otherhealth.com  

Go Back   otherhealth.com > Homeopathy > Homeopathy Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 16th August 2008, 04:54 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 62
myankle is on a distinguished road
Default What are your views ?

As someone who knows the full effects of being poisoned by Aluminium

In flicking through a pile of Homeopathic books that were given to me I was interested to see so many incredibly different descriptions of Alumina

A statement in a Materia Medica by JH Clarke says:

"Teste groups Alumina with Sepia and Copavia"
" He considers it the chronic of Sepia as Silica is of Pulsatilla"

Interested to see this forums members discussion on same
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 16th August 2008, 09:06 AM
gavinimurthy's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: India
Posts: 326
gavinimurthy is on a distinguished road
Default

You can download the book by Teste and findout yourself.

The Homoeopathic Materia Medica ... - Google Book Search

Very interesting book.

Murthy
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 16th August 2008, 06:58 PM
Hahnemannian444's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 307
Hahnemannian444 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Sweetheart, Alumina is porceline clay. Hahnemann's father worked in porceline as one of the world's foremost artisans of a group of German porceline makers all antique collectors know, and Hahnemann noticed that the stuff produces symptoms as a poison, but it's not aluminum, and the provings are from ultramolecular stuff with no chemical relationships -- something true of all homeopathic medicines. It's abreviation is Alum.

Alum-m. is the abbreviation for Aluminium metallicum, metalic aluminum. The mistake is understandable, but you won't find homeopathic antidotes for chemical poisonings because these are energized, dynamized, potentized, ultramolecular drugs. They're etheric medicines that essentially exist in Heaven since the Etheric Plane of existence is the second plane. They all coincide in the same space, and that's why something invisible is gone at death. These things are not difficult to understand, but you'll never get to them with allopathic thought because it's inherently locked into philosophical materialism, mechanism and reductionism. They know absolutely nothing accurate about the nature of existence or the nature of the universe, so it's no suprise that they know nothing accurate about the nature of health, disease and therapeutics, either. Nonetheless, you're looking at the wrong medicine if you're looking for a potentized form of aluminum.

All we can do with poisons is remove them and then prescribe without those avoidable disease agents and influences. Unfortunately, the heavy metals remain for a long time because our bodies only have two antioxidant enzymes to gobble them up like amoebas, but it's quite rare for them to show deleterious effects or for us to know them because nobody has bothered to fully research other than about 25 of the 200,000(+) products of industrial chemistry.

The question remains, what makes you think you're suffering from aluminum poisoning? Everyone wants to attribute symptoms and diseases to causes. What for? Once diseases have manifested, it make no difference. They run their course to death or insanity unless cured, so the only thing that matters is cure. We need to know toxicology to prevent poisonings, but diseases are quite unique as products of the organism protecting itself, especially chronic diseases. That's Article 201 of the ORGANON OF MEDICINE [http://homeopathyhome.com/reference/.../organon.html], a rather complex statement that essentially says the organism keeps disturbance as much as possible on the periphery. It always progresses unless cured, though, and that's why people die the tragic deaths they do today. It's iatromega-genocide because the doctors can't cure and yet throw poisons into already weakened people. From my manuscript material:

“These discoveries are totally meaningless because determining the cause is not the means of cure. You can’t get around that one fact because they don’t have any cures, and we do. We’re a country and an entire world, in fact, of doctors without cures. That’s insane, absolutely insane! The function of the physician is to cure, but they can’t cure, so it’s insane. Okay, strike one! That was easy, huh?

“Moreover, it’s impossible (what’s more than impossible?) for there to be a first cause in chronic diseases and psychiatric cases because the organism is doing it to itself, and thus everything determined or ‘discovered’ (they like that word) to be the proximate cause of these diseases (meaning that whatever is discovered to be the first chemical reaction in the chemical flow charts – which they give a fancy term and call it ‘the disease mechanism’ – of chronic diseases and psychiatric maladies) will be an effect, will be an effect, will be an effect. I obnoxiously repeated it because it’s really important.

“We therefore ask them this insoluble and mieutic question about this stuff: What caused the first chemical reaction? They’re always silent, so we push it. What caused the first chemical reaction that you’re calling the cause of the disease? Everybody is so incredibly allopathically brainwashed that they go, ‘Huh?’ They don’t get it. It’s as obvious as can be, but they don’t get it.

“Pavlov, my buddy, come over here and tell these people what that means.” “It means they’re dingdongs!” “Not exactly what I was looking for, but that’s good enough. Thanks a lot, pal. No wonder he figured stuff out, huh?

“So, we’d constantly drill this fact into the public mind along with everything else. They’d finally get it; believe me, they’d get it because we’re good at it. The public would then start asking questions of allopathic medical authorities. They’d go, ‘Ah, Mr. doctor, we’re giving you all this money for what?’ Tip of the iceberg. Their house of cards falls down if you so much as breath on it. Poof! The whole theoretical edifice of allopathic medicine in chronic and psychiatric cases crumbles whenever you look at it. If you breathe on it or look at it, it disintegrates. God forbid you touch it. The God-damned thing is probably booby-trapped and would blow up. Strike two!

“Here we go. This is a goodie: We cure. Strike three! You’re out! What the Hell is going on? What’s wrong with everyone? Why are you believing these quacks? Why are you even listening to them? Where’s the precedent for absolute incompetence being the standard of excellence? They tell us they’re quacks. I’ve thoroughly proven that from their own mouths. Oh yeah, strike four! Get the Hell out of here!

“What the Hell’s going on? Ahh . . . here come the Nazis to the rescue. Odd sounding, isn’t it? Scary as Hell is what it is. Heir Hitler, tell these people what that means.” “Izt brainwashing, mass brainwashing!” “Yeah, he’s succinct, too. Thank God Hahnemann wasn’t.

“So, we’d destroy allopathic medicine every single time its authorities open their God-damned mouths, and they’ve got big mouths because they’re incredibly arrogant. After all, they kill all of their patients. What’s more arrogant than that?

“Sounds good, huh? All we’d need is CID. . . .

“Greetings from OZ!

“We back up one paragraph and go on. Here we go.

* * *

“Show me cancer. You can’t do it. It’s a long explanation, so I’ll give just the short of it. I said you can’t show me cancer, and I imagined 6˝ billion people envisioning the aggressively subdividing cells of cancer or tumors and saying, ‘What the hell are you talking about, show me cancer? It’s vile, but of course it’s there.’ It’s a profound philosophical issue, and it was unfair of me because you have no idea of where I’m coming from when I said it even though I surely made this fact perfectly clear at strike one, strike two. Look, I again ask the important mieutic question here: When does cancer begin? Get this: It’s impossible to say that the tissue and cellular changes of cancer (or any other chronic disease or psychiatric malady) are cancer because it started before that since the organism did it to itself.

* * *

“People should not have difficulty with this, but they always do because of brainwashing, more properly called conditioning. Tell them, Pavlov.” “I say a word, and you react.” “Wow, he did it again. German trait, huh?” “Yeah.” “Funny guy. I like him. Very smart, and way ahead of his time.

“I’ll try again. The organism does it to itself, so that outcome is just the effect of some hopelessly unidentifiable series of steps and stages of pathological development that finally pop out and result in the disease’s externalization from the invisible to the physical, the invisible being proven by death (and lots of other natural phenomena) since everything physical is still there. That should be clear, but it almost never is due to allopathic brainwashing to the 5 primary subjects of medicine (Figures 9 & 10, Tables 3-7 & Appendix 59).

“I’ll show you how brainwashed you are. I just referred to stages of pathological development. You presume that pathological means tissue changes or changes in fluids, right? Wrongo, daddyo! Pathology simply means, ‘study of suffering.’ We have it mean study of diseases in allopathic terms because that’s usually what suffering is, but it’s a very bad idea to corrupt your own language and an especially bad idea to react conditionally and presume due to ignorance, so ketchup! Diseases can only make themselves known to our senses by signs and symptoms, but symptoms are always prior to any tissue changes – always! Pathological stages therefore include everything prior to the onset of diseases in allopathic terms. I hope that’s clear.

“Pavlov, give it another go, please. And try harder this time, guy.”

“Sure. The constructs we give to things define our reality. I say ball, and you envision it. It’s part of communication with very specific definitions, some of them quite complex and requiring years and decades to command in understanding. Are every one of these definitions correct, or are we still learning stuff? Obviously, we are. Therefore, some of the definitions are wrong, some quite wrong.

“The calculus he wants me to get to is the measure of accuracy. In medicine, it’s cure, pure and simply, and nothing more because that’s the function of medicine, and there’s no point in doctors doing anything unless diseases are cured since the nature of medicines as poisons means that physicians are then just adding poisoning effects to already weakened patients unless they’re using the Law of Similars, which transforms poisonous medicines into remedies that cure. They don’t yet know how their medicines cure, but the evidence is irrefutable and quite old and continuous over the last 217 years plus over many millennia through the three previous forms of homeopathy. It’s very impressive, and they soundly argue that it’s the actual Science of Medicine due to 10 Laws of Medicine (Tables 4-7), 9 of which are specific to homeopathy. That’s a very interesting conjunction with the 9 Laws of Economy (Table 1) that some of them, my friend being one, directly argue in favor of.

“I’m much intrigued after a few months of reading quite a lot on it by his assignment because he said, ‘Stay away from high- and low-potency pseudo homeopathy’ (Figure 1), so he’s been having me read Hahnemann’s Lesser Writings together with the Organon of Medicine, his personal cross-references and annotations in the two books being extremely fascinating and revealing of a vast complexity that does not yet seem to have logical flaws or inconsistencies. They are so far very nice arguments, and the man had very clear and advanced thinking. I particularly like the fact that he was German from before my time. He was obscure in my time, so I never knew much about him. It seems a grave oversight now.

“So, the upshot is that you can define diseases all you want ‘til the end of time, but there’s no point unless cures result; and – this is very important – cures don’t result in allopathic medicine, which they thoroughly and, indeed, constantly admit. So, odds are that they simply have everything totally wrong (Figures 9 & 10), or they’d get some cures. How’s that?”

“Yes, sir, I knew you could help me. Thank you. My hero. That was perfect.

“Okay, I’ll try it again with that lead. You envision a vile beastie of wild cellular division and scary and foreign growths with the word cancer, and well you should. That’s understandable, but that’s only because allopathic medicine has set the parameters to define cancer as – this is very important – the instant the tissues start going bonkers, but that’s wrong. Think about it. Where did it come from? All of the signs and symptoms that precede and eventually result in cancer cells are obviously also part of the causal train of physiological and psychological abnormalities in the general sense and adverse chemical reactions in the particular sense that finally pop out, most of the time decades later, into the defined thing called cancer.

“Allopathic theory immediately has a huge number of totally insoluble problems right there at the very start of their logic. First of all, they name these diseases by diagnostic categories (Parkinson’s, lupus, cancer, diabetes, etc.) rather than calling suffering by the drug that proves to be the remedy. We, on the other hand, say, for instance, this person is a Sepia patient or needs Lycopodium, Nux vomica, Sulphur or any of the 2600(+) drugs now in our pharmacopia and materia medica (‘materials of medicine’). We don’t say he or she is a cancer patient except to define a large portion of the case for disease diagnostic use, but that’s of absolutely no therapeutic value because cancer as a diagnostic category only refers to the common symptoms (Table 7), whereas the name of the remedy refers to the whole case and thus also to the all-important uncommon symptoms by which we determined the remedy for the person regardless of the named disease. We call it a remedy diagnosis (to ‘thoroughly know’ something). I admit that’s a peculiar concept to the allopathically brainwashed, and I know it well because I was also that way, but it’s the only one that both makes sense and fits reality. Although it’s rare for us to use the term, all homeopaths know that we use remedy diagnoses because we do thoroughly know both the symptoms that the medicines produce, and we’re skilled in discerning and collecting the symptoms of the patient, which we simply match up to most similarity (Tables 4-6).”

I hope that's understood, but it unfortunately rarely is because everyone is totally brainwashed to allopathic constructs about health, disease, therapeutics and the nature of existence and the nature of the universe. The obvious thus never occurs to them.

Nonetheless, the actual cause of all diseases will always be the organism itself, so allopathic ideas about causes will always find those people attempting to attack the thing that caused the disease. That's crazy! Hence, we see patients still further weakened by such high-interference onslaughts to health, all of which produce even more symptoms as side effects because they're all poisons. The same calculus exists for psychotherapy because you're just going to suppress diseases if you adopt the brainwashing cliches, platitudes and slogans of modern psychology, part of hydra-headed allopathy. It's more complicated with such intellectualizations, but it's very apparent with their chemical drugs because they're all poisons and never transform into remedies because only the Law of Similars produces such reactions of the organism. Carve that in stone.

Diseases and poisonings are completely different processes, which is evidenced by symptoms ceasing once the poisons are removed. That's not true of diseases, expecially chronic diseases, for they terminate in death or insanity unless cured. Therefore, seeking the supposed causes of diseases is simply a dead-end approach to cure. Moreover, all homeopathic experience has proven that unambiguously matching symptoms produces cures. That makes therapeutics and allopathic studies of pathology (a corrupted word) completely unrelated subjects. Allopaths hold otherwise, but they have no cures for other than bacterial infections, which means they can't cure 99.999% of all deadly illnesses in industrialized societies. People tell you that they're therapeutic incompetents, and yet you listen to them? Tell me why.

Hahnemann untied the Gordian knot of therapeutics 218 years ago, but the only people who've noticed are Hahnemannians and high-potency pseudo homeopaths, who're more generously called quasi homeopaths because they do have most things correct and are actual students of homeopathy. The fact that they don't realize their mistakes and don't realize they're still students is a mega-problem for Hahnemannians, but it's always been that way. Nobody else has noticed. Everyone accepts the death sentence of virtually every diagnosis by allopaths, and they accept that these people are doctors without cures who further admit to creating all of the diseases they cannot cure. We've been saying those three things from the very beginning, and now they finally admit them. And yet people still listen to these self-admitted quacks? What's wrong with this picture? Socrates whispered in my ear and wants to ask a question: "In what other sector of society do we accept total incompetence as the standard of excellence?" Cute, huh? I'm serious, though. Doctors without cures is an abomination, so don't listen to them.

As for what you describe as incredible differences, you're talking about a polychrest, a drug with "many useful purposes." They all have over 5000 symptoms, and all evidence indicates they will eventually cure all diseases. You're not going to understand the homeopathic materia medica as a novice because it's too massive. Every drug will eventually develop into a polychrest, and all evidence is that every substance in the entire universe becomes a medicine when homeopathically potentized. You just get used to this stuff. Likewise, Clarke was just a low-potency pseudo homeopath. You'll find a different set of mistakes from high-potency pseudo homeopaths. Then, there are the works of Hahnemannians. All of that contributes to confusion in allopathic thinkers, and then there's the fact that chronic diseases are infinite in number. Do you think someone who thinks allopathically is going to understand such things? No, never, and that sustains the status quo of iatromega-genocide in our times.

Getting people to think homeopathically is imperative. I try, and all Hahnemannians have tried all of their lives. American homeopathy was destroyed by the infamous FLEXNOR REPORT of 1910, but the main reason was because all of the Hahnemannians had died by the late 1990s. There thus wasn't anyone who hold us together, and allopaths took advantage of that weakness. Was it any fault of the Hahnemannians that nobody took their places? Not that I can see from the evidence for untiring efforts to teach homeopathy. What keeps others from thinking homeopathically? Allopathic thinking, of course. Why do they think that way when none of it makes any sense and doesn't produce any cures? Of course, only brainwashing can answer that question. Everyone in the entire world is allopathically brainwashed. How do you fix that? One at a time because only individuals can collapse the adopted falsehoods of their views.

Aluminum poisoning? Who says so, and what difference does it make, anyway? A disease-diagnostic category means nothing in therapeutics, so just forget it. What symptoms are being dumped into the term aluminum poisoning, and what uncommon symptoms are hiding there? Don't think allopathically. It's dumb and will get you killed. Smart's better. Think homeopathically.

The last things you mentioned are about cognates. I've tried to explain these things, but it's very difficult for others to grasp that all homeopathics are cognates of all other drugs when fully examined because they all share many symptoms in common simply because many symptoms are common symptoms like headache, stomache, backache, etc. Cognate drugs is higher-level homeotherapeutics that never ends because the information is gigantic. What you quoted has nothing to do with your case. We match symptoms with greatest similarity, or with no ambiguity. It isn't at all easy to do that, though. The first thing necessary to do that is to know what all of the symptoms are, and it is difficult to elicit them in modern patients because they always want to tell us stuff like they're suffering from aluminum poisoning. Who cares? What are the symptoms you're attributing to aluminum poisoning? I spend hours trying to get people to tell me their symptoms. They often go, "I've already told you!" They almost invariably think that some named category is sufficient. You're all brainwashed, so fix it yourselves since only you can, but tell us your symptoms in the meantime. You have food complaints. What are they? Details, details, details, please.
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

Last edited by Hahnemannian444; 17th August 2008 at 08:44 PM. Reason: precision and Truth
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 16th August 2008, 10:27 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 62
myankle is on a distinguished road
Default

Albert

You can lock it up any way you like , you can pour out Hahnemanns theories etc

BUT I can eat absolutely anything I like so long as its not been stored or cooked in Aluminium ...............i know that without a shadow of a doubt
its not all in my mind or a figment of my imagination

I also know that if i drink water thats been treated with Alum i almost instantly become ill

My friends can tell you the same thing they have seen what happens to me from almost the moment i eat anything thats been cooked in Aluminium rather than stainless steel or glass

The people in Camelford know all too well the effects of Alum/alumiinium when a stupid tanker driver poured his tanker of Alum straight into the water supply ( do a google search and see just how many animals died and people are sick and have died and autopsys have shown they died from Alzheimer brains full of Aluminium salts /alum )

I am well aware of enzyme systems and the abject failure of Allopaths to get any grasp on illness ............for whatever reason you like to place on my situation i know what happens to me and why ...........the conundrum is finding a way to resolve it
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 16th August 2008, 10:57 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 62
myankle is on a distinguished road
Default

sudden bloodshot eyes
sudden griping stomach pain
rumbling in lower intestines
pricking/stinging in the rectum
cobweb over my face
waking to severe pain in my right ear plus a whooshing sensation
pain in every joint with sensation of insects boring their way out
extreme muscle pain
excrutiateing pain in thumbs ...starts in right and then goes to left
pricking sensation through left breast
sensation like a hole pouring out fluid in my brain above right eye
headache from someone pressing a bowl down on my brain from inside my skull
strange fuzzy feeling in my brain

creaky stiffness/spasm across my neck and shoulders
constipation and passing little bullets
sudden urge to stool
extremely loose motions
pains like 2 rods being pushed into my back around the area of the ovaries
ring of pain around top of pelvis
kidney stone type pains that move in line of the ureters
pain under right shoulder blade then under base of right rib cage
severe pain and grittyness in big toe joints
nausea and vomiting
severe loss of weight
grey palour
pressure at back of eyeballs feeling them being pushed out
suddenly feeling incredibly sleepy after a meal
inability to drop off to sleep
burping for hours being the only way to remove the problem

Many of the symptoms are/were ameliorated by heat of hot bath or hot water bottle or extreme exercise

When I was really ill 20+ years ago every single one of the above symptoms existed

.................................................. .................................................. ...

By getting rid of aluminium cookware etc and accepting the help of my then homeopath i recovered to the situation i face today where if i eat or drink something that has had the minutest contact with aluminium

commonest symptom is I cannot drop off to sleep and need to burp for hours or i wake at 3 or 4 pm and cant return to sleep

I might get fleeting pain through right thumb and then my left
I might get sudden griping stomach pain ......knot in solar plexus
I might get pricking stinging in the rectum
I might get tightness across neck and shoulders
I might wake to pain in my right ear
I might get rumbling sensation in lower bowell
I might be bad tempered and unreasonable
pain under right shoulder blade clearing to pain under right rib cage

All these latter symptoms will only occur if i am stupid enough to eat or drink something thats tainted/affected by Aluminium twice in a day or several days in succession

In other words the enzyme i need to deal with Aluminium is in very limited supply for whatever reason i simply do not know


If I totally avoid Aluminium in all its forms I have not one of the above symptoms and the minute my head hits the pillow i sleep very deeply for 7 hours
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 16th August 2008, 11:04 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 62
myankle is on a distinguished road
Default

add on

sensitive to loud noises
cannot tell what level my own voice is at
lump size of a pea that comes up and goes down/disappears just inside my right lower cheek
cant stand cigarette smoke ...........even someone smoking ahead of me in the street makes me nauseous
Fumes from gloss paints and varnish will trigger many of the original worst symptoms
yet methylated spirit /turpentine/nail varnish remover /acetone /dry cleaning fluid /glue do not bother me
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2008, 09:50 PM
Hahnemannian444's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 307
Hahnemannian444 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

First rubric entries for privately communicated uncommon symptom of the highest ranking here; i.e., the correct medicine has to be among this list:
Agn., alum., ambr., Bar-c., bell., berb., bor., camph., cann-s., carb-an., CAUST., ferr-p., Ferr., Graph., Helon., Hep., kali-i., Lyc., Mag-c., mur-ac., Nat-m., Ph-ac., phos., Rhod., Sep., sil., sulph.

(NOTE: The repertory entries don't copy to italics and bold type, so I've used the traditional method of capitalizing the first letter for italicized entries and capitalizing the entire abbreviation for bold-type entries. I'll get to that protocol in other rubrics once I've decided upon their hierarchical importance.)

An interesting symptom seemingly related to extreme sensitivity to aluminum cookware: Head pain [from abuse of] metallic substances, from abuse of [KENT0140]: Sulph.

Tobacco symptoms:
a.) Head pain, tobacco, smoking, from [KENT0145]: Acet-ac., acon., alum., ant-t., bell., brom., calad., calc., caust., clem., coc-c., cocc., ferr-i., ferr., gels., glon., ign., lob., mag-c., Nat-a., nat-m., nux-v., op., par., petr., plan., puls., sil., spig., thuj., zinc.
b.) Generalities, tobacco aggravates [KENT1405]: Acon., agar., alum., ambr., ant-c., arg-m., arg-n., Ars., bell., bry., calad., calc., camph., carb-an., carb-s., chel., chin., cic., clem., coc-c., coca., cocc., coloc., con., cycl., dig., euphr., ferr., gels., hell., hep., hydr., Ign., iod., ip., lach., lact-ac., lyc., mag-c., meny., nat-m., Nux-v., osm., par., petr., phos., Plan., Puls., ran-b., rhus-t., ruta., sabad., sabin., sars., sel., sep., sil., Spig., Spong., Staph., sul-ac., sulph., tarax., thuj., verat.
c.) e.) Head pain pressing, smoking, from [KENT0190]: Calad., mag-c.

You have a lot of sensations as if. Those are almost invariably guiding symptoms, so look them up in THE SYNTHETIC REPERTORY. Herbert A. Roberts' SENSATIONS AS IF is the correct reference work here, but I think Klunker and Barthel incorported them in THE SYNTHETIC REPERTORY. These are first, but my books were stolen, so find these and tell me which medicines are listed after them:

1. Waking to severe pain in my right ear plus a whooshing SENSATION;
a.) Ear, noises, rushing [KENT0300]: Abrot., agar., am-c., arn., ars., aster., aur., bar-c., bor., bov., brom., calc., caust., chel., chin-s., cinnb., cocc., coloc., con., dulc., euphr., gels., glon., graph., hep., hydr-ac., hyos., kali-ar., Kali-c., kali-cy., kali-n., kali-p., kali-s., lach., led., lil-t., Lyc., lyss., mag-c., mag-s., mang., merc., mez., mosch., nat-a., nat-c., Nat-m., nat-p., Nit-ac., nux-v., ox-ac., Petr., Phos., phyt., plat., puls., rhus-t., sel., sep., sil., spig., stann., staph., sul-ac., sulph., tab., ther., verat., viol-o.
Ear, noises, rushing [noises] in right : Nat-a.
[Several subrubrics passed over.]
Ear, noises, rushing [like] steam escaping, like : Glon., sil.
Ear, noises [as of] water, as of : Aster., Cham., cocc., kali-n., mag-c., mag-s., petr., puls.
----- That probably answers to "whooshing."
Ear, noises [like a] waterfall, like a : Ars., aster., aur., bry., cann-i., caust., chel., chin-s., con., lyss., mag-c., nat-p., petr., rhus-t., sul-ac., ther.
----- That also probably answers to "whooshing."
b.) Ear, noises, whizzing [KENT0300]: Agar., alum., am-c., arg-n., bell., berb., brom., calc., caust., chel., hep., hura., kali-c., kali-p., kali-s., lach., laur., led., Lyc., mag-c., mang., merc., mur-ac., naja., nat-c., nat-p., nicc., nit-ac., olnd., Petr., ph-ac., phos., plat., plb., rhus-t., sang., sep., sil., sul-ac., sulph., tab., tarent., thuj., zinc.
c.) Ear pain on waking [KENT0300]: Sep., tarent., tub.
d.) Ear pain right [KENT0300]: Aeth., am-m., ambr., arg-n., asaf., aur-m., bar-c., bar-m., Bell., berb., brom., bry., caust., chel., chin., colch., coloc., cupr., cycl., dros., elaps., eupi., Fl-ac., gels., hura., hyper., kali-c., kalm., lac-c., lach., lyc., mag-c., mag-m., merc-i-f., merc., mur-ac., nat-s., Nit-ac., nux-v., petr., prun-s., psor., puls., seneg., sep., stront., sulph., tab., tarent., tell., thuj., verb.

2. Pain in every joint with SENSATION of [AS IF] insects boring their way out;
a.) Extremeties, pain, boring [KENT1085]: Carb-v., coloc., mez., plan.
Extremeties, pain, boring, joints: Arg-m., clem., coloc., mang., rhod., thuj.
----- It's the closest match I've found so far, but it's suspect of being misrepresentive until the actual symptoms are searched out in the materia medica. The advantage of having Roberts' SENSATIONS AS IF is that he quotes the actual symptoms, and I know I've read that exact symptom somewhere.
b.) Generalities, pain, digging up (burrowing, rooting sensation) [KENT1375]: Acon., agar., alum., am-c., am-m., ambr., anac., ant-c., ant-t., arg-m., arg-n., arn., ars., asaf., asar., aur., bar-c., bar-m., bell., bism., bor., bov., bry., calc., cann-s., canth., caps., carb-an., carb-v., caust., cham., chel., chin., cina., clem., cocc., colch., coloc., con., croc., dig., dros., Dulc., eupho., ferr., graph., hell., hep., ign., kali-bi., kali-c., kali-n., kreos., laur., led., lyc., mag-c., mag-m., mang., merc., mez., mur-ac., nat-c., nat-m., nux-m., nux-v., olnd., petr., ph-ac., phos., plat., puls., rheum., Rhod., rhus-t., ruta., sabad., sabin., samb., seneg., sep., sil., Spig., spong., squil., stann., staph., stront., sul-ac., sulph., thuj., valer., zinc.

3. SENSATION like [AS IF] a hole pouring out fluid in my brain above right eye;
a.) Head, heaviness, forehead, all would come out, as if [KENT0125]: Acon., kreos., mag-s.
b.) Head, empty, hollow sensation, forehead, in [KENT0110]: Alum., Caust., croc., spig., sul-ac., sulph.
as if between forehead and brain : Caust.
----- Again, it's the closest match I've found so far, but it's suspect of being misrepresentive until the actual symptoms are searched out in the materia medica. The advantage of having Roberts' SENSATIONS AS IF is that he quotes the actual symptoms.
c.) Head, opening, sensation as if opened and let in cold air [KENT0130]: Cimic.
d.) Head, pain, brain, extending out through forehead [KENT0150]: Viol-t.

4. Headache from [SENSATION AS IF] someone pressing a bowl down on my brain from inside my skull:
a.) Head pain, pressing, cap, like a (See Armor) [KENT0185]: Apis., arg-n., asaf., berb., carb-v., coc-c., cocc., crot-c., cycl., graph., hell., ip., lil-t., peti., pyrog., stry., sulph., zinc.;

b.) Head pain, pressing downward [KENT0190]: Agar., ambr., ant-t., asar., cic., cina., cocc., con., cupr., hura., laur., mang., meny., merc-i-f., merc., mur-ac., nit-ac., nux-v., ph-ac., phos., plat., rhus-t., senn., sil., spig., spong., sulph., verat.

c.) Head pain, hat, pressure of : Calc-p., carb-v., Nit-ac., phys.
as from tight hat : Sulph.

d.) Head pain pressing outward [KENT0190]: Acon., agar., am-c., anac., arg-n., arn., ars., Asaf., asar., bell., berb., bry., camph., carb-ac., carb-an., chel., cimic., cob., coloc., con., cor-r., dros., dulc., eupho., ferr-ar., ferr-p., ferr., fl-ac., glon., hell., hep., hyper., ign., indg., kali-ar., kali-c., kreos., Lach., laur., lil-t., lyc., meny., merc., Nat-m., nux-m., olnd., par., ph-ac., phys., phyt., pic-ac., prun-s., psor., ptel., ran-s., rhod., sabad., sabin., samb., sep., sil., spig., spong., stann., staph., sulph., tarax., thuj., zinc.

contents would be forced out, as if : Lil-t.

e.) Head pain pressing, smoking, from [KENT0190]: Calad., mag-c.

f.) Head pain pressing, weight, as from [KENT0190]: Agar., alum., alumn., ars., bell., bism., cact., cann-s., carb-v., cina., cupr., laur., led., Meny., merc-i-r., mosch., nit-ac., nux-v., ph-ac., plat., rhus-t., sars., sil., spig., squil., sulph., thuj., verat.

g.) Head pain pressing, brain, as if bound up [KENT0190]: Acon., aeth., ambr., ant-t., arg-m., asar., Bry., calc., camph., carb-v., cham., cimic., cocc., colch., crot-c., cupr., cycl., gels., graph., guai., hyper., indg., Lac-c., lach., laur., mag-s., manc., meny., merc., morph., mosch., Nat-m., Nit-ac., olnd., op., par., petr., ph-ac., plat., prun-s., psor., puls., rhus-t., sars., sil., spig., staph.
cloth, by a : Cycl.
iron helmet, by an : Crot-c.
----- That one is interesting.
membranes were too tight : Acon., carb-v., op., par., psor.
----- That one is interesting.
skull too small, as if : Glon., morph., scut.
----- That one is interesting.
Head pain, pressing, brain, as if, forward : Acon., asar., bell., bry., ip., kali-c.
inward : Asar., cupr., glon.
on the : Ars., cann-i., glon., ign., manc., meny., ruta., sep.
----- That one is interesting.
outward : Agar., bell., bry., glon., guai., hep., hydr., indg., laur., lil-t., nat-m., phys., stann.
sharp corners, against, as if : Sabad.
skull against the, as if : Mez., rhod., rhus-v.
----- That one is interesting.
h.) Head pain, pressing, forehead, weight or stone, as if [KENT0190]: Acon., am-m., aur., bell., cham., dig., glon., kali-c., nat-m., par., rhus-t., sep., spig., tarax.
weight of hat : Carb-v.
i.) Head pain, pressing, occiput, weight or stone [as if] [KENT0195]: Anac., asar., bell., cann-s., carb-v., caust., chel., cina., cocc., cupr., graph., hell., kali-n., laur., led., meny., nux-v., Petr., ph-ac., plat., sulph.
j.) Head pain, pressing, vertex [KENT0195]: Acon., act-sp., aesc., agar., agn., all-c., aloe., alum., alumn., am-c., ambr., anac., ant-t., apis., arg-n., arn., ars., asaf., aur., bar-c., Bell., benz-ac., bov., brom., bry., bufo., Cact., calc-ar., calc-p., calc., camph., cann-s., canth., Carb-s., Carb-v., cast., caust., cedr., cham., chel., chen-a., chin-s., chin., cic., Cimic., cimx., cina., cinnb., clem., coc-c., cocc., colch., coloc., con., croc., crot-h., cupr., cycl., dig., dros., dulc., eug., eup-per., euphr., ferr-ar., ferr-i., ferr-p., ferr., fl-ac., gels., Glon., graph., hell., helon., hep., hipp., hydr-ac., hydr., hyos., hyper., ign., indg., iod., ip., jac-c., kali-bi., kali-c., kali-i., kali-n., kali-p., kalm., kreos., lac-c., Lach., laur., led., lil-t., lith., Lyc., lyss., mag-c., mag-m., manc., mang., med., meny., merc-i-r., mez., mosch., naja., nat-a., nat-c., nat-m., nat-p., nat-s., nicc., nit-ac., nux-m., nux-v., ol-an., olnd., op., ox-ac., pall., petr., Ph-ac., phel., phos., phys., phyt., pic-ac., plat., puls., ran-b., ran-s., rheum., rhod., rhus-t., rumx., sabad., sabin., sars., sep., Sil., spig., spong., squil., Stann., staph., stram., sul-ac., Sulph., syph., tab., thuj., valer., verat., verb., viol-t., xan., zinc.
[We pass over a lot of subrubrics.]
[We don't find pressing downward on vertex, which is just one reason it's preferred to use THE SYNTHETIC REPERTORY or Kunzli's REPERTORIUM GENERALE.]
[Look up these sensations as if, dear. Believe me, they are not going to be the same lists. Again, Roberts is the correct reference, but THE SYNTHETIC REPERTORY may have incorporated them.]

5. Strange fuzzy feeling [SENSATION AS IF] in my brain;
----- Rubric not yet found.

6. Pains like [SENSATION AS IF] 2 rods being pushed into my back around the area of the ovaries;
----- Rubric not yet found.
a.) Back, pain, pressing, sacral region [KENT0930]: Acon., agar., all-c., aloe., ang., arg-m., berb., bor., cann-s., Carb-an., carb-v., caust., chel., ferr., ign., lyss., meny., mosch., Nux-v., puls., ruta., sabin., samb., sec., sep., spong., tarax., verat., zinc.
evening : Puls.
night : Ang.
dull instrument, as from a : Mosch.
----- Single entries are always very interesting because uncommon symptoms will usually be small precisely because they're strange, rare and peculiar, but you have to be cautious about them because the repertory is always under expansion, and Kent essentially created the first usable repertory. Still, Moschus has shown up a lot here. Ultimately, this is rather pointless without precise fits of the sensations as if because I've read many of these and therefore know they exist. Look them up.

7. Pressure at back of eyeballs [SENSATION AS IF] feeling them being pushed out;
a.) Eye, pain, pressing outward [KENT0255]: Agar., asaf., asar., bell., berb., bry., camph., cann-s., caul., cham., cimic., crot-c., daph., eupi., fago., fl-ac., glon., guai., guare., ham., ign., ip., lac-c., lach., Led., lycps., merc-c., merc., merl., nat-s., Nux-v., op., par., ph-ac., phos., phyt., psor., puls., sang., seneg., sil., Spig., thuj.
when pressing throat : Lach.

8.

Then, look up these symptoms and tell me which medicines are listed for them:
1. Constipation and passing little bullets; find little bullets;
a.) ----- Rubric not yet found.
b.) Stool, balls, like (See Sheep Dung) [KENT0635]: Aesc., Alum., Alumn., brach., calc-p., calc., cob., cop., euphr., form., hipp., hydr., Mag-m., med., Merc., mez., Nat-m., Nit-ac., nux-v., Op., phos., Plb., psor., ptel., Sulph., thuj., verat., vib.
black : Alumn., Op., plat., Plb., pyrog., verat.
brown : Nux-v.
light colored : Coll.
c.) Stools, sheep dung, like (See Balls) [KENT0640]: Alum., Alumn., am-m., anth., bapt., bar-c., berb., bor., brom., carb-an., carb-s., caust., Chel., chin-s., cob., coll., cop., graph., hydr., kali-c., kali-n., kali-s., lach., Mag-m., Merc., nat-c., Nat-m., nat-s., Nit-ac., nux-v., Op., plat., Plb., ruta., sep., spig., stront., sul-ac., Sulph., tab., verat., verb.
d.) Stool, lumps, like chalk (See White) [KENT0635]: Bell., Calc., dig., hep., lach., Podo., Sanic., spong.

Next, look up these symptoms in Gregg's AN ILLUSTRATED REPERTORY:
1. Ring of pain around top of pelvis;
2. Pain under right shoulder blade then under base of right rib cage;
3. Kidney-stone-type pains that move in line of the ureters [in line of the what?]

What does this mean:
1. Severe pain and grittyness [what does that mean?] in big toe joints;
2.

Interesting symptoms easily repertorized:
1. Suddenly feeling incredibly sleepy after a meal:
Sleepiness, eating, after [KENT1250]: Acon., Agar., all-s., aloe., am-c., anac., ant-c., apis., arum-m., arum-t., bov., bry., bufo., calc-p., Calc., canth., caps., carb-s., carb-v., carl., chel., chin., cic., cinnb., clem., coc-c., croc., cycl., dig., gamb., graph., grat., hyos., kali-c., kali-p., kali-s., lach., lyc., lyss., meph., mur-ac., nat-m., nit-ac., Nux-v., op., petr., ph-ac., phos., rhus-t., rumx., ruta., sil., staph., sulph., tarax., tell., thuj., verb., vib., zinc.

2. Burping for hours being the only way to remove the problem:
a.) Stomach, eructations ameliorate [KENT0490]: Acet-ac., acon., aesc., agar., all-c., aloe., alum., am-m., ambr., Ant-t., Arg-n., aur., bar-c., bar-i., berb., bry., cann-s., canth., Carb-s., Carb-v., chel., coc-c., cocc., colch., coloc., cop., dig., dios., fl-ac., Graph., hydr., Ign., iod., Kali-bi., Kali-c., kali-i., kali-s., lach., lact-ac., Lyc., mag-c., mag-m., mosch., nat-c., nat-m., nit-ac., nux-v., op., par., petr., ph-ac., phos., pic-ac., plat., rumx., Sang., seneg., sep., sil., sul-ac., sulph., tarent., ter., zinc.
b.) Stomach, retching, eating, after, amel. []KENT0525: Ign., nat-c.

3. Many of the symptoms are/were ameliorated by heat of hot bath or hot water bottle or extreme exercise
Generalities, amelioration from heat []:
Generalities, exertion, physical, amel. [KENT1355]: Canth., ign., nat-m., plb., Rhus-t., Sep., sil., stann., tril.
Generalities, warm bed amel. [KENT1410]: Agar., am-c., arn., Ars., aur., bar-c., bell., Bry., calc-p., camph., canth., caust., cic., cocc., coloc., con., dulc., graph., Hep., hyos., kali-bi., Kali-c., kali-i., kali-p., lach., Lyc., mag-p., mosch., nit-ac., Nux-m., Nux-v., petr., ph-ac., phos., Rhus-t., rumx., sabad., sep., Sil., spong., squil., stann., staph., stram., stront., sulph., tarent., Tub.


Questions:

You wake at 3 or 4pm? PM?
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 17th August 2008, 09:59 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 62
myankle is on a distinguished road
Default

strangely i do not need to look up many of the list of symptoms in a repertory ..............they come out with the same thing but you wont believe the answer


if affected by food eaten around 6pm tainted by alumnium
I cannot drop off to sleep and about 2 am i will start to burp and burp and burp


If the tainted food was consumed at lunchtime then i am likely to
to wake up at 3 or 4 am and will be unable get back to sleep
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 18th August 2008, 07:32 AM
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UK
Posts: 62
myankle is on a distinguished road
Default

I do not have either of the books you quote
I am not an experienced Homeopath able to understand the nuiances of repertories

As for grittiness in big toes ;_

They WERE painful and felt like there was sand or grit in the joint
they are fine these days
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 18th August 2008, 07:57 PM
Hahnemannian444's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 307
Hahnemannian444 is an unknown quantity at this point
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by myankle View Post
strangely i do not need to look up many of the list of symptoms in a repertory ..............they come out with the same thing but you wont believe the answer
No, they won't. A handful of drugs will run through a set of symptoms, and then you look up those actual symptoms in the materia medica. What you mean, "They come out with the same thing?"

Sensations as if are important symptoms. Look them up.
__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any views/experience of Ramkrishnan method for Cancer treatment out there? Rosina Homeopathy Discussion 0 4th June 2008 10:07 AM
Constitution and Concomitants / How valid are David Little’s views? Hans Weitbrecht Homeopathy Discussion 10 18th December 2006 10:31 PM
Hahnemann's Views on Vaccination drsunshine Homeopathy List Discussion 2 23rd May 2006 01:35 PM
Divergent views gavinimurthy Homeopathy Discussion 9 25th June 2005 07:25 PM
Views of Ambassdor of European Union Vet Dr. Hafiz Mati Coffee Shop 13 10th November 2004 03:34 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:20 PM.



The information contained on OtherHealth.com arises by way of discussion between contributors and should not be treated as a substitute for the advice provided by your own personal physician or other health care professional. None of the contributions on this site are an endorsement by the site owners of any particular product, or a recommendation as to how to treat any particular disease or health-related condition. If you suspect you have a disease or health-related condition of any kind, you should contact your own health care professional immediately. Please read the BB Rules for further details.
Please consult personally with your own health care professional before starting any diet, exercise, supplementation or medication program.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0
Copyright © 2008 otherhealth.com