PC1 has been proved as a single remedy?
I cannot find the proving on his site
Can you let me know where it is?


regards


Simon King LCPH MARH

Where do you have this information from? I'm curious, because last I heard, Peter was assiduously avoiding saying what the remedy was made from, but I'd had the impression (quite possibly wrong) that it was a single remedy? Have you heard him speak to the issue?

Shannon

Hi Syed Ali, Whatever information is available about PC1 is on the website. MAybe you can read that for yourself?
There is no proving and it is not made from any material substance.
Eg; the remedies Luna, Xrays.

__________________
http://www.homeopathy2health.com

I have to say that I am very curious about these (quote unquote used loosely) remedies. If what the website says is true and this is a great revalation in homeopathy why does he not define the homeopathic application. Nothing... works for everybody exactly the same way. I find it impossible that if you take this one rememdy for 3 months exactly like he has defined then this will work for everyone the same.

I wouldn't support it until I understand what it is.. what potency of the "remedy" he is using...

Frustrating

Timothy Snider

Hi Timothy,

>From what is to be read on Peter's website, and what I could gather from seeing his personal presentation on PC1 about 2yrs ago in Berkeley, California, it is clear that PC1 (and his other "new" remedies) are neither classical nor homeopathy as we know it.

The only way for me personally to accept or support PC1 and Peter's "new technology" is to place it on it's own merit (not try to define it or judge it as-if it were homeopathy) -which primarily means: Look at the work that Didi & ABHA Light have done with it.. then decide if you'd like to trial it with an AIDS or HIV+ client, should the occasion present itself.

regards,

David Hartley www.holistiq.com
San Francisco EastBay (510)776-5914
---------------------

Well..
cardinal points of homeopathy - would certainly start with the proximate Latin meaning of the word homeopathy, which we generally translate:

Similar Suffering (homoios pathos)

medicinal substances are used according to homeopathic principal "cure likes with like" (similia simillibus curentur)

similitude of medicinal substances is establihed thru "pathogensis" -proving; so that we can see what power a remedy will have to heal (ie, that which the remedy can cause in a proving, it can remove in dis-ease)

single remedy is to be used (otherwise, obviously impossible to adhere to previous points)

Peter's PC1 fails on all these counts to "qualify" as homeopathic treatment -though it does clearly share the distinction of "energy medicine."

Energy medicine, broadly defined, would be anything used to heal.. which is dependant on "energetic" non-physical interaction.. mayhe one could say anything which is not based in bio-chemical interactivity.

Usually "spiritual healing" would come under its own category, leaving a number of recognized forms of energy medicine (the shortlist)

Homeopathy
Radionics and other similar (where Peter's PC1 falls closest)
Acupuncture, accupressure, Qi-Gong (Chi Kung, etc)
Cranio-sacral type of osteopathy (note: chiropractic work may sometimes have unintended/unmonitored energy-work effect.. in other words- COULD 'antidote' or otherwise interfere with energy-work)

The long-list would go on for pages, to satisfy everyone who wished to be included.

regards,


David Hartley www.holistiq.com
San Francisco EastBay (510)776-5914
---------------------


-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, August 30, 2004 11:59 AM

> Peter ..................... is doing "energy medicine"
> without any of the cardinal points of homeopathy incorporated

what do you mean by cardinal?
Tell me more about energy medicine, please!

Thanks

Dear Shannon,

I conceived the idea from his video lecture / briefing. Please let me know your address. I will send that lecture by email. Do you have capacity of 200 megabyte email space?

This means that you also know nothing about the remedy and you are also blank like me. But why are you speaking so loudly and in commanding tone like an authority of judgement. :D (no offense just kidding)

To clarify, for those that need it, the question implied, fairly obviously, was whether there was any information that others may have been privy to that wasn't on the site, perhaps from those that have worked with him?

regards

Simon King LCPH MARH

On 30 Aug 2004, at 16:13, doctorleela wrote:


> Whatever information is available about it is on the website. MAybe you
> can read that for yourself?

PC is very experienced and I can imagine, using radionics, that he has devised the equivalent of a genus epidemicus., or a similar approach. However, imagine here is the keyword, it is frustrating as you say, or perhaps more intriguing than frustrating, not to have some more specific information.

I don't know that we are necessarily being asked to support it at this stage, but to understand it would be nice.

regards

Simon King LCPH MARH