite corect: The emission is characteristic for the atoms that comprise the structure. Depending on the actual compound, you may or may not be able to infer the molecular structure from that.

(specific light/colour on heating. Somewhat resembles with so called "Soul" or "Sprit") & so should be able to influence anything/anybody acordingly & specifically.

We are talking about simple EM emissions, so the comparison to "soul" or "spirit" appears to be a bit far-fetched. Also, you must realise that to make something emit light on heating, you will have to heat it to temperatures that are destructive to most compounds.

But, how to trap & store this chracteristic spectrum as information of raw remedy substances on carriers is not clearly understood because it can't be possible under current scientific understandings since this is instant emission which travel at the speed of light.

Correct! Not only that, but we also lack a mode of exitation that might cause the emission in the first place; heat is out of the question for the process of succussion as it cannot produce more than minute amounts of heat (and the heat needed for emission would destroy nearly all crude substances), and this leaves us with various kinds of energetic radiation, which also seems unlikely.

Nevertheless, you seem to be moving towards a better understanding of physics.

Hans

__________________
You have a right to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.

I think that even without nanotechnology, homeopaths need to recognize that diseases can have physical causes, and can be cured by physical intervention.

At the philosophical level, one might say that Hahnemann, to a degree, put the chart before the horse when he theorized that health worked through the Vital Force. With our present knowledge, it would be more useful to surmise that the Vital Force might act on the physical processes.

Thus the VF could be seen as a, possibly spiritual, force that can influence and change the physical processes of the body, including those of disease.

This then leads to the possibility of some non-material properties of remedies that might influence the Vf, and thus induce cure of diseases.

In that way we might explain the coexistence of material (conventional) medicines that are obviously able to cure certain diseases, and the homeopathic regimen that works on the same diseases through an immaterial channel, so instead of two contradicting regimens, we can see them as supplemental.

Hans

__________________
You have a right to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.