For a Synopsis of Nine Ways to Administer the Nosodes please see website:

http://www.simillimum.com/Thelittlel.../9nosodes.html

Hi wim, The article says

There is no body to object on the remarks of writer. I am happy the writer said bodly what he observed I am also happy the most visited site allowed this article to be displayed for the public with the above mentioned remarks.

I am the only person who has been lurking for the last 4 years that don't blindly follow what is written in the books. Start from the books which is written but follow what you observed. Each doctor has its own observation but books and rules contradict with them.

Believe me, I have said all these things in the past on different forums and I encountered hundred of [edit: offensive expletive] remarks.

Now I say, we prescribe miasmatic medicine without taking full case of the patient. For our miasmatic medicine, it is also not necessary that it should cover entire symptoms of the patient. If it is so then similia principle is wrong.

__________________
Hafeez
Forum Pk

Dear Dr. Mas, Thank you very much for your reply ! I don`t follow blindly the books either. Students/colleagues should constantly realise that repertorisation doesn`t always immediately lead to the right remedy, partly or maybe even mainly due to the different interpretations (degree of importance) of the symptoms. It is even more difficult to convince a layman on a forum or elsewhere that some homeopaths needn`t always take the case in full to find the correct remedy.I simply ignore the bull**** remarks and hope that these laymen will read more and better books to reach the understanding that sometimes 1 or 2 distinct indications are sufficient to prescribe on. Last year a mother(student of class.homeopathy) came to me with her 9 yr. old boy with nasty eczema spots on his belly. The boy had a fair skin and fair hair, was restless,ate quite a lot,liked travelling by car/train. This made me think of Tuberculinum Koch or Bovinum. However this boy had NO fear of dogs/cats and had NO aversion to meat, eggs, milk etc. Yet I decided (after less than 10 minutes)to prescribe the nosode Tub. bov.30C (30K) for a few days till amel.(improvement) Within a fortnight the eczema had completely vanished and his mother was flabbergasted! Another example is Sharon, 4 yrs. old. Very bad case of eczema on arms, legs, face etc. The case was solved in less than 5 minutes! I saw that her sclera were blue/bluish and asked the mother if the child was easily offended by admonition and if she was obstinate, which the mother confirmed readily. There was no obvious history in the family pointing to Carcinosin. Yet I prescribed this remedy(nosode) and within a month the child was clean and not a single trace of the eczema was to be seen.For the remaining slight itch I prescribed coconut oil as an emollient. Unfortunately each case is not always that easy to solve but together with Dr. Mas I would like to point out that a case not always need to be taken in full, depending on the skills, experience,feeling and insight(perception) etc. of the prescriber, especially so when it comes to miasmatic prescribing using the nosodes which have already been prescribed for many years ! Kind regards, Wim Pardaan (homeopath)

Oh Waooo! you are quite intelligent.

But who will teach this rule to so called classical homeopaths. They will not agree with you.

To them for prescribing Tub, there must be T.B history in the patient or in his family otherwise Tub is not the remedy. I disagree to the statement made by so many book writers. There only source of income is from book writing, because they are very good writer but not very good observant and practitioner.

__________________
Hafeez
Forum Pk

And yet I believe that class.homeopaths will gradually acquire a broader view. I notice that when reading and studying many books on homeopathy.
Dr. Noel Pratt(MRCS,LRCP,FFHom) for instance, says in his book Homoeopathic Prescribing, page viii :
There are times when full repertorisation is necessary, but there are other times when personal experience enables a simpler way of selecting the similimum etc.
Robin Logan(FSHom) says in his book The homoeopathic Treatment of Eczema, page 102 :
Do not be put off if you strongly suspect Carcinosin but there is no obvious history in the family- it has to start somewhere !
Dr. Rajan Sankaran teaches us in his book The Spirit of Homoeopathy that one single symptom, representing a characteristic combination, can lead us to the correct remedy.
E.g. Kalium carbonicum has the single (unique) symptom mentioned in Kent`s Repertory, page 12, Company,desires, but treats them outrageously. No other remedy is mentioned there!
These are only a few examples to show that repertorisation in full is not always obligatory. More examples are to be found in several other books !

Btw, Does the remedy selection on one or just few symptoms is better & shows strongness of homeopathy OR on all symptoms by full case taking shows accordingly?

__________________
Homeopathic & Biochemic system existed because Drs.Hahnemann & Schuessler thought differently.
Successful people don't do different things, they do things differently..S.Kh.

It is not necessarily better, but it is another possibility sometimes which takes much less time

Will it be justified if we base & advocate this theory, obiously if we accept & endorse "totality of symptoms"? If part cure is justified?

__________________
Homeopathic & Biochemic system existed because Drs.Hahnemann & Schuessler thought differently.
Successful people don't do different things, they do things differently..S.Kh.

Yeh, and I bet the person who said this had a very good knowledge of Materia Medica. Repertorisation is only a tool. Knowing your remedies is another.
You can't use guesswork and expect to get consistent results.

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

In what sense? If you've got Sankaran's extensive background and clinical experience (as well as cultural experience), then, yes, you can use this and your materia medica knowledge and your assessment of the totality of the case and save a step in repertorization. But it took Sankaran decades of study and practice to be able to get to this point; it takes all homeopaths decades of hard work to be able to once in a while skip repertorization and realize the need for a remedy in their patients just by clinical experience and familiarity. Why is this so hard to understand?

This is not a situation where you have people who are barely schooled in the basics taking massive shortcuts and getting curative, consistent results. It's a situation where the extensively experienced are using ALL their skills and tools to make a decision regarding a remedy. That's all.

__________________
...and deliverance has many faces<br />but grace<br />is an aquaintance of mine