c'mon chris ! i had a good laugh reading your post !
these are *not* my views dear !
i use only LMs.
i think you did not read the second portion of my post at all, where all the anti LM arguements were answered. david little website and dr harimohun chowdhury's book says it all. i had sent the links.
as far as your arguement against low/high potency is concerned - this topic has been dealt with very nicely at :
http://www.marlev.com/homeo/Study%20...ibraryLMs2.htm
i had sent this link as well.
take care
dr manish agarwala

chris kurtz wrote:-
Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 12:02:36 +0200
Subject: AW: [H] are LM potencies low /useless ?
< SNIP>
As long as you don't do that you really shouldn't comment on LM potencies.
Best, -- Chris.



Yahoo! India Matrimony: Find your life partneronline.

Dr manish agarwala <vipassana_infonet@yahoo.co.in> wrote:

>c'mon chris ! i had a good laugh reading your post !
>these are *not* my views dear ! i use only LMs.

Sorry, I didn't intend my post to be a direct reply to yours. It is
sometimes difficult to figure out who the originator of a statement is once
it has been quoted and re-posted several times.

-- Chris.

it's ok chris.
i did not mind.
discussions of these kinds are important, in my opinion.
manish