otherhealth.com  

Go Back   otherhealth.com > Homeopathy > Research and the Scientific Validity of Homeopathy

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13th January 2009, 08:57 PM
Gina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,423
Gina is an unknown quantity at this point
Default Discovery of Homeopathy

Hahnemann's Discovery of Homeopathy

Where Hahnemann got his ideas from.
He mentions no-one from the medical past except Albrecht von Haller (1708-77), and strangest of all he never even mentions Paracelsus (1493-1541), who is most widely regarded as the originator of a form of homoeopathy ie. a system of medicine based almost exclusively upon the law of similars and small doses............................................. ....


"..in the last three thousand five hundred years, not one single physician, to my knowledge...has come upon this so natural, so absolutely necessary, so uniquely valid proving of the pure, characteristic action of medicines..." called Homeopathy........................................ ..............................
__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 14th January 2009, 12:17 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,218
MRC_Hans is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

The idea of similar cures similar has been around for a couple of thousand years, but Hahnemann invented potentization.

Hans
__________________
You have a right to your own opinion, but not to your own facts.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 26th January 2009, 05:34 AM
Hahnemannian444's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 931
Hahnemannian444 has a little shameless behaviour in the past
Default Wrong about Paracelsus, dear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina View Post
. . . strangest of all, he never even mentions Paracelsus (1493-1541), who is most widely regarded as the originator of a form of homoeopathy, i.e., a system of medicine almost exclusively based upon the Law of Similars and small doses.
No, dear, that’s not true. Paracelsus was a quack. His function in the world was to integrate the disparate secret schools of the day, not to reform medicine. He only incidentally did that, but he didn’t do a good job of it because everything he said about medicine was a bunch of gobbledygoop. Moreover, he never actually wrote anything. He was this sort of charismatic, super-star brain of the day with a following of students and the Church, state and allopathic physicians constantly looking to kill him, which they eventually did by hiring an assassin to throw him off a cliff. Typical of follower-mentality types, they hung on every word and wrote them down, but he had nothing to say about medicine worth reading. His main thing was the so-called “doctrine of signatures.” Get this. He reasoned that if some root looked like something, it must be good for that illness. What? Better, ah . . . Ruff! He was quite a ridiculous guy whenever he said anything about medicine, and I mean in the extreme, so it’s a very bad idea to invoke him as the predecessor of Hahnemann. I know that lots of people do that, but (chuckling) you should remember this and note that they’re not worth reading. Most of them are low-potency British pseudo homeopaths, so you should already know that, anyway. If some of the GVs (Vithoulkas school of thought) have taken that nonsense and run with it, that should also tell you stuff. Ah . . . Ruff! I’d stick my arm down my throat before I ever said anything like that. Newsman Bob would go: “Man sticks his arm down his throat to keep himself shut up. Clever guy. How do we teach other people that kind of stuff?”

The previous homeopaths were called spagyric physicians. They arose from the previous form of it to them, called Hermetic medicine. Its history is as old as ancient Egypt, and they clearly came from somewhere else already civilized because the ancient Egyptians don’t have a period of progress but instead appear on the historical scene already civilized. Isn’t that interesting? Homeopathy also existed in the ancient Rama Empire, and that throws it back quite a bit farther, and we also see in them that they appeared on the historical scene already civilized. Isn’t that even more interesting? I don’t remember what spagyric means, but nobody else online has it right or knows that it was homeopathy in the Way Back Machine. They called Paracelsus a “braggart and quack.” Wanna hear more?

The passage from Hahnemann she only partially quoted is in Article 108 of the ORGANON OF MEDICINE (link: Hahnemann's Organon). We strongly favor noting that she quoted the Kunzli et al. translation from The Hahnemann Foundation, the only one in English worth reading. Good girl! 10 stars and a big smoochie!

Like Paracelsus (Scribe of the Rosicrucian Brotherhood), von Haller was another reformer of allopathic medicine in its Empiricist spectrum, and I believe he was contemporaneous to Hahnemann as a child but died before Samuel Hahnemann grew up. Hahnemann was clearly influenced by him, but it’s absolutely fascinating that he invoked the spagyric physicians only once, and that was near the beginning of homeopathy in paragraph 43 of his formal presentation of homeopathy called ESSAY ON A NEW PRINCIPLE (long subtitle) [link: The Lesser Writings of Samuel Hahnemann - Google Book Search]. Wanna hear more?
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B
www.GiggleBoggleJabbleGooby.com/HaHa
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 08:13 PM.



The information contained on OtherHealth.com arises by way of discussion between contributors and should not be treated as a substitute for the advice provided by your own personal physician or other health care professional. None of the contributions on this site are an endorsement by the site owners of any particular product, or a recommendation as to how to treat any particular disease or health-related condition. If you suspect you have a disease or health-related condition of any kind, you should contact your own health care professional immediately. Please read the BB Rules for further details.
Please consult personally with your own health care professional before starting any diet, exercise, supplementation or medication program.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Copyright 2005-2012 otherhealth.com
For books in the UK visit our sister site Dealpond.com

SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2