A happy story from my house...
Although this is about a cow, it seems so easy to transpose this
picture onto a human, and since syphilinum is one of those "intense"
remedies that one doesn't read many cases of (at least *I* have not
read many cases of), I thought I would share it.

Some of you might remember about a year ago I wrote about a calf that
had been given to us to see if we could pull her through, because she
needed too much special care for the farm she'd been born on--couldn't
stand without help due to turned-under hooves; milk would pour out of
her nose as she drank (cleft palate?); more or less constant oozing
from nose and eyes; severe and persistent diarrhea; and recurrent
pneumonia. And such a pathetic air... And an odd thing, despite her
"pathetic air", and despite being a "baby"--and the tiny calves are
usually so appealing!--this one was hard to be around; I kept having to
fight off not just pity, but revulsion. But we didn't want to let her
down, and we had good help with the "nuts and bolts" of dealing with
her issues...

Short version--After several failed remedies, I gave her syphilinum 10M
(I think based mostly on pronounced asymmetry of her face, tho other
things seemed to support it too). She did just beautifully--pneumonias
stopped, discharges stopped, and she became a happy, peaceful,
reasonably normal-looking heifer. When she got big enough she joined
the herd, and did very well for I'm thinking about eight months.

Next chapter: I wasn't really surprised when, some months later, she
started to seem not-so-well again. A beginning like hers did not seem
likely to be a "one-dose miracle". But for "technical reasons" I
didn't follow thru with her at that time, just noticed the changes and
kept thinking I *needed* to get her another dose, and see if it would
help her again!
But in the meantime she changed very dramatically. She never did hang
out with the herd--not just lack of interest, but definite aversion;
she avoided them, and they avoided her. She became a huge, dark,
hulking shape, stalking the far reaches of the field--yet with a
strange craving for human attention. When I (and presumably my
husband) were in the pen, she would come straight over, with an air
that I first found touching--poor thing really needs some
attention!--but soon found *very* unnerving, very weird. *Way* too
intrusive, too intense, really made me nervous. (All of our half-dozen
cows are very friendly, and all of them come over for pats, but none in
an even remotely similar way to hers.) And my husband remarked she one
had to be careful around her, because her "friendliness" sometimes
turned to aggression (score one for my "instinct"...).
The other two notable things have been: more-or-less ongoing really
horrible green discharge from her nose (chewed up grass or green snot?
Don't know.), and a just awesomely horrible smell. Cows are not
sweet-smelling, but this one smelled like... well, maybe like horribly
moldy socks mixed in with general filth. Don't know how to describe,
but again, not even remotely like what any of our others ever smelled
like, and a very strong smell!

Last week I got a chance to try again to re-dose. I dissolved a few
pillules and sprinkled the liquid onto a scoop of grain--which they
normally do not get, but they *love*. At least the *other* ones love
it. She gave it a dismissive sniff, and walked away. (Dose? No dose?
Hm...)

But---The next morning, darned if she wasn't in with the group, hanging
out, grazing and swishing her tail with the others, just like a
"normal" cow!! A few days ago I finally got close to her (not so easy,
since she now prefers the herd over me!), and--no smell!!!!! Nothing
at all beyond normal ol' cow smell, and not even much of that. Casual
friendly interest in me, but nothing more--just like the others. This
time I'll try to follow her more closely, and not let so much time
lapse...

That's it so far--I hope this was of interest to anyone, as it surely
has been to me!
Cheers,
Shannon

Feels good to read such things.

And then: would you have any idea about why this calf came to be (from birth) as it was?

Hennie

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 13-7-06 at 8:47 Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:

>A happy story from my house...
>Although this is about a cow, it seems so easy to transpose this
>picture onto a human, and since syphilinum is one of those "intense"
>remedies that one doesn't read many cases of (at least *I* have not
>read many cases of), I thought I would share it.
>
>Some of you might remember about a year ago I wrote about a calf that
>had been given to us to see if we could pull her through, because she
>needed too much special care for the farm she'd been born on--couldn't
>stand without help due to turned-under hooves; milk would pour out of
>her nose as she drank (cleft palate?); more or less constant oozing
>from nose and eyes; severe and persistent diarrhea; and recurrent
>pneumonia. And such a pathetic air... And an odd thing, despite her
>"pathetic air", and despite being a "baby"--and the tiny calves are
>usually so appealing!--this one was hard to be around; I kept having to
>fight off not just pity, but revulsion. But we didn't want to let her
>down, and we had good help with the "nuts and bolts" of dealing with
>her issues...
>
>Short version--After several failed remedies, I gave her syphilinum 10M
> (I think based mostly on pronounced asymmetry of her face, tho other
>things seemed to support it too). She did just beautifully--pneumonias
>stopped, discharges stopped, and she became a happy, peaceful,
>reasonably normal-looking heifer. When she got big enough she joined
>the herd, and did very well for I'm thinking about eight months.
>
>Next chapter: I wasn't really surprised when, some months later, she
>started to seem not-so-well again. A beginning like hers did not seem
>likely to be a "one-dose miracle". But for "technical reasons" I
>didn't follow thru with her at that time, just noticed the changes and
>kept thinking I *needed* to get her another dose, and see if it would
>help her again!
> But in the meantime she changed very dramatically. She never did hang
>out with the herd--not just lack of interest, but definite aversion;
>she avoided them, and they avoided her. She became a huge, dark,
>hulking shape, stalking the far reaches of the field--yet with a
>strange craving for human attention. When I (and presumably my
>husband) were in the pen, she would come straight over, with an air
>that I first found touching--poor thing really needs some
>attention!--but soon found *very* unnerving, very weird. *Way* too
>intrusive, too intense, really made me nervous. (All of our half-dozen
>cows are very friendly, and all of them come over for pats, but none in
>an even remotely similar way to hers.) And my husband remarked she one
>had to be careful around her, because her "friendliness" sometimes
>turned to aggression (score one for my "instinct"...).
> The other two notable things have been: more-or-less ongoing really
>horrible green discharge from her nose (chewed up grass or green snot?
>Don't know.), and a just awesomely horrible smell. Cows are not
>sweet-smelling, but this one smelled like... well, maybe like horribly
>moldy socks mixed in with general filth. Don't know how to describe,
>but again, not even remotely like what any of our others ever smelled
>like, and a very strong smell!
>
>Last week I got a chance to try again to re-dose. I dissolved a few
>pillules and sprinkled the liquid onto a scoop of grain--which they
>normally do not get, but they *love*. At least the *other* ones love
>it. She gave it a dismissive sniff, and walked away. (Dose? No dose?
> Hm...)
>
>But---The next morning, darned if she wasn't in with the group, hanging
>out, grazing and swishing her tail with the others, just like a
>"normal" cow!! A few days ago I finally got close to her (not so easy,
>since she now prefers the herd over me!), and--no smell!!!!! Nothing
>at all beyond normal ol' cow smell, and not even much of that. Casual
>friendly interest in me, but nothing more--just like the others. This
>time I'll try to follow her more closely, and not let so much time
>lapse...
>
>That's it so far--I hope this was of interest to anyone, as it surely
>has been to me!
>Cheers,
>Shannon
>
>

An, the ten-thousand-dollar question!! (Why she came to be this way.)
I doubt that her ancestors had syphilis, but who knows. :-) I've
followed the debates about whether Hahnemann's miasms are
disease-specific, or whether other agents can give rise to the same
miasm. Dunno, but personally I lean toward the latter. What would
cause a calf to be born this way... ??Toxic exposure of the mother??
Or just a genetic fluke, or... Ach, the other image is just too
unpleasant... :-) What do *you* think or others?
Shannon

On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Hennie Duits wrote:

> Feels good to read such things.
>
> And then: would you have any idea about why this calf came to be (from
> birth) as it was?
>
> Hennie
>
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 13-7-06 at 8:47 Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
>
>> A happy story from my house...
>> Although this is about a cow, it seems so easy to transpose this
>> picture onto a human, and since syphilinum is one of those "intense"
>> remedies that one doesn't read many cases of (at least *I* have not
>> read many cases of), I thought I would share it.
>>
>> Some of you might remember about a year ago I wrote about a calf that
>> had been given to us to see if we could pull her through, because she
>> needed too much special care for the farm she'd been born on--couldn't
>> stand without help due to turned-under hooves; milk would pour out of
>> her nose as she drank (cleft palate?); more or less constant oozing
>> from nose and eyes; severe and persistent diarrhea; and recurrent
>> pneumonia. And such a pathetic air... And an odd thing, despite her
>> "pathetic air", and despite being a "baby"--and the tiny calves are
>> usually so appealing!--this one was hard to be around; I kept having
>> to
>> fight off not just pity, but revulsion. But we didn't want to let her
>> down, and we had good help with the "nuts and bolts" of dealing with
>> her issues...
>>
>> Short version--After several failed remedies, I gave her syphilinum
>> 10M
>> (I think based mostly on pronounced asymmetry of her face, tho other
>> things seemed to support it too). She did just
>> beautifully--pneumonias
>> stopped, discharges stopped, and she became a happy, peaceful,
>> reasonably normal-looking heifer. When she got big enough she joined
>> the herd, and did very well for I'm thinking about eight months.
>>
>> Next chapter: I wasn't really surprised when, some months later, she
>> started to seem not-so-well again. A beginning like hers did not seem
>> likely to be a "one-dose miracle". But for "technical reasons" I
>> didn't follow thru with her at that time, just noticed the changes and
>> kept thinking I *needed* to get her another dose, and see if it would
>> help her again!
>> But in the meantime she changed very dramatically. She never did
>> hang
>> out with the herd--not just lack of interest, but definite aversion;
>> she avoided them, and they avoided her. She became a huge, dark,
>> hulking shape, stalking the far reaches of the field--yet with a
>> strange craving for human attention. When I (and presumably my
>> husband) were in the pen, she would come straight over, with an air
>> that I first found touching--poor thing really needs some
>> attention!--but soon found *very* unnerving, very weird. *Way* too
>> intrusive, too intense, really made me nervous. (All of our
>> half-dozen
>> cows are very friendly, and all of them come over for pats, but none
>> in
>> an even remotely similar way to hers.) And my husband remarked she
>> one
>> had to be careful around her, because her "friendliness" sometimes
>> turned to aggression (score one for my "instinct"...).
>> The other two notable things have been: more-or-less ongoing really
>> horrible green discharge from her nose (chewed up grass or green snot?
>> Don't know.), and a just awesomely horrible smell. Cows are not
>> sweet-smelling, but this one smelled like... well, maybe like horribly
>> moldy socks mixed in with general filth. Don't know how to describe,
>> but again, not even remotely like what any of our others ever smelled
>> like, and a very strong smell!
>>
>> Last week I got a chance to try again to re-dose. I dissolved a few
>> pillules and sprinkled the liquid onto a scoop of grain--which they
>> normally do not get, but they *love*. At least the *other* ones love
>> it. She gave it a dismissive sniff, and walked away. (Dose? No
>> dose?
>> Hm...)
>>
>> But---The next morning, darned if she wasn't in with the group,
>> hanging
>> out, grazing and swishing her tail with the others, just like a
>> "normal" cow!! A few days ago I finally got close to her (not so
>> easy,
>> since she now prefers the herd over me!), and--no smell!!!!! Nothing
>> at all beyond normal ol' cow smell, and not even much of that. Casual
>> friendly interest in me, but nothing more--just like the others. This
>> time I'll try to follow her more closely, and not let so much time
>> lapse...
>>
>> That's it so far--I hope this was of interest to anyone, as it surely
>> has been to me!
>> Cheers,
>> Shannon
>>
>>

No inbreeding on the farm she comes from? Does she have (older) brothers/sisters? Same parents?
(And about the too unpleasant image - monkeys have the sort of AIDS they can live with, so, hm..)
Could indeed be anything, but there was nothing that made you frown, right?

Hennie
*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 13-7-06 at 23:32 Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:

>An, the ten-thousand-dollar question!! (Why she came to be this way.)
>I doubt that her ancestors had syphilis, but who knows. :-) I've
>followed the debates about whether Hahnemann's miasms are
>disease-specific, or whether other agents can give rise to the same
>miasm. Dunno, but personally I lean toward the latter. What would
>cause a calf to be born this way... ??Toxic exposure of the mother??
>Or just a genetic fluke, or... Ach, the other image is just too
>unpleasant... :-) What do *you* think or others?
>Shannon
>

I had been thinking, I'll ask the folks we got her from what else they
can tell us about her lineage etc. Inbreeding seems awfully unlikely,
as it's all artificial insemination, and the choices are (I gather)
rather carefully made, but I guess I don't know for sure. Next week
I'll see if they can tell me any more--it has made me curious!!
Shannon

On Jul 14, 2006, at 8:11 AM, Hennie Duits wrote:

> No inbreeding on the farm she comes from? Does she have (older)
> brothers/sisters? Same parents?
> (And about the too unpleasant image - monkeys have the sort of AIDS
> they can live with, so, hm..)
> Could indeed be anything, but there was nothing that made you frown,
> right?
>
> Hennie
> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>
> On 13-7-06 at 23:32 Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
>
>> An, the ten-thousand-dollar question!! (Why she came to be this way.)
>> I doubt that her ancestors had syphilis, but who knows. :-) I've
>> followed the debates about whether Hahnemann's miasms are
>> disease-specific, or whether other agents can give rise to the same
>> miasm. Dunno, but personally I lean toward the latter. What would
>> cause a calf to be born this way... ??Toxic exposure of the mother??
>> Or just a genetic fluke, or... Ach, the other image is just too
>> unpleasant... :-) What do *you* think or others?
>> Shannon
>>
>
>
>

On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:

> An, the ten-thousand-dollar question!! (Why she came to be this way.) I
> doubt that her ancestors had syphilis, but who knows. :-) I've followed
> the debates about whether Hahnemann's miasms are disease-specific, or whether
> other agents can give rise to the same miasm. Dunno, but personally I lean
> toward the latter. What would cause a calf to be born this way... ??Toxic
> exposure of the mother?? Or just a genetic fluke, or... Ach, the other
> image is just too unpleasant... :-) What do *you* think or others?


I think that for those of us who consider illness as
disturbance/distortion/distunement of the life force, it would be
logical to conclude that other influences could disturbe the life
force to the same effect that the original miasm does.

There is really not evidence that people under say the syphilis miasm
have ever had syphilis or that any of their ancestors had.

Same with psora.

I used to be convinced that psora had nothing to do with scabies.
After working with v. Boenninghausen's cases I am no longer sure of
that - 150 + years ago the evidence really does seem to point to it.

Whether or not to-day's psora in people who never had scabies is
indeed an inherited trait or whether other influences are causing the
same disturbance of the LF - there is, IFAIK no evidence either way.

Regards

Luise


>
> On Jul 13, 2006, at 9:26 PM, Hennie Duits wrote:
>
>> Feels good to read such things.
>>
>> And then: would you have any idea about why this calf came to be (from
>> birth) as it was?
>>
>> Hennie
>>
>> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
>>
>> On 13-7-06 at 8:47 Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
>>
>> > A happy story from my house...
>> > Although this is about a cow, it seems so easy to transpose this
>> > picture onto a human, and since syphilinum is one of those "intense"
>> > remedies that one doesn't read many cases of (at least *I* have not
>> > read many cases of), I thought I would share it.
>> >
>> > Some of you might remember about a year ago I wrote about a calf that
>> > had been given to us to see if we could pull her through, because she
>> > needed too much special care for the farm she'd been born on--couldn't
>> > stand without help due to turned-under hooves; milk would pour out of
>> > her nose as she drank (cleft palate?); more or less constant oozing
>> > from nose and eyes; severe and persistent diarrhea; and recurrent
>> > pneumonia. And such a pathetic air... And an odd thing, despite her
>> > "pathetic air", and despite being a "baby"--and the tiny calves are
>> > usually so appealing!--this one was hard to be around; I kept having to
>> > fight off not just pity, but revulsion. But we didn't want to let her
>> > down, and we had good help with the "nuts and bolts" of dealing with
>> > her issues...
>> >
>> > Short version--After several failed remedies, I gave her syphilinum 10M
>> > (I think based mostly on pronounced asymmetry of her face, tho other
>> > things seemed to support it too). She did just beautifully--pneumonias
>> > stopped, discharges stopped, and she became a happy, peaceful,
>> > reasonably normal-looking heifer. When she got big enough she joined
>> > the herd, and did very well for I'm thinking about eight months.
>> >
>> > Next chapter: I wasn't really surprised when, some months later, she
>> > started to seem not-so-well again. A beginning like hers did not seem
>> > likely to be a "one-dose miracle". But for "technical reasons" I
>> > didn't follow thru with her at that time, just noticed the changes and
>> > kept thinking I *needed* to get her another dose, and see if it would
>> > help her again!
>> > But in the meantime she changed very dramatically. She never did
>> > hang
>> > out with the herd--not just lack of interest, but definite aversion;
>> > she avoided them, and they avoided her. She became a huge, dark,
>> > hulking shape, stalking the far reaches of the field--yet with a
>> > strange craving for human attention. When I (and presumably my
>> > husband) were in the pen, she would come straight over, with an air
>> > that I first found touching--poor thing really needs some
>> > attention!--but soon found *very* unnerving, very weird. *Way* too
>> > intrusive, too intense, really made me nervous. (All of our half-dozen
>> > cows are very friendly, and all of them come over for pats, but none in
>> > an even remotely similar way to hers.) And my husband remarked she one
>> > had to be careful around her, because her "friendliness" sometimes
>> > turned to aggression (score one for my "instinct"...).
>> > The other two notable things have been: more-or-less ongoing really
>> > horrible green discharge from her nose (chewed up grass or green snot?
>> > Don't know.), and a just awesomely horrible smell. Cows are not
>> > sweet-smelling, but this one smelled like... well, maybe like horribly
>> > moldy socks mixed in with general filth. Don't know how to describe,
>> > but again, not even remotely like what any of our others ever smelled
>> > like, and a very strong smell!
>> >
>> > Last week I got a chance to try again to re-dose. I dissolved a few
>> > pillules and sprinkled the liquid onto a scoop of grain--which they
>> > normally do not get, but they *love*. At least the *other* ones love
>> > it. She gave it a dismissive sniff, and walked away. (Dose? No dose?
>> > Hm...)
>> >
>> > But---The next morning, darned if she wasn't in with the group, hanging
>> > out, grazing and swishing her tail with the others, just like a
>> > "normal" cow!! A few days ago I finally got close to her (not so easy,
>> > since she now prefers the herd over me!), and--no smell!!!!! Nothing
>> > at all beyond normal ol' cow smell, and not even much of that. Casual
>> > friendly interest in me, but nothing more--just like the others. This
>> > time I'll try to follow her more closely, and not let so much time
>> > lapse...
>> >
>> > That's it so far--I hope this was of interest to anyone, as it surely
>> > has been to me!
>> > Cheers,
>> > Shannon
>> >
>>>

Dear Shannon
Wonderfull story posted...........Thanks!
I witness this isolation myself regards a cow in Washington state.
The cow was an albino,placed in a corral with lots of other cows that were the commonly brown color. This albino cow took a liking for me,it seemed so lonely/sad as the other cows stayed away from any interaction with her.
She was always by herself. Its so odd how animals interact,you would think the superficial symptoms of not having color(albino) would NOT make any difference,but i guess it does.

Gina Tyler

__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein

>
> On 13-7-06 at 23:32 Robert & Shannon Nelson wrote:
>
>> An, the ten-thousand-dollar question!! (Why she came to be this way.)
>> I doubt that her ancestors had syphilis, but who knows. :-) I've
>> followed the debates about whether Hahnemann's miasms are
>> disease-specific, or whether other agents can give rise to the same
>> miasm. Dunno, but personally I lean toward the latter. What would
>> cause a calf to be born this way... ??Toxic exposure of the mother??
>> Or just a genetic fluke, or... Ach, the other image is just too
>> unpleasant... :-) What do *you* think or others?
>> Shannon
>>
CASE OF THE HAPPY COW
Certainly there is a crossover bovine-to-human. Only one example of that is
Creutzfeld-Jakob Bovine spongioform encephalopathy (Mad Cow Disease). No
doubt (with Shannons case prima facie evidence) -- cows have some form of
expression of the syphilitic miasm (likely the vital bodies of dead
treponema which live indefinitely in the vital bodies and genome of that
bovine line of parentage). They may not express a disease that looks like
human syphilis (genital chancres or the like, followed by two later stages
of deeper expression). But at least one researcher, physician Albert
Abrams, thought there was a "bovine syphilis".

Abrams, the founder of what later became instrumented homeopathic medicine
using the quantum field (an accredited profession in Great Britain),
"postulated that all cancer was the late result of syphilis, active or
congenital and that vaccination would cause a form of "bovine syphilis,"
although no one could define what that was..."

The name Vaccination was minted because the concept was first demonstrated
by use of cowpox given to humans to immunize against human smallpox. But
the connection to cows is actually deeper than that. The pathogens used in
many vaccine stocks are cultured *IN* live cows held in stanchions. The
cows are probably "destroyed" afterwards, but most people can imagine how
these kinds of "precautions" almost always fail. Thus human syphilis, and
thus the syphilitic miasm (vital bodies of the treponema which are not
detectable by any standard lab test, but homeopaths can ID by semiology as
in Shannon's pt) could have made it into the cow genome by that route at
least. The whole microbe and thus the miasm could have already been there
from other crossover, or because it exists in cows anyway but is not
commonly expressed (nor tested for as it is not expected, nor known to be an
issue). Vaccination culturing has probably put whole microbes -- and thus
following from that by procreation the vital bodies of the dead whole
microbe -- into the vital component of the cow genome. Shannon's lucky cow
may be expressing bovine syphilitic miasm as a result. It looks quite a bit
like the human version, and a dose of 10M human syphilis seems to destroy it
until it reequilibrated and a second dose was needed. Maybe two doses of
10M will permanently remove this taint from this cow.

Shannon's case is likely to be one of the syphilitic *miasm*, not chronic
syphilis per se. We do not fully cure extant syphilis in humans with
measurable whole treponema pall. being expressed by the human vital force
with syphilinum -- except perhaps in some rare case. Syphilinum will affect
the treponema foreign vital force, but the semiologic simillimum for the
case is what is needed to cure the episode of extant disease. So what
Shannon must have treated is the syphilitic miasm which expressed such that
syphilinum was its simillimum -- not the extant host disease associated with
the whole and detectable treponema pall or a related bovine pathogen
species.

ASIDE --We *can* "immunize" homeopathically for the extant syphilis with the
isopathic which acts on that miasm already present -- reducing
susceptibility. This effect probably is based on reduction of the vital
bodies of the same specie as the invading whole microbe. These vital bodies
already being present like a trojan horse in the organism -- may be the
explanation for what we call "susceptibility".

MORE ON THE MECHANISM FOR ACUTE AND CHRONIC DISEASE PROPAGATION AND
EXPRESSION
I have written on this hypothesis which provides explanation for Hahnemanns
Chronic disease theory which predates the era of Pasteurian theory, and the
proof in quantum mathematics of a "zero point" or highly energetic quantum
ether of which life ether has been discussed by several over the last
century. In draft form, more coverage of this hypothesis is given here.
Foreign vital bodies of the given species of pathogen imbibed by exposure
may not be "caught" fast enough by the host humoral immunity system because
of antigenic mutation (new "strain"). Conventional vaccination (antigenic
mechanism, not isopathic) will not work if the host antigenic "library" of
"enemies" was not updated by the exposure, or there is defect in the humoral
immunity functions of the vaccine recipient; or in their vital
(nonmolecular) immune mechanisms.

In simple terms, vaccination is essentially exposure to an attenuated
pathogen or its dead version with antigens intact -- which elicits a
sub-clinical disease that has the effect of updating the host immune
recognition system to know "self versus not-self" in cells. "Vaccination"
is probably wholly based on antigenic update, not annihilation by similarity
(destructive resonance on what we could call, for lack of better term at
present - the quantum electrodynamic level -- of which electromagnetic level
is what is called in physics a *special case*). Vital force is not
electromagnetic itself, though close enough to it that remedies can be made
electromagnetically to affect it).

The foreign vital bodies of a microbe already present in the host by
inheritance or incompletely aborted disease in that lifetime may potentiate
fast reproduction of the whole microbes. Invading whole unicellular
decomposer microbes (bacteria in the case of Syphilis) "mint" new physical
cells by mitosis (division). Available vital bodies already within the host
to occupy those daughter cells could accelerate the colonization,
overwhelming the immune cell subsystems of the host organism. This could be
the basis of what we call "susceptibility" to a colonization becoming an
"infection" that the Host organism cannot deal with and threatens
destruction of organ systems, tissues, or of life itself.

MECHANISM OF HOMEOPATHIC TREATMENT AND ISOPATHIC PROPHYLAXIS
The nonphysical (quantum electrodynamic) pattern of the isopathic remedy
annihilates a portion of the already extant but symptomologically
insignificant (for example in syphilis -treponema vital bodies) in the host
vital system, reducing susceptibility to the whole microbes if exposed to
them. The mechanism of annihilation in isopathy is the same as in
homeopathy, most likely (destructive resonance). Destructive resonance
requires a small amount of energy to create a large destructive effect
because of match between pattern of the suite of resonant frequencies of
medicine with that of the host vital force and foreign vital force meld.

A hypothesis following from this is that when the effect of the pathogen is
not expressed sympomologically by the (host vital force mixed with the
foreign vital force and its antigenic, biochemical, and nutritional effects
as evident as peculiar signs and symptoms) -- then the "latent" foreign
vital force present in the host is susceptible and similar to its isopathic
version. Someone on Homeolist or Minutus asked a while back what the
mechanism of isopathic immunization might be. This is the short and
introductory version of one answer to that question.

But when the "acute" (whole microbe); or endogenous (microbial vital body
(miasmatic) only) disease process is *underway*, the mixed expression of
foreign and host vital force is not similar to only the isopathic for the
microbial vital force. The curative remedy is most often that matching the
semiologic expression of the two living wholisms of mixed expression
(multicellular host "infected" (overwhelmingly colonized) by the unicellular
decomposer whole microbe (microbial vital force in physical cell PLUS that
foreign vital force itself. The expression of the acute or chronic disease
is emblematic of only the delta (the difference between unencumbered host
cells and those deranged by foreign vital force (housed in physical microbe
cells or not). Thus the annihilation is of the foreign vital force bodies,
not the host cells.

However, in endogenous chronic disease, the invasion of host cells has made
more time-dependent, insidious inroads into cellular subsystems. The effect
of potencies on the host cells, especially in organic disease -- is more
marked - as the host cells are being severely influenced by foreign
microbial bodies living in its colony of specialized host cells. Thus the
delicacy of treating chronic cases -- as opposed to acute cases in which the
organism will bear potencies of any dynamization with more ease. The target
in acute disease is more the foreign vital forces expressing through the
host but only recently arrived, and in whole-microbe form, separate from the
host VF - except regarding the load of latent foriegn vital bodies already
present which likely create the initial susceptibility to successful
infection. While in contrast, in endogenous chronic disease, the foreign
vital force (while still technically separate) is involved in long-term
inductive derangement more intertwined with the host vital economy.
Endogenous is from within. Acute is from without, but potentiated from
within. According to the hypothesis presented here -- acute infection is a
"surprise attack" using the trojan horse of already present foreign vital
bodies (of the same specie of decomposer microbe as the invading
whole-microbe).

In the chronic case, the foreign vital bodies act without any physical
cellular body. Their inductive weakening of their favorite host cellular
subsystem target (e.g. syphilis all nerve cells. and reproductive locus)
creates endogenous disease of origin only known to those who espouse
Hahneman's empirically proven theory of chronic disease. Every day in
practice we prove that theory -- that foreign vital bodies of a microbe live
on in the offspring of those carrying those bodies inherited in parental
lineage -- or having had the incompletely aborted infectious disease of that
microbe in their lifetime.

TRIGGERING CAUSE AND APPARENT ETIOLOGY SUPERIMPOSED ON PROXIMATE (MIASMATIC)
ETIOLOGY
The miasmatic disease of an endogenous infection by what we call a "latent"
miasm until it is expressed -- becomes known usually after a "triggering
cause". "External" physical or emotional trauma "chooses" that meridianal
subsystem because it has already been weakened by clinging foreign
decomposer vital bodies (vital bodies of dead microbes) trying to run the
host cells inductively. The triggering cause (etiological factor, NBWS
factor) is a result of latent miasmatic infection having already been at
work. That weakened meridianal subsystem goes into a failure mode which we
call chronic organic pathology of lesser or greater severity (also known as
diagnosable, or clinical disease). With homeopathy, we can annihilate those
infecting foreign vital bodies when the disease is still subclinical,
identified by more subtle factors. We may not be able to definitively ID
the specie of foreign vital body (miasm) which is almost always a
combination -- possibly with one (Sankaran) of these "miasms" being
dominant. But we can often ID the similar remedy to the "vector sum" of the
miasms contributing to the state based on the match of Hahemannian semiology
of patient and medicine -- and thus annihilate the vital disease before the
stage of organic (physical) cellular failure has a chance to ensue.

BIOCHEMICAL PATHOGENOCIDAL MEDICINE AND THE RISE OF CHRONIC DISEASE
Conventional pharmaceutical medicine predicates treatment of infectious
acute disease on pathogenocidal agents, notably the fungal preparations
known as "antibiotics". These can save one's life, but the vital bodies of
the microbes killed probably are never excreted and live on in the vital
meridians of the host organism as a latent Hahnemannian (infectious) miasm.

Thus ABs while a great boon to treatment of acute disease, generate chronic
disease. In fact, the ratio of acute disease to chronic disease has been
reversed in countries where ABs have been used exclusively since widespread
introduction in 1945. The last half-century has seen a great efflorescence
of chronic diseases as has perhaps never been seen before in the history of
humanity. Susceptibility to acute disease also increases in this manner, if
the hypothesis in this snippet (which relies on Hahnemann's empirical
discoveries and expositions on them in the Organon and The Chronic Diseases)
is correct.

>From two hundred years of homeopathic medicine and everyday results in
practice, we can confirm Hahnemann's idea that vital microbe bodies live on
in the offspring, and create chronic effects which maintain identifiable
connection to the predecessor acute infectious disease in the parentage.
This is the basis of homeopathic nosology (the origin of the extant remedy
state being miasmatic) -- and probably the single greatest discovery of
Hahnemann. Law of Similars/Law of Resonance medicine was systematized by
Hahnemann - his first great achievement which will go on into the future of
human history as the most effective medicinal system if we can make it more
reliable. But it was already known in recorded history back to the
Egyptians, though not systematized. But The Chronic Diseases was a
discovery uniquely due to Hahnemann, and involving over a decade of
empirical work side by side with original theoretical development.

Acute disease had been the great eliminator of acute susceptibility by
killing off those with the miasm (e.g. natural selection). But Antibiotics
save those individuals, and conserve their miasmatic infections and even
increase them. Successful homeopathic treatment of acute disease by
individual anamnesis or Genius epidemicus; or by isopathic prophylaxis -
means effective annihilation of the specie of vital pathogen, reducing
miasmatic load (as well as the extant disease). Conventional treatment is
not treatment of the vital infectious agent - but of its physical body
only.

*Successful* homeopathic treatment addresses not only the acute disease
itself, but forestalls both acute susceptibility and chronic disease. Both
are caused by infectious disease incompletely resolved because microbial
vital bodies remain in the host even if their physical bodies are decimated.
Only life force of the appropriate pattern or force -- or the
electromagnetic or water-borne percussion potency mimic of a given vital
force pattern -- can annihilate the vital force of a microbe.

The latter concept is why homeopathic medicine and Hahnemann's theory of
Chronic Diseases are a particularly profound and final medicinal solution to
disease -- when practical success can be attained. The foreign microbial
vital force already present in the Host (cf Organon 148-sixth edition)
begets acute infectious disease, which in turn begets endogenous chronic
disease AND continued susceptibility to that same acute influence.
Incompletely resolved Infectious disease begets both chronic disease and
increased susceptibility to that infectious acute again in the parental
lineage - in a positive feedback loop.

The chronic miasms are passed to offspring increasingly because with
antibiotic treatment, even the most egregious miasmatic carriers survive and
potentially reproduce. The medicine of destructive pattern resonance
(homoepathy) is a solution having in its present form become one of the
widely used systems of medicine on the planet, even against odds that
medicine and biology have an ostrich approach to the quantum revolution in
science which is already over a century old. But homeopathy has only
limited reach in chronic disease because of the sheer numbers of people on
earth and the need for bullseye prescriptions over a long term. The use of
the group totality remedy is only a partial solution to this limitation, as
the patient-individualized remedy is almost always needed, and is time and
labor-intensive, and thus expensive, and requires highly skilled
practitioners and universal remedy availability.

NONSEMIOLOGIC INSTRUMENTED COMPLEMENT TO OUR METHODS
Additionally, a nonsemiologic means to aid practice is needed beyond
improvement of indications by provings, introduction of new remedies, and
other methods to allow access to the materia medica (such as taxonomic
groupings (for ex. J. Scholten periodic chart thematic groupings;
traditional use of Linnean taxonomy; triangulation of kingdom, taxonomy and
miasm (Rajan Sankaran)). A challenge for homeopathy is making the task of
finding the remedy -- especially in chronic disease -- far more
reproducible, confirmable and rapid by any skilled practitioner -- of whom
our best prescribers claim optimal result in only a third to half of chronic
cases. Such an aid widely used will improve both efficiency and level of
success.

To complement prescribing soley on semiologic basis, homeopathy needs
reliable, reproducible and *objective* means to both search for remedy
candidates when not at all clear -- and confirm prescriptions.
Biolumanetics is an instrumented system, possibly the state of the art in
homeopathic confirmatory systems used in classical practice at present.
Instrumented systems have the disadvantage of expense and loss of
self-reliance. But have the advantage of removal of practitioner
subjectivity and skill needed for such confirmatory methods as pupillary
response, pulse, or Applied kinesiology. We need to use instrumented
systems and create others, and make them affordable for practitioners.
Beyond any advance in semiology and teaching efficacy, we can avoid failures
and increase efficiency only by another way to measure resonance between
medicine and patient prior to its introduction to the water of the patients
body -- typically attended by 4 weeks of wait until the next followup to
find out the degree of resonance (ie. our only testbed is using the pt as a
guinea pig at the potential expense of their time and health as well as
their money).

But a system like biolumanetic photography can only confirm, not assay.
We need reliable affordable instrumented ways to do comparative vital force
assay against our remedy database -- to find what remedies may be resonant
in cases in which the remedy cannot be found by semiologic anamnesis --
either by dearth of inforemation from client -- or lack of indications
available in the materia medica at present.

A good post regards what antibiotics do in case of syphl.Well put.........Thanks.

Gina Tyler

__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein