From: Lynn Davis
To: homeopathy@homeolist.com
Subject: Diabetes


Hello,

Does anyone have any knowledge about how to treat borderline diabetes? Diabetes runs in my family but I don't have the disease but I sure do have issues with sugar. Since cancer, TB, syphyllis etc are miasms I was wondering if this falls under a miasm? I was also thinking that a homeopathic rememdy of table sugar may work but I'd like some input before I go experimenting on myself. The obvious solution is dietary control but I always like to get to the bottom if an issue to clear it out.

Thanks in advance,

Lynn Davis

From: Sheri Nakken
Subject: Re: Diabetes

The best, in my opinion, is to see a homeopath for constitutional treatment.

I'm currently treating a borderline child and having success so far.

There is no one answer for everyone, sorry to say. The right remedy for
your total symptom picture is what will help you.

Sheri

From: merrilee coblenz
Subject: Re: [H] Diabetes



A few days ago Sheri Naken posted a very interesting article about diabetes - diet related, omega's and various oils being the stressed culprits. It is in my mind connected to the Tub miasm, though the vaccines and merc. toxicity issues can play a huge part. Being hereditory, in your case, diet will assist in control. Saccharum Offic. (cane sugar) has a full proving but probably only useful in later diabetes pathology when the eye is involved, Glycerinum (glycerine - a sugar from amnimal fats) is also a remedy with a full picture which covers diabetes, no experimenting necessary :-). It needs to be treated along the lines of a chronic illness taking the whole picture.

merrilee

From: Sheri Nakken
Subject: Our Deadly Diabetes Deception



FYI.........

http://www.whale.to/a/smith.html

Our Deadly Diabetes Deception

Greed and dishonest science have promoted a lucrative worldwide epidemic of
diabetes that honesty and good science can quickly reverse by naturally
restoring the body's blood-sugar control mechanism.

Extracted from Nexus Magazine, Volume 11, Number 4 (June-July 2004)
PO Box 30, Mapleton Qld 4560 Australia.
Telephone: +61 (0)7 5442 9280; Fax: +61 (0)7 5442 9381

>From our web page at: www.nexusmagazine.com by Thomas Smith © 2004

PO Box 7685
Loveland, CO 80537 USA
Website: http://www.Healingmatters.com

Introduction
The Diabetes Industry
Diabetes History
Cure versus Treatment
The Commercial Value of Symptoms
Epidemiological Lifestyle Link
The Nature of the Disease
Orthodox Medical Treatment
Alternative Medical Treatment
Recovery Time
About the Author
Endnotes

Introduction

If you are an American diabetic, your physician will never tell you that
most cases of diabetes are curable. In fact, if you even mention the "cure"
word around him, he will likely become upset and irrational. His medical
school training only allows him to respond to the word "treatment". For
him, the "cure" word does not exist. Diabetes, in its modern epidemic form,
is a curable disease and has been for at least 40 years. In 2001, the most
recent year for which US figures are posted, 934,550 Americans died from
out-of-control symptoms of this disease.1

Your physician will also never tell you that, at one time, strokes, both
ischaemic and haemorrhagic, heart failure due to neuropathy as well as both
ischaemic and haemorrhagic coronary events, obesity, atherosclerosis,
elevated blood pressure, elevated cholesterol, elevated triglycerides,
impotence, retinopathy, renal failure, liver failure, polycystic ovary
syndrome, elevated blood sugar, systemic candida, impaired carbohydrate
metabolism, poor wound healing, impaired fat metabolism, peripheral
neuropathy as well as many more of today's disgraceful epidemic disorders
were once well understood often to be but symptoms of diabetes.

If you contract diabetes and depend upon orthodox medical treatment, sooner
or later you will experience one or more of its symptoms as the disease
rapidly worsens. It is now common practice to refer to these symptoms as if
they were separable, independent diseases with separate, unrelated
treatments provided by competing medical specialists.

It is true that many of these symptoms can and sometimes do result from
other causes; however, it is also true that this fact has been used to
disguise the causative role of diabetes and to justify expensive,
ineffective treatments for these symptoms.

Epidemic Type II diabetes is curable. By the time you get to the end of
this article, you are going to know that. You're going to know why it isn't
routinely being cured. And, you're going to know how to cure it. You are
also probably going to be angry at what a handful of greedy people have
surreptitiously done to the entire orthodox medical community and to its
trusting patients.

The Diabetes Industry

Today's diabetes industry is a massive community that has grown step by
step from its dubious origins in the early 20th century. In the last 80
years it has become enormously successful at shutting out competitive
voices that attempt to point out the fraud involved in modern diabetes
treatment. It has matured into a religion. And, like all religions, it
depends heavily upon the faith of the believer. So successful has it become
that it verges on blasphemy to suggest that, in most cases, the kindly high
priest with the stethoscope draped prominently around his neck is a
charlatan and a fraud. In the large majority of cases, he has never cured a
single case of diabetes in his entire medical career.

The financial and political influence of this medical community has almost
totally subverted the original intent of our regulatory agencies. They
routinely approve death-dealing, ineffective drugs with insufficient
testing. Former commissioner of the FDA, Dr Herbert Ley, in testimony
before a US Senate hearing, commented: "People think the FDA is protecting
them. It isn't. What the FDA is doing and what the public thinks it's doing
are as different as night and day."2


more at website - TOO LONG FOR the list

From: RobinMcKinley
Subject: Re: Diabetes



> A few days ago Sheri Naken posted a very interesting article about
> diabetes - diet related, omega's and various oils being the stressed culprits

I haven't read this yet (I will, I will, she gasps), but have you
(general-list-member-you) read about the new theory that suggests that skin cancer 'from the sun' also has more to do with a too-low level of the right omega oils?
The *demonisation* of sunlight in the last twenty (?) or so years has seemed to
me perverse; sunlight is also GOOD for you, and the chemicals in the sun
blocks are also, probably, BAD. I hope the oily theory is right.

Robin

From: tnewman
Subject: Re: Diabetes



Wow. I hadn't thought of it that way. (My thinking is still rooted in allopathic medicine - it's a slow process to change over.) But that makes a lot of sense. I mean, we were meant to be outside all day hunting and gathering, were we not? So why didn't all the prehistoric people die of skin cancer?

Interesting.

Tracy

From: Chris Newenham
Subject: Re: Diabetes



In New Zealand they say we get a hole in the ozone layer at certain times of the year. The ozone filters harmful rays and when this hole is over our country we are exposed to much greater doses than we should be. This is all due to global pollution, not around back then.

Cheers,
Chris

From: David Hartley
Subject: RE: Diabetes


I've heard from several sources that it is now thought that sunburn in
early childhood is the largest single causation of skin cancer
(NOTE: this is not homeopathic thought on causastion; it would be
interesting to know what percentages of the cases in this data-set were
mixed-miasm)

www.google.com/search?as_q=%22skin+cancer%22+exposure+childhood&n um=100&
hl=en

"British people should get out in the sun and not cover up for health
reasons"
http://www.news-medical.net/print_article.asp?print=yes&id=3071

Have been hearing for years that TFA's (trans fatty acids) are major
culprits (mutagenic) -whereas wholesome minimally processed oils, which
are not subjected to high temperatures are generally quite good as
healthy foods. Oils high in Omega 3 are thought to be an important
component of healthy diet, which may preclude development of cancers.
http://www.google.com/search?as_q=cancer+omega&num=100&hl=en


David Hartley

Subject: Re: Diabetes
From: Bob&Shannon



I think the issue wasn't just any sunburn, but blistered burns? (Tho I'm
sure any sunburn isn't helpful!)

Because prehistoric man ate grass fed meat instead of grain fed meat. Grass fed meat has many, mnay times more omega 3 fatty acids and conjugated linoleic acid than does grain fed meat.

__________________
Shirley Reischman