----------

I haven't attended his seminars but read a lot of his work.

Yes he does follow Lippe and repeatedly has spoken against LMs, this I think owes to the differences in personalities that we all have. Some of us are attracted to things others are not.

Imo, since he has seen the success of Lippe without LMs, so it has convinced him not to use them.

__________________
Don't take life too seriously, it aint permanent.

Attending a live conference with Andre is a great experience. His DVD course is also very good. The detail, the quality of the teaching, the quality of the material is really exceptional. He may be homeopathy's best modern day prescriber.

He is a strict Hahnemannian -- but at the same time, he feels that science has moved beyond a few things that Hahnemann held to be true -- like miasms. Andre teaches the remedy for any case is that remedy which matches the genius of the case (the rare, strange, peculiar symptoms of the case) -- regardless of other factors. This idea is also what Hahnemann taught and the great masters like Lippe, Hering, Nash, Wells, Pulford, Dunham, Geurnsey and other practiced and taught. As for LM's -- Andre may be our best historian. What he has found by looking at Hahnemann's case books is that Hahnemann did not have a tremendous amount of experience with the LMs. He was still experimenting with them at the end of his life. Andre prefers the C scale as he has great success with that scale.

Anyone who can attend Saine's summer conference (June) should do so. He is an extraordinary teacher -- and will help you become a much better prescriber. Go if you can.