Hi All,
I would like any input about this.I have a bottle of a LM potency and i wonder what if i refill it with etilic alcohol, will it damage the original medication in any way?

Thanks,

Albert.

Clever question. I suppose there are hundreds of thousands of such questions. I don't think Hahnemann ever said why he used grain alcohol. I well imagine others are more reactive, but nobody really knows what happens to water and alcohol molecules that cause them to retain some mirror image of the original substance's etheric pattern and form into unique crystals, assuming Shui Yin Lo's accidental discoveries are valid, or form into unique polymers, assuming James H. Stephenson's brilliant hypothesis of the 1950s and '60s is instead correct. No money has come forth to offer us the means to do such experiments because everyone in power or who's rich is an allopathically brainwashed fool and complicit in mass murder. Do an original experiment. Stretch it out with that kind of alcohol and do a self-proving of it, and then report back. Very good question.

From my manuscript material, continuing from post #3 at WHAT ARE YOUR VIEWS?

"So, we’d destroy allopathic medicine every single time its authorities open their God-damned mouths, and they’ve got big mouths because they’re incredibly arrogant. After all, they kill all of their patients! What’s more arrogant than that?

"Sounds good, huh? All we’d need is CID. . .

"These allopaths who’re in search of a way to cure swim in money because medicine today is the exclusive profession of the rich. They wouldn’t come needing financial assistance, and their daddies and their rich friends would start financially supporting the school of the son’s choice because that’s what rich people do: They pour money on stuff because they think it will fix everything. So, money would come from all directions. The lion share of the original $1 billion would still be in the Trust Fund if not more from all of the profits and grants we’d precipitate.

"Therefore, research would be immediate, and we might even be able to start to seriously conceive of major research projects and get funding for them rather than dipping into the Trust Fund of the school. There’s lots of important research to be done in homeopathy. For instance, what’s up with homeopathic potentization (Table 3), camphor being the universal antidote for all of our mistakes and trituration? These are three big enigmas, and – I kid you not – they’re guaranteed to change the entire structure of chemistry and physics. The government should pay for it, but I need assistants and attorneys to do the paperwork to teach the legislators that this needs to be done. The government wants the cost of health care to come down, so they’d start giving us grants for our more expensive projects. We’d only lease the equipment unless special deals presented themselves to us, but most things can be done in farmed-out research elements to established institutions with equipment necessary for resolution of some major homeopathic mysteries if any are possible. Likewise, I’m sure we could get the government to demand the cooperation of both public and private institutions because this is a war we’ll fight against entrenched chronic diseases and psychiatric maladies in order to totally obliterate them from the face of the Earth and increase longevity to 144 years and beyond. Believe me, we could easily convince them by simply curing them because you can’t ever ignore the miraculous results of true homeopathic cure, and you can’t even imagine it. We could do it, and the sky’s the limit.

"Potentization would come first in this research. It’s not such a big deal to me because I understand it and don’t need more proof than I already have, but it would be nice to have and is long overdue of resolution. I’m a scientist, so I expect the worst in order to be prepared for it. Sounds contradictory, doesn’t it? I mean that we have to conduct this research so that other people could also understand it because everyone needs to understand homeopathy. We’d be looking to first prove that Shui Yin Lo’s room-temperature ice crystals are unique. If they’re unique, they’re not so-called 'relics,' which was used by allopaths to dismiss the finding. So, we first collapse that bullshit. I furthermore point out the importance of it being an independent finding by a guy who wasn’t even looking for it. [Extract this quote?] David Davidson best explains the importance of this in THE GREAT PYRAMID (1925) by introducing the following quote from Sir John Herschel in ON THE STUDY OF NATURAL PHILOSOPHY (1830):

“'The exponent of a theory, or the holder of a preconceived belief, must always be considered, from any critical point of view – whether friendly or hostile – as potentially and psychologically, though possibly unwittingly, biased in favour of evidence that accords with his theory or preconceived belief. This, it must be granted, is a fair statement of the mentality that should be adopted to consider logically any statement concerning the results of inductive analysis. It is not a statement, however, that can be applied in the particular instance of Petrie’s data – hostile to Smyth’s theories – confirming the latter in a manner never imagined by Smyth or any of his followers.

“'Of such cases, Sir John Herschel stated:

“'"The surest and best characteristic of a well-founded and extensive indection is, when verifications of it spring up, as it were, spontaneously into notice from quarters where they might be least expected, or from among instances of that very kind which were at first considered hostile. Evidence of this kind is irresistible, and compels assent with a weight that scarcely any other possesses.”'"

"Then we really tackle the problem. Are these polymers, or are they crystals? If neither, what are they? That’s got to be settled first to know what we’re looking for. I want polymers. It makes a difference. Polymerization would be good for everyone because water and alcohol molecules simply don’t normally ever do that, so it would be a major discovery. We’d go, 'Tada!' Newsman Bob would say, 'Something important has just been found by researchers in polymeric chemistry. It’s related to homeopathic pharmacology, and it’s going to change the world, so remember where you were at in this moment in history.'

"That assumes it’s what we’d find, but it looks like they’re actually crystals. We’ve got to settle this enigma first, though, and it’s must research! It’s not at all if we should do it; we must do it, period! So, expenses would be kept down, or it waits. This would be expensive and long-term research, but we’ve been waiting for two hundred years. What the heck? We wait longer if we don’t get any help. If humanity doesn’t want to know this stuff, we continue to wait until other than total morons are otherwise incarnant. We go to government mongrels on our hands and knees. They like people prostrated before them. We’d go, 'Please, oh-holy ruler [there’s a joke there, so dig for it], please, we need money for must research, so please help us.' That would work. Good, huh?

"The rich from all over the world would again start to come for treatment because that’s what they do. Here’s Maude nagging her husband, 'Harold, get rid of that bunion, you goofball. Go to those homeopaths, you knucklehead.' We’d cure them. They’d send their friends, piles and piles of them. We’d cure them. Big piles of cured rich people would each send ten more people each year and gazillions of dollars to open new schools and hospitals, so we’d finally start to again make a dent in these 6½ billion uncured people who just exude symptoms as diseased individuals from birth. The money would thus start piling up from that end, too. We’d have to make serious decisions about how to best spend it.

"New schools come first because they produce more homeopaths, and that’s the priority since the world clearly needs at least 30 million homeopaths, maybe 50 or even more. There are only 10 million allopaths, but they don’t do anything, so there’s no calculus with those quacks. More schools. We’d just do it. The $1 billion would probably grow rather than deplete. We need seed money. Send me buckaroos.
"Bill and Linda Gates, what the Hell is wrong with you two that you want to pollute hundreds of millions of innocent children with viruses? Listen, you ignorantly evil knuckleheads, because one of the wastes of space who’re your assistants should have shown you this before you wasted all of that money and did such a tremendously evil thing. See the charts in Thomas McKeown’s THE ROLE OF MEDICINE: MAGIC OR MYTH? (1971). Now, send me buckaroos, you ignorantly evil knuckleheads (Appendix 1, definition of sincerity). Fetch!

"If you don’t, I’ll leave this country, and you’ll then only have three Hahnemannians (Appendix 4). The United States is pretty pitiful and pathetic, isn’t it? What are you going to do when (and this is not an if it comes but an inevitability when it comes) a viral pandemic like the Bird flu slams into the United States? Allopaths don’t have any cures for viral infections; only homeopaths have cured them. Answer: About one-half to two-thirds of you will die premature and ghastly agonal deaths as it sweeps the globe and you brain-damaged and brainwashed morons ignore us and finally get the hell off of the planet. That’s the future as it presently exists. Change it; ketchup!

"That’s what happened in 1830-33 with the Asiatic-cholera pandemic. Never heard of it, have you? It was a ghastly disease, but most people have acquired immunity to it, so it will probably never again trouble us. Hahnemann foresaw it becoming a pandemic due to the British Empire, so he warned us and the rest of the world and told which drugs to use in it. It meandered into Europe by the British in early 1831 and devastated the continent, and it then slammed into the United States through all ports in late 1831 and early 1832. It took out one-third of the population of the Earth and half of most metropolitan areas. Homeopathic patients survived. The handful of Hahnemannians in the U.S. and about twice as many in Europe took it upon themselves to inform the public about which drugs to use in their affected households by buying newspapers space with these announcements. Because he’d studied the reports of the deaths in the Far East, Hahnemann knew that Cuprum metallicum (dynamized copper via trituration and then ordinary potentization – Table 3) would be almost specific for most cases, and he named two other drugs for variant symptoms. He was absolutely right. About 30-50 million people paid attention to these announcements and followed our advice. They also survived unless they waited too long. Not quite a couple dozen guys thereby saved 30-50 million people.

"They, of course, flocked to us when it was all over, and the rich threw money at us. 'Build hospitals!' they said. We have to first teach the doctors, we said. 'Okay, build schools and hospitals.' We weren’t ready for this. We’re not administrators. The schools thus weren’t very successful at turning out Hahnemannians because we tried to do too much, too quickly and with too few Hahnemannians. Consequently, very few actual Hahnemannians ever came out of the 23 American homeopathic medical schools primarily because lots of pseudo homeopaths had joined our ranks and became the instructors in the schools. We attempted to teach these ignorantly allopathic instructors through our medical journals by reaching the most in the best way, but they wouldn’t listen to us any more than the ignorant GVs will today (Figures 1, 4, 9 & 10, Tables 2 & 3 and Appendices 10-12, 28, 34, 44, 48, 51, 52, 58 & 62). They were practicing allopathic medicine with our drugs, meaning a drug for a disease. They also flocked to us after the Asiatic cholera had humbled the entire world. They’d successfully used our drugs and thought the same specificity exists in chronic diseases and psychiatric cases, but it doesn’t work like that because those require the discernment of the all-important uncommon symptoms of a case (Table 7) in order to find the most similar remedy. They couldn’t ever grasp this core of homeopathic thinking demanded by the Law of Similars (Tables 4-7), but they called themselves homeopaths, anyway. These were low-potency pseudo homeopaths (LPHs – Figure 1). They overflowed our ranks and a mere 47 years later, in 1880, forced us to found the International Hahnemannian Association after running us out of our own institution, the American Institute of Homeopathy, which was founded three years before the American Medical Association (AMA). In fact, the AMA was formed by an evil allopath who was pretty much alone for its first 50 years since he mostly only used the platform of the Journal of the AMA to slam homeopathy while advocating bloodletting. Strange but true. We thus concentrated our efforts on the medical journals and kept up our own overwhelming practices and the clamor of LPHs in our ranks. The LPHs had gained control over British homeopathy and thus constantly misled the American LPHs. Hahnemannians only rarely taught in any of these homeopathic medical schools because we were too few and overwhelmed, so there wasn’t much real homeopathy taught in them.

"We won’t make this mistake when the next pandemic hits the Earth because those were all big mistakes we’ve more than learned from. In fact, those mistakes were what actually allowed the infamous FLEXNOR REPORT (Coulter, 1973) of 1910 to destroy American Homeopathy. All of the Hahnemannians had died by the mid-1890s, so there wasn’t anybody to stand the stead of that concerted allopathic attack, and American Homeopathy was consequently destroyed. I’ll pick this up yonder (¾®) in Parts __ & __.

"Although this is just an excuse to explain away the insanity of the 3000-year allopathic monopoly, pandemics are the way Nature culls the expanding population of a planet of doctors without cures, and we’re certainly vulnerable to it, aren’t we? The United States is pretty pathetic, isn’t it? None of you know any of the important stuff to avoid getting dead from allopathic thinking because you only think in an allopathic way, don’t you? I’m trying to fix that, but I’ll leave this country if you don’t assist me because I know of a few countries with people who’d like me and want to help because they already know that homeopathy works but don’t have any Hahnemannians. Everyone wins when you help us help the world.

"I’m just a guy typing. I can’t do anything here but tell you what could be done. Be amazed: Go see the photos of our schools and hospitals in William Harvey King’s 5-volume HISTORY OF HOMEOPATHY AND ITS INSTITUTIONS IN AMERICA: THEIR FOUNDERS, BENEFACTORS, OFFICERS AND ALUMNI, ETC., WITH A RECORD OF ACHIEVEMENT OF ITS REPRESENTATIVES IN THE WORLD OF MEDICINE (1905). We did it before, and we’ll just do it again.

"The schools of the GVs and the waiting lists to get into those small and pseudo homeopathic schools show that the students exist. They simply don’t know that the GVs are mere quasi homeopaths because nobody else tells them, and all of the GVs think they’re the real thing. In a pig’s eye! In fact, Hahnemann himself called their kind 'beginners, bunglers and aggravators of diseases' exactly 150 years before they came onto the world scene in 1978. Case closed. Ketchup!

"Specifically, Hahnemann described and summarily dismissed high-potency and low-potency pseudo homeopaths (HPHs and LPHs – Figure 1) in a mere three paragraphs of THE CHRONIC DISEASES, and that’s the only place whatsoever in the whole of his magnificent literature where he mentioned HPHs, today called GVs because of George Vithoulkas. He didn’t much more often refer to the LPHs, and that was always in derision.

"He called the LPHs 'mongrels.' That was the quasi-polite way of saying they’re bastards. It wasn’t polite then, though, because the word bastard, I think, hadn’t yet been developed. So, he had nothing good to say about LPHs since they’re just allopaths. Ready, Eddie? To Hell with them! There are more of them than you can shake a stick at. People also constantly fall for their lies about 'using homeopathy' because they don’t know what it means any more than do the LPHs. Such patients thus always say, 'Homeopathy didn’t work.' Bullshit! Allopathy doesn’t work, and you can’t get it to work just by using homeopathically potentized drugs because the key thing is to find the simillimum ('thing most similar') and the minimum dose (Table 3). Those fools are allopaths, so they will not accept that ultramolecular potencies might work. They never test for it, not even a single high-potency self-proving, even though that’s guaranteed to extinguish all doubt about our ultramolecular pharmacology. If they ever did that, it would go something like this:

“'Hmm . . . what’s this? What are all of these symptoms? These match the drug I took a few days ago. I have inexplicable anxieties about leaving my home, ineffectual urination, real nightmares about truly scary stuff, itching skin that won’t stop, dry mouth and some peculiar shooting pains across my body, across entire organs – how did that happen?'

"We thus tell them:

“'Good man! Hahnemann used a Latin expression for that experience. He closed some letters with it: Aude sapere, 'dare to taste and understand.' Now you know about the real nature of disease, and I’m about to explain the real nature of therapeutics if you’ll let me (Figures 9 & 10). Do it again but in higher potency, and keep doing it, each time upping the potency, until you know this drug like a friend. It will take you a month or two with the study, but you’ll thereafter generally spot it real quick. You can’t do very many of these in a lifetime because it takes a month or two to do it and figure out each drug you prove from studying the thousands of symptoms you did not experience but others have. You want to thoroughly understand the thing so as to gain command over this element of our therapeutic armamentarium against unnecessary human and animal suffering in order to so much better know the drug when you need to prescribe it. Patients will say things that you can’t otherwise understand, but you will when you experience it. It’s then not just words on paper. Also, they say them in different ways than exist in the books. You’ll understand this medicine and the people who need it if you thoroughly do this, so the different ways they say things will be no real problem because you’ll see their need for this drug from an overview perspective, a gestalt that’s the whole drug, everything about it. You’ll learn to think of these mental constructs of our drugs as your friends because you really know them, I mean, really know them! For instance, and I love this one, Hitler simply needed Anacardium orientale. Imagine that. They’re all like that. You’ll spot famous people who need or needed the drug you’re proving. You’ll never forget these things.

“'If you don’t prove the drug, you get problems. You read their symptoms in the materia medica, and they’re so complicated that you go, ‘What the hell does all this mean?’ But experience it, and you’ve got it. Snap your fingers, it’s that quick. The words in the text then have meaning. You start to penetrate what’s meant by the symptoms of other drugs without having to do provings of them, especially if they’re cognates of the drug you proved. Cognate basically means similar. Lots of drugs compete in our case analyses because they’re cognates. You have a bunch of symptoms, and you’re going to see these hundreds of cognate groups come up in repertorization (cross-referencing) because they’re similar in some of their symptoms. So, you then won’t have to prove a whole bunch of other drugs because they’re cognates. You just have to thoroughly do a key one. Simple, huh? You’ll always want to, but you can’t. We don’t live long enough for that. There are over 2600 homeopathic drugs, so it’s impossible. That’s how you get around it. So, you took a major step. Good man!

“'You’ve just put onto yourself an actual state of consciousness, only you’re still there inside of it just watching what’s going on. You took this guy’s skin and virtually stepped inside it, and his Mind is there, too. It’s amazing, absolutely amazing! It totally blows my mind every time I do a proving, and it never fails to do so, either. You’re a doctor, so you see this objectively, and yet you experience it, too. Can it get any better than that? Hell no! Homeopathy is perfect, absolutely perfect! The doctor in you is amazed. You experience the psychological disturbances of unnatural passions and disordered memory and clouded thought with minute details that are the very keys to cure. All of the uncommon symptoms (Table 7) from skin to mind best stick out during self-provings, especially in high-potency self-provings (Table 3), but you’ve got to step to them slowly or you’re simply overwhelmed with stuff you don’t so well understand. It therefore takes at least two months to do a good self-proving. But you put this guy’s brain inside of your brain and his skin on top of yours, and you experience what it is to be him. Thus, you’ve got it! Traditionally, you’re now hooked, for you can’t ignore this no matter what your logic says. Welcome to our world. Moreover, welcome to the future! Aude sapere!'

"They never do it, they never engage in a single high-potency homeopathic self-proving, and they thus remain ignorant and opposed to homeopathy simply because somebody told them that the medicines should not have effect 'because they could only be placebos.' What would have happened if Newton had ignored the apple bonking him on the head? He would have never connected the dots. He didn’t say that, for instance, 'It’s impossible for there to be an invisible force attracting smaller bodies to larger bodies.' Everybody else said that, but not Newton. We wouldn’t have the Laws of Motion if Newton had used a priori logic that’s obviously flawed. The entire world said, 'Invisible force? Are you out of your mind? The Church will start investigating you if you say that. They torture people and burn them at the stake. They’ll brand you a witch. Besides, show me this invisible force.'

"I always like the last remark the best. It’s amazing the things we’ve accepted, isn’t it? Believe me, there are lots and lots more fundamental forces of nature than the ones presently recognized by school physicists, but they’re just bozos messing around with the inanimate world, and even it perplexes them. They’re all just idiots. That’s child’s play compared to homeopathy, and then there’s the Brotherhoods’ Philosophy, Cosmology and Archives (Figures 2 & 3). Zowie that!

"Hahnemann explained it all; every single little thing about homeopathy, he explained it all. It’s absolutely amazing. Newton didn’t explain the whole of physics. Dalton didn’t explain the whole of chemistry. Galileo didn’t explain the whole of celestial mechanics. Planck didn’t discover the whole of quantum physics, although he probably outranks the other three in the depth, extent and importance of his discoveries. That’s how quickly you run out of competing magnificent discoveries that are not even remotely close to what Hahnemann did: The entirety of the actual Science of Medicine (Tables 4-7) was rediscovered by one guy. It’s absolutely amazing! Therefore, he must have been an Initiate (Figure 2). I’ll tell you why later.

"Our many detractors for 217 years have never tested homeopathy in the only way possible without homeopathic expertise. They’ve never engaged in a single high-potency self-proving. Consequently, there’s no aude sapere in their life. They just remain ignorant their whole lives. 'Hitler needed Anacardium orientale? What does that mean?' Yada yada or aude sapere, which one’s better? So, they still don’t do it. It’s now 217 years since Hahnemann rediscovered homeopathy, and it’s 210 years since he published the first paper of homeopathy. All that time, none of these people, who’re supposed to be scientists, have done this one thing required to test homeopathy.

"You can’t test homeopathy against diseases unless you’re a Hahnemannian, for you’ll never find the right medicine. 'But the repertory says this drug is good against lupus.' Yeah, and along with how many hundreds of others? 'Huh?' They don’t get it. It’s not for the disease, you fool; it’s for the patient! You’re not curing a disease; you’re curing a patient! The diagnostic categories of diseases don’t even exist because nobody, absolutely nobody has only those symptoms. What the hell is wrong with everyone that they don’t understand this? Those things are just linguistic conveniences. We say the name of a disease, and we immediately know all of these symptoms used to define it. It has no more function than that, though, because it’s just a statistical abstraction of reality.

"Show me cancer. You can’t do it. It’s a long explanation, so I’ll give just the short of it. . . ."

That's continued in the other posting. I think it reads well, and I don't need anyone else to tell me so, either. It's very tough to say accurate things about homeopathy, but they live forever when we get it right. If you don't like it, you're destined to a grizzly awful death and the consequences of complicity in mass murder, so what can we care what such people think when Christ Himself condemned them? I hope you like it, but I wish you'd keep your praises to yourself since I don't know what to do with them. Homeopathy is such a magnificent subject, and it will put you hundreds of years ahead of your time. Imagine that.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B
www.GiggleBoggleJabbleGooby.com/HaHa