Hello Everyone,

What are your comments? With or Without experience.

"Haemorrhoids

Constitutional prescribing is usually difficult owing to the large choice of potential remedies However, the use of combined remedies has been successful in the majority of cases, even more so when combined with diet, which in some cases is essential. From Dr. Tyler I learned the value of a routine course of Nux Vomica 3x before breakfast and Sulphur 3x on retiring, for a month. This was often completely successful, and the course could be repeated if there was a recurrence. Cases responding partially were dealt with by a further month of Nux Vomica and Sulphur on alternate days, and so on. "

Dr. Dhiman Roy

This is the stupidity of writer to advice in this manner. I have also read many times this type of prescription. Patient can be recovered by this technique but this is not real homeopathy because it involves risk factor whether the patient will recover or not. Suppose if the patient does not respond against such type of prescription then who will be responsible when we can easily handle piles / Haemorrhoids cases very easily. Who will be responsible of wasting one month. Who will be responsible if the medicines start proving in the patient?

__________________
Moalij
is your close friend.

The prescription of this sort, sometimes do work, but they will merely palliate.

A few cases may get cured,by chance,if they have the susceptiblity either to Nux or Sulphur.

The complimentary nature of these two remedies,may also, prevent any untoward manifestations in the patient.The very low potencies may not do much harm.

But, it is always better to take little more time and look for an appropriate medicine.

Murthy

Thanks to all thoese you have replied. But please considered that the writer is Donald McD. Foubiste and he is quoting from Dr. Tyler, and also the writer says that when the constitutional medicine faild to cure

Dhiman Roy

WOW this also reveals the standard of homeopathic education both have

That is why Dr. MAS always say, we should see what is written and don't see who is the writer? Everything written in the book is not correct. He always talk to "users" (aliases) and the operator behind the user. In this regard Gavin Answer is very much appealing. Although he is not a homeopath (he claims) but he knows much about homeopathy rather better then us. Kind of him appearing at otherhealth forum.

__________________
Homeopath