A Homeopathic View of Tissue Breakdown [ & neurology] .
Bovine Spongiform Encephalitis [ BSE ] Creuzfeldt-Jakob Disease [CJD] and Alzheimer’s are variations of a common phenomena. They share a tendency for the brain tissue to breakdown and lose its cohesion. They are all in effect disorganized tissue where the cells cannot carry messages along established neurological paths.
The reason is that individual cells are no longer in the communication loop of the genetic material and following their genetic imperative [ APOPTOSIS] , commit suicide .
Thus the empty spaces which are common to BSE, CJD. and Alzheimer’s ARE ALL DUE A BREAKDOWN OF TISSUE FOLLOWING A BREAKDOWN OF COMMUNICATION BETWEEN THE GENETIC MATERIAL IN THE CELLS . – NOT neurological breakdown
The trouble is that medical science perceives [incorrectly] that the breakdown in communication arises from progressive deterioration of neurons ,a physical phenomena. Whereas the origin of the problem is the breakdown in the communication of the total body system. In the vitality/energy level/spirit which allows each individual cell to know [ geographically] it’s location in the entire organism. Also what it’s function is in relation to that location.
This is achieved by the existence of a non physical envelope , only normally divorced from its fleshy habitation on death. Points to confirm this;- one is the perceptual experience of a “phantom” limb. The owner of the “ex limb” feels that is still where it always was, even feels pain in it. Another is the numerous “out of body” experiences, considered by science to be subjective or delusional. These are the actual temporary divorce of ‘vitality’ from its fleshy habitation.
This ‘vital’ envelope is how individual cells maintain contact with each other regardless of the distance between them, AND IS CREATED BY THE GENETIC MATERIAL, in order to communicate.
Kaltenbach [1953 Jnl Exp Zool] carried out work quoted in “ Hormones & Evolution “ E. U .P Lond . 1964 . “ --- another illustration , is the formation of the Opercular Window , in Tadpoles ,for the fore legs to emerge . Thyroxine causes a thickening of most of the epidermis, for terrestrial life – but where the forelegs are to emerge it causes a THINNING “. Identical cells respond in opposite ways, to the thyroxine . “ The hormone evokes the response – the cell defines what that response shall be. “
Unfortunately medical science puts the cart before the horse, assuming that the only possible form of communication in the body is neurological, which is nonsense. A statement backed up by the work of the Director of Neurosciences, J.M.Delgado , at the University of Sevilla . Who is quoted in El Pais , 22/9/2004 “ Much of the investigation into the brain is not science , but literature [ fiction?] . Prof Delgado states that “ the brain is complicated, because there are distinct types of neurons , about whose function we have no idea . For only 3 or 4 neurons can we explain the function. Of the rest we will say that they coordinate, regulate, integrate. It is not physiology, it is not science. .... There are scientists who consider it to be a property of the nervous circuit of the cerebral cortex, but these are vague words. The thing about the cortex is that, since we do not know how it works, each one can assign to it the function that he likes. The experiments are complicated but the mechanism is simple. “ I do not understand why they try to isolate each and every one of the actions and emotions. The other day I read that they have found the nucleus of frustration. I doubt that it exists. Yes there are injuries in a specific zone that affect specific activities, but these are not the normal thing. It means that in this zone there are a few neurons that do something the others cannot do. We must know its activity, which neurons do not function. There are movements a rabbit cannot do , that are easy for a fish. With a smaller brain, it can do it. Size does not matter .
We study the eye which is easier to study than others. The eye, has remained the same for 500 million years It is a very primitive and perfect system. In a study published in Journal of Neuroscience, they described the neuronal system that allows the eye to fix in an orbit to see an object. We have described a system activated when it is necessary to direct the eye to a stimulus. In this moment a signal of acetylcholine, fires the neurotransmitter regulating the whole process across the receptor type M1. The first time it is explained in a realistic form, how neurons fix the position of the eye towards a visual stimulus.
To see an object, it has to be fixed on the retina and there are two ways to do that : either the eye is fixed on the object, or the eye and the object move at the same speed. " During the movement of the eye one does not see anything one can appreciate ". This the way primates see.
We isolated all three types of neuron and stimulated them electrically, as if there was a visual stimulus. We saw it produced a cascade activating the motorneurons to the eye.
There were mathematical models for the speed of movement of the eye, but neurons are not expert on integrals. As the eye moves one see’s nothing though one does not realize it. To see while moving, the entire world must move to the same speed. During the 100 milliseconds of the movement of the eye, the brain avoids an image of what one saw.
All of this describes material, physiological, electrochemical reactions, but without the inclusion of the ‘vital ‘ envelope and its ability to communicate – is, as Prof Delgado points out, literature or fiction.