otherhealth.com  

Go Back   otherhealth.com > Homeopathy > Homeopathy List Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 27th May 2006, 06:25 PM
Sheri Nakken
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales address to the 59thWorld Health Assembly

http://www.who.int/mediacentre/event.../en/index.html

Fifty-ninth World Health Assembly
23 May 2006

His Royal Highness The Prince of Wales address to the 59th World Health
Assembly


Monsieur le President, Directeur général par intérim, Mesdames et
Messieurs, je vous suis très reconnaissant de m'avoir invité à être parmi
vous aujourd'hui, et particulièrement touché que vous ayez souhaité que je
m'adresse à une si éminente assemblée de ministres et d'officiels venant de
nombreux pays.

Mr. President, Acting Director General, Ladies and Gentlemen, I am most
grateful to have been invited to speak to you today, and touched that you
should wish me to address such an eminent group of Ministers and officials
from around the world.

Before I begin however, I did just want to offer my deepest possible
sympathies to the wife and family of Dr Lee at this incredibly sad time and
to everyone who knew him. I had been greatly looking forward to meeting Dr
Lee once again who incidentally was instrumental in inviting me here today
and I was shocked and saddened, as I’m sure you all were, to learn of his
untimely passing.

Now, ladies and gentleman. Some of you who have had the doubtful experience
of hearing me speak on healthcare matters in the past may not be surprised
to hear me say that my theme today is that of integration. Today’s Assembly
to some extent represents the very embodiment of integration. But, beyond
this room, it seems to me that things are, I am sure you will agree, very
different. In many ways, and over rather too long a period, we have
maintained a dangerously fragmented and abstracted view of our world which
has led to the abandonment of a great deal of valuable traditional
knowledge and wisdom. As a result, we are beginning to reap the harvest we
have sown through living off Nature’s capital rather than her income. I
believe, Ladies and Gentlemen, that there is now a desperately urgent need
to redress the fragile, but vital balance between man and Nature through a
more integrated approach where the best of the ancient is blended with the
best of the modern. I am convinced that this is of increasingly crucial
importance when it comes to the collective health of people in all our
countries.

Of course none of what I say today should detract in any way from the
extraordinary success that modern medicine has achieved, particularly over
the course of the Twentieth Century, in preventing and treating such
terrible diseases as smallpox and polio. The biophysical model has served
us well, and continues to do so, for diseases from Tuberculosis to H.I.V.
But at the start of the Twenty-First Century we are still challenged by
frightening new pathogens threatening to cross the species divide, by the
tragedy of natural disasters and the health implications of military
conflicts and population migrations. In preventing and controlling such
suffering, we must think beyond the practice of reducing everything to
component parts, and this is where, I believe, modern medicine needs to
accommodate a more integrated and holistic approach.

To my mind, this is even more true in regard to long-term diseases. I have
heard them referred to as the “silent epidemic”, but the statistics speak
as loudly as those of infectious diseases. According to the World Health
Organization, of fifty-eight million annual deaths worldwide, a staggering
thirty-five million are the result of chronic diseases. They are now the
major cause of death among adults in almost every country of the world. In
the United Kingdom, the Government’s Department of Health has discovered
that eighty per cent of all consultations are taken up with chronic
complaints, which range from heart disease, stroke and diabetes to
depression and addiction.

None of us is immune. And it is vital to be very clear that these
conditions are not just diseases of affluence. They belong to rich and poor
alike.

I am told, for example, that in Nigeria thirty five per cent of women are
obese. In China, one hundred and sixty million people are reported to be
hypertensive; while in Asia, cases of diabetes will apparently rise by
ninety per cent over the next twenty years. In the United Kingdom, the
number of obese children is predicted to double over the next ten years.
Indeed, the Chief Executive of the United Kingdom’s Audit Commission
recently said that this alone will lead to a reduction in the overall life
expectancy of the next generation of British adults. Not only do these
conditions drastically reduce life spans, but they seriously compromise the
quality of many lives as well, causing people to become progressively ill
and debilitated. This acceleration in long term disease, it seems to me,
can be seen as the result of fragmented approaches to health which, in
turn, fail to produce that apparently most elusive quality, which is harmony.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I do believe most strongly that we should not view
poor health as something that exists in isolation, but which forms as a
direct consequence of our communities, our cultures, our lifestyles and the
way we interact with our environments. The state of our health reflects the
food we eat, the exercise we take, the water we drink, the air we breathe
and the quality of our housing and sanitation. I believe it also extends to
our social needs and circumstances – the need to belong to a community, the
need for meaningful work and daily purpose. The need in our lives for
dignity and kindness, for self-respect, for hope and, above all, for
harmony and, dare I say it, beauty. It encompasses the power of art, the
healing properties of loving human relationships and the role of the human
spirit. Human health is the sum of all these parts. If we reduce or
belittle these fundamental elements of life, are we not neglecting what it
is to be human?

Yet, too often, we appear to do just that, on a daily basis. The pollution
of our environment (in almost every sense) is widespread. As Sir Tom
Blundell, the former Chairman of the United Kingdom’s Royal Commission on
Environmental Pollution, put it in a report entitled “Chemicals in
Products”, - “Given our understanding of the way chemicals react with the
environment, you could say we are running a gigantic experiment with humans
and all other living things as the subject”.

If we poison and pollute our earth, we poison and pollute ourselves. Food
colourings and additives can cause a range of health problems in adults and
children; hydrogenated fats and unhealthy diets are linked to heart disease
and – frighteningly – the residue from pesticides used in conventional
farming methods can remain in our bodies for years.

In tackling these issues, I feel we need to be prepared to think radically
– and certainly beyond the range of conventional health approaches. I have
long felt that we have somehow lost touch with our instinct and intuition
for each other, and for our environment. The time has surely come to
appreciate that the complexity of chronic diseases requires considered and
multi-dimensional solutions. We must reconsider how we farm our land, how
we produce our food, how we build our cities and how we care for our
precious natural heritage. In future, for instance, it will not be enough
to boast that a new development of houses is merely cost or fuel-efficient.
We must ask: is it human-efficient? Does it encourage better physical and
mental health, satisfaction with life, or help to foster a genuine
community? Does it respond to the human need for beauty?

As few long term diseases are curable, we need also to think radically
about our objectives in improving the lifestyles of those who suffer from
chronic conditions. The need to prevent deterioration, to maximize the
quality of life and the ability of a patient to function, calls for a more
holistic approach – one which respects an individual’s choices, culture and
expectations.

This is where orthodox practice can learn from complementary medicine, the
West can learn from the East and new from old traditions. For the past
twenty-four years I have argued that patients should be able to gain the
benefit of the “best of both worlds” – complementary and orthodox – as part
of an integrated approach to healing. Many of today’s complementary
therapies are rooted in ancient traditions that intuitively understood the
need to maintain balance and harmony with our minds, bodies and the natural
world. Much of this knowledge, often based on oral traditions, is sadly
being lost yet, orthodox medicine has so much to learn from it. It is
tragic, it seems to me - and indeed to many people who have studied this
whole area - that in the ceaseless rush to “modernize”, many beneficial
approaches, which have been tried and tested and have shown themselves to
be effective, have been cast aside because they are deemed to be
“old-fashioned” or “irrelevant” to today’s needs.

There are clear examples which come to mind, particularly in the fields of
acupuncture and herbal medicines. While scientists try to learn more about
how acupuncture works, increasingly robust evidence, drawn from a number of
international studies, indicates that it does work, particularly for the
treatment of conditions such as osteoarthritis of the knee. It can,
according to the evidence, also alleviate the nausea and vomiting that can
be so debilitating for those taking anti-cancer drugs.

In the case of herbal applications such as St John's Wort (Hypericum
perforatum), which has been used since the time of the ancient Greeks,
about thirty clinical trials have shown some positive effects in treating
non-severe depression, with a remarkably low incidence of side-effects.
However, it is perhaps worth pointing out that just at the moment the world
begins to realise the immense value of Nature’s gift, in the management of
our health, the ecological or traditional habitats from which they come are
being rapidly destroyed as I speak. And if we are not very careful, we will
lose a vital life support system for future generations.

It seems to me, Ladies and Gentlemen, we all have so much to learn from
each other – whether we live in an affluent country or a developing one.
Hippocrates said “First, do no harm”. I believe that the proper mix of
proven complementary, traditional and modern remedies, which emphasizes the
active participation of the patient can help to create a powerful healing
force for our world.

In every treatment, the human attributes of compassion, empathy, touch and
rapport are as vital to the art of medicine and healing as they are to the
essence of humanity. An integrated approach gives each individual the means
and hope of contributing to his or her own healing. Integrated
practitioners provide time, empathy, hope and reassurance – the so-called
“human effect” – which can produce major changes in the immune system.
These changes can be demonstrated using brain scans, and provide scientific
clues as to how beliefs and emotions can influence our physical health and
sense of wellbeing. The “human effect” can, therefore, play a demonstrably
significant role in the whole approach to healing.

In the United Kingdom, my Foundation for Integrated Health has been the
leading champion of this integrated approach for the past eleven years.
Another of my organizations, the International Business Leaders Forum, has
been working with the W.H.O. on a number of projects aimed at, amongst
other things, finding ways of improving health through better diets and
increasing physical activity, in a number of countries.

My Foundation for Integrated Health has, as part of its approach,
encouraged better research and regulation of complementary medicine so that
patients can be confident of its safety and effectiveness. I am delighted
that F.I.H. is now also working with the World Health Organization and the
King’s Fund in London on a new project which has, as its main objective,
the aim of examining and exploring different approaches to the regulation
of complementary medicine worldwide.

The Foundation also has an awards scheme for integrated projects. I
recently visited one in a deprived inner city area which showed how an
integrated approach, involving acupuncture and other complementary
treatments, appears to have been particularly helpful for patients with
mental health problems. Recently, my Foundation has also created an
association of clinicians who are developing integrated approaches
throughout the U.K. What was once regarded as peripheral is increasingly
now seen as mainstream.

Now ladies and gentleman, the question, to my mind, should no longer be
whether healthcare services should be integrated, but how and how soon it
can be done? But you don’t just have to take my word for it… look at the
all indicators that there are around. For example, in the United Kingdom,
research in recent years has shown that fifty per cent of General
Practitioners are referring their patients to complementary Practitioners,
and, according to B.B.C. Television surveys, over seventy-five per cent of
patients would like to have the choice of a complementary as well as an
orthodox approach to their problem.

I very much hope that my Foundation will be able to work with and learn
from similar organizations in your own countries. Because, as I have said,
we all have so much to learn from each other. The humanitarian, theologian
and Nobel Peace Prize-winning doctor, Albert Schweitzer, said “The first
step in the evolution of ethics is a sense of solidarity with other human
beings”. The first steps in sharing our integrated solutions are, it seems
to me, happening already. I understand, for instance, that the World Health
Organization has been compiling a Global Atlas on the use of traditional,
alternative and complementary medicine, something which will be fascinating
to see as it develops. It does seem to me that this provides a useful start
for planning integrated health approaches across the world. The case of
Artemesia is a classic example of where real progress can be made. A
naturally growing plant, long used in China for treating Malaria, Artemesia
is now a treatment of choice in many parts of the World. I have also heard
that it is currently being grown in Africa and that the W.H.O. is working
to try to ensure that it will eventually become available to all who need it.

I have similarly been made aware of a programme called “Puente”, an
anti-poverty programme aimed at the poorest families in Chile. By adopting
an holistic approach that nurtures well-being through initiatives in
health, employment, housing and education, it appears that this initiative
is strengthening the health of families who are struggling to escape from
long-term poverty. Meanwhile, in the United Kingdom, what is known as 'the
Beacon Project' in Falmouth has shown that if you support and empower a
deprived community this can help to bring about improvements, including a
reduction in the incidence of asthma and post-natal depression as well as a
decline in the number of teenage pregnancies.

So ladies and gentlemen, together, we must find creative new ways of
developing an integrated approach to health that will encompass
nutritional, medical, agricultural, environmental and social policies. In
our battle against the complex problems of chronic disease, which could all
too easily overwhelm us in the years to come, and in our efforts to control
the global environmental crisis, we need to re-discover and re-integrate
some of the knowledge and well-tried practices that have been accumulated
over thousands of years.

I can only urge all health ministers, politicians and Government
representatives in this room today to abandon the conventional mindset that
sees health as solely the remit of a health department. In ancient China,
the doctor was only paid when the patient was well. In modern health
systems, perhaps your visible success should depend on health outcomes and
the degree to which health has become the responsibility of every single
department in your country’s Government. Only through collaborative
thinking can we paint a complete picture of world healing.

If that is not enough, I would like to leave you with a challenge – if I
may...

It seems to me that only through collaborative approaches can we develop
the best ideas and the best plans. Therefore, perhaps I could introduce a
challenge based on this idea and one which, I hope, will complement the
United Nation’s Millennium Development Goals. Could I suggest that each
country represented here today looks at the possibility, over the next five
years say, of developing its own integrated plan for future health and
care, perhaps beginning with a pilot or feasibility study…? If I may say
so, such a plan would reflect your disparate cultures and medical
traditions and would recognize the importance of all aspects of the natural
environment. It would be a plan that would integrate medical services with
individual and community approaches to health and self-care; a plan that
might build upon current examples of integrated health and care, which
exist everywhere. And if you ever get round to devising such a plan, why
not ask your Finance ministers to quantify the savings from this new and
emphatic focus on prevention as well as cure?

You might be interested to know on that score that last year I commissioned
a report in order to encourage a better informed debate about the
effectiveness of different therapies and treatments which might eventually
result in savings. The report, compiled by a British economist, Christopher
Smallwood, was published last October and it found evidence that
complementary approaches could help to fill gaps in some orthodox
treatments, particularly in relation to many chronic conditions such as
lower back pain, osteoarthritis of the knee, stress, anxiety and
depression, and post-operative nausea and pain. I am not here to tell you
what to do, but I would merely suggest that you might find a similar
approach helpful. I very much hope that, in time, some of you might allow
me to see what you are achieving.

Ladies and Gentlemen, I make these observations with the benefit of having
met and talked with people all over the world about health – but, of
course, you bring your own considerable expertise and that of your
Governments to this crucial issue. I can only provide you with a challenge
and some ideas – which might perhaps offer a little food for thought in the
midst of your deliberations.

I have already said that today’s burden of long term disease is, in part,
the legacy of having treated our bodies and our world as a collection of
unrelated components. But, of course, it is futile to rue the past. The
British Prime Minister, Winston Churchill, once wrote, “Of this I am quite
sure: If we open up a quarrel between the past and present, we shall find
that we have lost the future”. You, if I may say so, are the guardians of
that future. And the responsibility lies with us all to understand the
complex relationship of human health to our diverse societies, to our
modern lifestyles and to our fragile ecosystems.

Centuries ago, Plato said, “The cure of the part should not be attempted
without treatment of the whole”. Centuries later, the World Health
Organization recognized this principle in its 1948 constitution
(incidentally, the year I was born!), when it defined health as a “complete
state of physical, mental and social wellbeing”. Today, therefore, is our
chance to redefine our health systems so that they provide the balance and
connectedness that the Twenty-First Century so desperately needs.

Ladies and gentlemen, if we nurture the humane, guiding principles of
integrated health through combining the best of the ancient, well-tried
methods with the rigours of science and the technological imperatives of
our age, I believe we will be taking the first bold step in a new vision
for the future healthcare of the world. In that mission, you represent our
hope and I wish you every possible success.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Sheri Nakken, R.N., MA, Hahnemannian Homeopath
Well Within & Earth Mysteries & Sacred Site Tours (worldwide)
Vaccination Information & Choice Network
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/vaccine.htm
http://www.nccn.net/~wwithin/homeo.htm
homeopathycures (AT) tesco (DOT) net
ONLINE Introduction to Homeopathy Classes
ONLINE Introduction to Vaccine Dangers Classes
Voicemail US 530-740-0561 UK phone from US 011-44-1874-624-936



Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are Off
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New BB Rule on Multiple Identities jonh Homeopathy Discussion 20 6th May 2002 09:59 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:00 PM.



The information contained on OtherHealth.com arises by way of discussion between contributors and should not be treated as a substitute for the advice provided by your own personal physician or other health care professional. None of the contributions on this site are an endorsement by the site owners of any particular product, or a recommendation as to how to treat any particular disease or health-related condition. If you suspect you have a disease or health-related condition of any kind, you should contact your own health care professional immediately. Please read the BB Rules for further details.
Please consult personally with your own health care professional before starting any diet, exercise, supplementation or medication program.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2009 otherhealth.com