No BJ, you said that. I'm not interested in engaging in your transparent "challenges"--I've taught clinical medicine at the university for a number of years. I sincerely hope conventional medicine continues to serve you well.
Goodbye.

In fact, I am more interested in Evidence-Based Medicine.
...and still looking for that with homoeopathy.

I'm not going to read what preceded the last two postings, for they alone indicate that you're wholly ignorant of homeopathy and yet have formed opinions about it, and that indicates you're not a scientist, doesn't it? Let's see a definition of science, oh, silly one. Who wants to bet he misses the real thing and only invokes the idiocy of scientific method while demonstrating the ongoing and seemingly eternal mistake of their kind in failing to spot their basic erroneous assumptions interjected into scientific method? Tell us the three criteria of a real science, and then tell us who or what created all pure sciences. He or she's going to flunk, for they always do.

Here's the part I always love from people like this. The expression "evidence-based medicine" indicates allopathic brainwashing. The brainwashed invariably invoke clichés, platitudes and slogans in lieu of logical reasons for why they do or do not believe something. That dumb expression rests upon a whole series of erroneous assumptions from the self-admitted quacks (by definition, "therapeutic incompetents") of allopathic medicine, i.e., erroneous assumptions I have thoroughly and repeatedly exposed as total falsehoods only adopted by total morons and those, like this guy, who're directly complicit in the mass murder by allopathic physicians in a God-damned blood cult that's as archaic and deadly as anything out of the Dark Ages. He or she is thus going to convulse to death and then be euthanized by his or her heroes. Hurry along, fool, for this planet no longer belongs to your evil kind.

Folks, watch for very predictable reactions to the word “evil,” for these kinds of people can’t define it and thus can’t identify evil people even when they see them in the mirror. Sir, be sure to get your corpse embalmed, too, for we want it to be permanent, and so would you if you knew anything about truth or falsehoods, good or bad or right or wrong.

We have here a typical fool of academia. They're almost all just class-B thinkers (9% of incarnant humanity for 26,000 years) who think they're our leaders, but the only fools they actually lead are the even dumber fools of the masses comprising mere class-C thinkers (90% for the same period comprising the true Dark Ages of our planet). The uniform characteristics of both types, together tragically constituting well over 99% of incarnant humanity, are as follows: They're all ignorant, servile, complacent, selfish, brainwashed and brain damaged (from premature cutting of their umbilical cords by allopaths -- his heroes). Prove it to me, too.

If we accept that you indeed are as wholly ignorant of homeopathy and science in general as you demonstrated in only that one posting of a single sentence, we certainly know that you're not going to be able to make an accurate statement about homeopathy. So, let's lower the bar to the level of quacks and advocates of total quackery and mass murder by physicians and have you make an accurate statement about medicine. I guarantee everyone that he or she won't be able to do it because brainwashed morons only have conditioned-reflex brain reactions to half-truths and lies that invariably demonstrate the "teacha tole me" nonsense of their kind, for they simply lack the clear and independent thought of class-A thinkers and even those degrees of it seen in actual scholars.

Speak, oh, brainwashed one. I've met tens of thousands of your ignorant and presumptuously foolish kind over several decades. Who wants to bet that his or her speech is akin to the barking of a dog? I'll bet a dollar, my safe bet.

How do you test homeopathy? How many major groups of natural phenomena prove higher planes of existence? Tell us what that means, anyway. How many of them come from physics? Tell us what your heroes were doing in all cases well into the 1890s, and tell us how they murdered George Washington (link: Death of Geo. Washington -- the case report indicating that the man simply needed homeopathically potentized Aconite) and every other person for thousands of years. Specifically, show us that you know absolutely nothing accurate about medical history. Tell us the basic precepts of homeopathy. Explain homeopathic potentization. Why is it better called dynamization? Show us your total lack of knowledge by telling everyone else that you've never read the works of Hahnemann or any Hahnemannian. How many years did the American Institute of Homeopathy exist before the American Medical Association, and for how many decades did the first God-damned editor of JAMA advocate bloodletting and calomelization (poisoning with the black oxide of mercury)? Can you count to five?

Allopathic physicians admit that they don't have any cures for 99.99% of deadly illnesses in industrialized countries, and that makes everyone who believes their total nonsense quite insane, so please do prove it to everyone else, too. Allopaths also admit that everything they do creates the very diseases they can't cure. Third strike cometh: Allopaths also admit that they kill 97-98% of their patients. That one must surely hurt, but I know better than to think your kind have any ethics, morality or honor, so I know better than to expect a humane reaction of any kind. Fourth strike does the trick. Allopaths also admit that they're fully responsible for all of the nightmares of industrial chemistry.

Forming opinions without any knowledge whatsoever takes quite a small brain, doesn't it? In fact, I'll bet there are 80 million gazillion dormant brain cells inside your noggin, right? I'm sure some of them talk to each other and go: "I'm lonely, too. Since you're closer, why don't you crawl out his ear and kick this guy?" That's probably the source of your problems, though, isn't it? I mean, a horse kicked you in the head when you were a kid, right? I make good causal diagnoses (etiologies, you call them -- fancy word), don't I? I'll further bet that some dog gnawed off your private parts when you were knocked out, right? That would certainly explain why you're such an ignorant woosie. I'm not as sure of that, though, so what's the actual explanation? It's something like that, right? I predict he'll go, "Yeah, how'd you know that?" I have a crystal ball. That's also how I know you have horns. "Mommy, he's still beating me up." Yeah, but I'll soon not have any truck with you forever because wastes of space are like every black hole to Hell: You're just not worth it. All due praise to the worthy and gone! Measure that, fool.

Did I miss anything? Speak, Fido. I'm sure we all want you to further demonstrate your total ignorance of homeopathy and medicine in general. A man dies and something's gone; where was it? If you could cure, what else would you do? Tell us the primary subjects of medicine. I love their answers to all of those and thousands of other questions, and so will you. Since we all know they're actually the nature of health, disease and therapeutics and the nature of existence and the nature of the universe, tell us what each of those mean.

Tell us what percentage of knowledge is known of human physiology. Then, explain how all but total fools come to any conclusions with just 10% knowledge of a subject. This answer is also going to be good, isn't it?

What's the function of life? How do you cure? What is cure? Define symptom; tell us how many different general kinds of symptoms exist; and place them in the hierarchy of importance.

Oh, my, you're also not going to be able to do that, either, are you, and yet you have medical opinions? I'll bet Daffy Duck does, too, but they're obviously going to be just as relevant, aren't they?

Define medicines and medicinal effects. Tell us the implications of natural laws. Tell us why the laws of chemistry and physics have no functions in medicine. Oops, I'll bet you'll also flunk that one and won't like it, either, will you? Who wants to bet?

I find I have to explain that controvertial statement to avoid assinine entanglements with ignorant sophists like him. Ready, set, go. They'll say that's absurd but only because they believe (emphasis) that a disease diagnosis has importance in therapeutics, but it doesn't. Indeed, all of their experience over at least 2700 years (all we know about thanks to the God-damned Pauline Christians) has proven that or they would have been able to cure at least one person in all of that time, but they haven't precisely because, among other major errors, they have this fundamental assumption of medicine totally wrong. You'd think that hundreds of millions of physicians and scientists over all of that time would have noticed this, but that's the nature of brainwashing (indoctrination to falsehoods); viz., you simply don't notice the obvious when everyone else sustains half-truths and lies. Truly (emphasis cometh), every important advancement in science and the humanities has arisen when one person spotted some basic erroneous assumption and then connected the dots and filled in the gaps, which corrected the resultant conclusions. Consequently, because absolutely all of their basic assumptions, premises, doctrines, theories, paradigms, laws, models, findings, notions, beliefs, ideas, etc. -- the whole thing! -- are totally wrong, allopaths will never be able to cure, and allopathy simply can't ever be reformed, not ever! You get homeopathy when you finally get it right about medicine, and God created homeopathy at Creation -- i.e., by putting into the very fabric of space the fundamental forces of nature we discern as the 10 Laws of Medicine as universe-wide absolutes just like all natural laws -- so that we're not helpless in diseases. That's humbling to most people, but you get used to it because it never ends.

Cure only occurs as a result of an accurate remedy diagnosis. A correct remedy diagnosis can, in turn, only arise via correct application of the Law of Similars, which then precipitates the curative forces that result from correctly applying the Law of Similars. Those manifestations of curative forces are identified as the 4 Laws of Cure (often, although wrongly, called Hering's Laws of Cure, for Hahnemann made all of the observations that Hering merely dropped into the succinct statements required of natural laws) or, more accurately, the 4-part Law of Cure, which is or are merely the reverse of pathological progressions, all of which end in either death or insanity in the case of chronic diseases unless cured. That correct remedy diagnosis or homeopathic prescription must also be homeopathically potentized in order for the similar etheric energy pattern in a person's simillimum ("thing most similar"), meaning their correct remedy, to be able to reintegrate the non-integral etheric energy pattern of a diseased person, which homeopaths know means everyone or people would not exude symptoms.

Consequently, a disease diagnosis plays absolutely no role in an accurate remedy diagnosis, for the former is exclusively made up of mere common symptoms, which will never lead to an unambiguous remedy diagnosis; whereas an accurate remedy diagnosis (i.e., a "homeopathic" prescription, emphasized because the word has a meaning) is exclusively made up of the therapeutically all-important uncommon symptoms of a person. Restated, pathology and therapeutics are completely separate and unrelated subjects. Thus, the laws of chemistry and physics are central to all disease diagnoses, but the 10 Laws of Medicine -- nine of which are unique to homeopathy and its three previous forms back thousands of years -- are alone involved in all remedy diagnoses. Therefore, since the only function of medicine is to cure, the laws of chemistry and physics simply do not play any role in the function of medicine. I hope that's clear because it's also surely obvious -- as Great Truths always are.

Tell us why it's a good idea to accept doctors without cures. Tell us how many patients allopaths kill every year. It's six million just in the United States and nearly 100 million worldwide, and you defend this and don't expect to lose your pitifully pathetic, apparently useless and obviously unwanted Soul at the proverbial Heavenly Tribunal? Oh, yeah, I forgot (nah, just kidding), allopaths and their advocates are either agnostics, atheists or insane religionists, right? You're proud of not knowing anything, aren't you? What's wrong with this picture, Jethro? Therefore, it's a small loss that you're all being permanently removed from our Human Life Wave by your own hands and ignorance of the nature of existence, then, isn't it?

Tell us how you can justify the creation of diseases by your heroes. Tell us why all of the nightmares of industrial chemistry, which allopaths are directly responsible for, are a good idea. A guy comes to us for homeopathic treatment and says, "They tell me I have a terminal illness." Tell us how often that happens.

We had 23 homeopathic medical schools in 19th-century America and over 150 hospitals, major clinics and asylums for the tubercular and insane before the infamous and arguably nefarious FLEXNOR REPORT of 1910 bankrupted all but two of them, which didn’t survive the Great Depression. (Link: King's HISTORY OF HOMEOPATHY IN AMERICA.) Explain how that’s possible if our drugs are mere placebos. Tens of millions of patients were fooled, including the likes of Mark Twain and John D. Rockefeller? Show us how that’s statistically possible, and I’ll eat an elephant whole and raw in one gulp. It’s not, Jethro, but I’d like to see you try.

One of them was Hahnemann Hospital and Medical School in Philadelphia, which is still alive and running but in allopathic hands. Tell us why they didn’t even bother to change the name. Obviously, it was a trophy prize to them. These are the people you’re proud of? That speaks volumes about you, doesn’t it? You have no character, no honor, no integrity and probably don’t even know what those mean.

Somebody tell us which remedies come to mind for reprobates. I've seen well over 100 brilliant homeopathic Minds post here since I started, and a very large percentage of them have been seen since I renewed these efforts about a year ago, so, speak, guys. It's a definite category to us, so which remedies? I promise I will not bite, bang or abuse homeopathic students. Which remedies are the reprobates? (Note: "Remedy" and "patient" are synonyms to us because they're the same thing when this is finally understood.) Impress me, and I also will never forget you.

This stuff is what we actually know, pal, and you don’t even have a clue about the human condition because you’re too lazy and arrogant to test homeopathy in the only way it can be done without the expert status necessary to prescribe. You probably still don’t know what that means, do you? Every homeopathic student is leagues in advance of you and your allopathic kind.

What were your heroes doing throughout the 19th century and for millennia while homeopaths were practicing 25th-century medicine that's also as old as civilization? Sir William Osler, M.D., coined the term “scientific medicine” in the 1880s to describe Rationalist allopathy, now called modern medicine. Tell us why they changed the name after he advocated bloodletting before the graduating class of either Oxford or Cambridge in 1914. That's shocking, isn't it?

How many thousands of maieutic questions do you think I can ask fools like you that expose you as total morons and unwitting advocates of mass murder by physicians? Driven by a high sense of social justice identical to why Christ drove God-damned bankers, unprincipled businessmen and mere religionists -- who still think they can buy their way into Heaven -- out of the temple, I ask: How do I despise thee? Let me count the ways. I already did that, though, didn’t I?

In short, shut up, you moron, and get a new brain!

Everyone else, God bless!

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B
www.GiggleBoggleJabbleGooby.com/HaHa

Hi friends,
Happy diwali.
It feels nice that still the disscussion is on..
I thought somebody will trying to visit this hospital.

Suchi,

We have one thing in common.
We spell homoeopathy the same way :)

BillyJoe