John Stanton said:

I wonder what our visiting/quasi-resident skeptics think of that and how they'd quantify such qualitative reactions so pivotally important in homeopathic case analysis.

[ 21. October 2003, 05:12: Message edited by: Hahnemannian444 ]

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

Doctorleela said:
I quoted Hahnemann, didn't I?

Who else is a better judge of what constitutes Hahnemannian practice?

I like the GVs, but you guys are inevitably headed for an upward adjustment in your practices and advice, for you cannot make your adulterations and corruptions of Hahnemannian homeopathy fit into it nor hide from the admonitions by Hahnemannians over the centuries, can you?

This situation in the world has never existed before; there have never been so many HPHs.

In about 20 years, assuming everything goes according to the historically recurrent progression of HPHs advancing to Hahnemannian homeopathy, we should be much more ready for the inevitable quantum leap in physics when the blokes finally admit that they've been admitting to the existence of the AEther and thus to the ultramolecular drugs with which we've been demonstrating cures of allopathically incurable diseases from the beginning.

Mostly this is expected, however, because it seems to me that the present generation is so much more emotionally mature and well informed than any previous one that they simply won't any longer stand for abject quackery or the bankrupting of economies by the quacks.

There is a major socio-economic revolution soon headed and in short order, so we better be ready for the demand.

[ 21. October 2003, 05:13: Message edited by: Hahnemannian444 ]

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

Albert, quoting Hahnemann means nothing and it does not take much to do that.

I do not need to be branded or categorized as any particular group to define myself (by you or anybody else).
I'll be who I was created to be, by God.
So please don't worry too much about me or even Homeopathy for that matter, we'll survive anyway.

In the meanwhile if you've got something CONSTRUCTIVE to add to the homeopathic community, I think you should concentrate on that.

All the best!
doctorleela

__________________
http://www.homeopathy2health.com

Defending homeopathy from adulteration is not constructive?

Our old literature is full of such admonitions by Hahnemannians against low-potency pseudo-homeopaths.

And I feel the above was and my general nature is wholly constructive and helpful.

Am sorry you find otherwise, but I will remember it.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

Hello,

If I can pull all these thoughts into one point (at this moment), then I see that the art of case taking is an aspect I MUST painstaningly exercise.

Hahn444 , you make very good points (hold strong). What I learn from you is...upon knowing something as true stand by it and sway not from this foundation.

ChrisG, Thank you.

Kayveeh, You are tough but not rude. You are a good student. Just need the right teacher(s).Keep questioning . From you I learn persistance is important.

. Dr leela, I can tell that you hold empath qualities (good, very good). you have the makings a good teacher. And from you Dr llela I see patience is a virtue.

Thank you

John