otherhealth.com  

Go Back   otherhealth.com > Homeopathy > Homeopathy Discussion
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 14th March 2008, 05:37 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 15
thekind78 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dani View Post
Diarrhea isn't necessarily a bad thing; it's a natural way for the body to rid itself of undesirable things. But, of course, if it goes on too long it can be very serious due to the fluid loss and non-absorption of vitamins and minerals. How long did the diarrhea go on? How long did you wait after taking the coffea and the ignatia? A 30c should have been an acceptable potency.

I assume you aren't seeing a professional homeopath? The best thing would be for a professional to take your entire case and prescribe based on those symptoms, as best they can be discerned apart from what you think are the nux proving symptoms. I assume you took nux for some problems usually associated with it, which means, you might have originally needed a remedy that is similar to it. If that remedy is given, it would probably resolve the nux issues. From your description I understand why op. was suggested, and it could possibly be the originally correct remedy (do you tend to get sleepy when you cease activity, and sit down in a chair?), but it's very difficult to tell without taking the entire case.

I don't know how severe your proving symptoms are, but from one of your earlier posts it sounded like you only get them every 3 weeks or so. If that's tolerable, I would say again that it might be better to wait it out than to add more remedies to the mix. But if you find them intolerable, you have my blessing to give Op 30c a whirl. Incidentally, for me, a 30c will last about 6 weeks, a 6c for about 4 days in non-acutes. With a 200c I'm looking at 4-6 months, but I am admittedly outrageously sensitive!

Dani
Dani,
Around Nov 2006 I took a 1M dose of Nux. I had fantastic results for my IBS symptoms. To be honest, I haven't felt better in years. About 6 months later, I took another dose - for what seemed like chest congestion and stuffy feeling after meals. That was a mistake. It caused havoc and the old symptoms reappeared along with some new ones - i.e. angina, sleeplessness. I've been trying to rid myself of these symptoms ever since. What gets me is that once Nux worked wonders. Now, it seems to do nothing but harm. I'm looking at homeopaths locally. I want to be sure they are 'classical'. I'm awfully sensitive too, and don't think I could handle polypharmacy and mega doses etc. Thanks for your suggestions.
Reply With Quote
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 14th March 2008, 07:16 PM
Gina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 979
Gina is on a distinguished road
Default

Dear 78, You posted:"Around Nov 2006 I took a 1M dose of Nux. I had fantastic results for my IBS symptoms. To be honest, I haven't felt better in years. About 6 months later, I took another dose - for what seemed like chest congestion and stuffy feeling after meals. That was a mistake".......................................... ...............................................

Here is your answer:

Vide the aphorism 242 of the 4th Organon.
"As long, therefore, as the progressive improvement continues from the medicine administered, so long we can take for granted that the duration of the action of the helpful medicine, in this case at least, continues, and hence all repetition of any dose of medicine is forbidden [DL]. "
The same point is also stressed in Aphorism 245.
"Even one dose of the same medicine which has up to now proved beneficial, if repeated before the improvement has begun to stand still in every direction, [DL] will, like an untimely interference, only aggravate the state..."
Hahnemann again reminds us at the end of this paragraph:
"In one word, we disturb the amelioration affected, and still to be expected from the first dose, if we give a second dose of the same originally well chosen remedy before the expiry of the period of action of the first; at all events, we thereby delay the recovery [DL]. "
The Single Dose Wait and Watch Method
These aphorisms introduce the "wait and watch" philosophy which is a manifestation of the principle of minimal intervention, another important aspect of the maxim of the minimal dose. If the sufferer is improving after the administration of the first dose of a remedy, all repetitions of the dose are completely counter indicated. It is only when there is a clear relapse of the symptoms that a second dose of a remedy may be administered. This injunction was introduced to prevent disruption of the healing process by the premature repetition of the remedy.
Hahnemann noticed that premature repetition of a dose often caused a relapse of symptoms as well as accessory symptoms (side-actions) of the remedy to appear. This mixture of natural and remedial symptoms confuses the picture and slows down the cure. This is why classical homoeopaths are very conservative about the repetition of the remedy before there is a definite relapse of the symptoms. This demands great patience because even during a slow amelioration the sufferer must wait for a relapse of symptoms before they may take another dose.
__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 14th March 2008, 07:20 PM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 15
thekind78 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina View Post
Vide the aphorism 242 of the 4th Organon.
"As long, therefore, as the progressive improvement continues from the medicine administered, so long we can take for granted that the duration of the action of the helpful medicine, in this case at least, continues, and hence all repetition of any dose of medicine is forbidden [DL]. "
The same point is also stressed in Aphorism 245.
"Even one dose of the same medicine which has up to now proved beneficial, if repeated before the improvement has begun to stand still in every direction, [DL] will, like an untimely interference, only aggravate the state..."
Hahnemann again reminds us at the end of this paragraph:
"In one word, we disturb the amelioration affected, and still to be expected from the first dose, if we give a second dose of the same originally well chosen remedy before the expiry of the period of action of the first; at all events, we thereby delay the recovery [DL]. "
The Single Dose Wait and Watch Method
These aphorisms introduce the "wait and watch" philosophy which is a manifestation of the principle of minimal intervention, another important aspect of the maxim of the minimal dose. If the sufferer is improving after the administration of the first dose of a remedy, all repetitions of the dose are completely counter indicated. It is only when there is a clear relapse of the symptoms that a second dose of a remedy may be administered. This injunction was introduced to prevent disruption of the healing process by the premature repetition of the remedy.
Hahnemann noticed that premature repetition of a dose often caused a relapse of symptoms as well as accessory symptoms (side-actions) of the remedy to appear. This mixture of natural and remedial symptoms confuses the picture and slows down the cure. This is why classical homoeopaths are very conservative about the repetition of the remedy before there is a definite relapse of the symptoms. This demands great patience because even during a slow amelioration the sufferer must wait for a relapse of symptoms before they may take another dose.
Gina,
Wow, this is why half knowledge is dangerous! It's quite the shame too as I had never felt better in years. I'm hoping I can regain that good health. Is it too late for Nux? Will it require another medicine? In your opinion of course, I know nothing substitutes for in person consultation. Thanks very much.
Reply With Quote
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 15th March 2008, 10:26 PM
Gina's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 979
Gina is on a distinguished road
Default

Dear 78
Its best to depart the self prescribing and make an appt. with a trained homeopath.

Its funny how skeptics come on these homeopathic websites saying "HOMEOPATHY is placebo,there is nothing in it".....................If nothing is in the homeopathic remedy how can it cause so much trouble when prescribed wrongly?

Suppression via the wrong homeopathic remedy is verry complex to untangle.
__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein
Reply With Quote
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 16th March 2008, 04:22 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: DFW
Posts: 15
thekind78 is on a distinguished road
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gina View Post
Dear 78
Its best to depart the self prescribing and make an appt. with a trained homeopath.

Its funny how skeptics come on these homeopathic websites saying "HOMEOPATHY is placebo,there is nothing in it".....................If nothing is in the homeopathic remedy how can it cause so much trouble when prescribed wrongly?

Suppression via the wrong homeopathic remedy is verry complex to untangle.
Gina,
Yes, I agree. Time to go to see someone qualified. Thanks for your help! And btw, at least in my case, if it only were a placebo!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A proving, then what? MRC_Hans Coffee Shop 117 11th March 2008 02:14 AM
New proving Wendy Howard Homeopathy List Discussion 1 1st March 2008 12:51 PM
Proving Dearing Fauntleroy Homeopathy List Discussion 1 17th April 2006 02:39 PM
proving habeeba Homeopathy Discussion 17 16th August 2005 12:26 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:41 PM.



The information contained on OtherHealth.com arises by way of discussion between contributors and should not be treated as a substitute for the advice provided by your own personal physician or other health care professional. None of the contributions on this site are an endorsement by the site owners of any particular product, or a recommendation as to how to treat any particular disease or health-related condition. If you suspect you have a disease or health-related condition of any kind, you should contact your own health care professional immediately. Please read the BB Rules for further details.
Please consult personally with your own health care professional before starting any diet, exercise, supplementation or medication program.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.1.0
Copyright © 2008 otherhealth.com