![]() |
|
|||
|
With regard to the difficulty of obtaining of patiently information about his mental picture, I understand what you say, but I do not believe that it is indispensable for the practice any more unicista. Some pluricistas are authentic specialists in the symptom, so much, that often they give a constitutional simillimum (without knowing it), being based on physical symptoms, organic symptoms that we probably despise to medicate. Precisely because the man is one quite, and each of his symptoms is the representation of this quite, the form in which they make the eyes ill of physostigma, is only of physostigma, and the pains of bryonia are only of bryonia ... I want to say that actually the important thing is that we medicate consciously to bryonia, to everything he, and not only his pains, though they are his pains those that have opened us the door of his comprehension. Not if he will understand me. You know how a bill of mail works in Internet. One enters the web page of the bill and they ask us for a key and a name. We introduce our name, then we introduce the key and .... ¡voilá! we enter in ours bill of mail. Well then, this is an example, some of them believe that when they enter the page of the bill of mail, already they have treated the patient, others even introduce the name and believe that already it is, and still there are others that enter the page, they introduce the name and introduce an erroneous key, then they look for another side and do not want to see his patient who says to them: incorrect key, it introduces again his key... Well, until they do not give themselves all the steps, our bill of mail is not going to work, and until not him we give the simillimum, the patient is not going to treat. The important thing is not now how we are going to obtain our information but we know to where we have to come. I would like much, if it did not have the limitations that I have with the language, which we were beginning debate on the concept of disease and the concept of health. The disease as a condition of chaos, and the remedy as a stimulus that in the same sense that the disease leads this chaos to a critical point after which, it begins a new order. It is possible that more than one remedy, depending on his similarity with the sick being, is capable of pushing towards the critical point of chaos, and from there, pushing towards the way of the treatment, but it is like with an energetic connection that the organism is going to react. Giving remedies in succession, one after other one, in zigzag or since it is, also it is possible to to come, surely, I would not dare to reject any option in homeopathy, I believe sincerely that none we have the exact key of the way of coming and until we have her, any type of boarding looks like to me a good help. The health of the patients is the only true, they are who say to us if the remedy was good, bad or regular, there is neither another truth nor another sense for our work. An embrace. |
|
|||
|
HI Dr. T,
NO bruised ego's at all! But then David suggested the same remedy - I thought a very good choice on more physical information. Thanks for furthur insight into the remedy and your rationale into its choice. IF the ermedy helped, its a very good one, especially when the patient has had such deep problems like Kocks and a possibility of HIV. I thought I missed something there with not giving the burning (in the chest) more importance especially in the chest - that's why I was wondering whether you meant "fever" or burning sensation in generals because I thought that was a very important rubric. And yes you're right, the possibility of Ars or Sulph salt was to include the burning...! I couldn't be sure if she was chilly or hot. YEs the Sulph also because of the fear of falling, it came up very high on the repping. HEre's where I delve more into the mentals and decide on the salt, if required. The Calcarea choice - on a superficial level was for the "afraid of falling", besides of course that it covers all the modalities. Calc is also a very good tubercular remedy and we often prescribe it here in Kocks patients - glandular as well as pulmonary Kocks with haemoptysis. I don't know if I've explained myself and my rationale well, as I'm a little bit in a hurry with a lot of computer problems here. IT was "fun", so when you get a little time do get on board. By the way - did you get access into the professional forum? We thought you may take a dekko there. All the best! doctorleela [ 02. October 2003, 14:27: Message edited by: doctorleela ]
__________________
http://www.homeopathy2health.com |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| we were curing cancer a century ago !! | passkey | Homeopathy Discussion | 26 | 12th January 2009 07:42 AM |
| cancer-latency-history -cure | passkey | Homeopathy Discussion | 5 | 23rd November 2004 07:17 PM |
| Can anyone recommend a computer repertory? | Kara | Homeopathy Discussion | 6 | 24th August 2004 06:00 PM |
| ICY COLDNESS OF HEAD | HDRTARIQ | Homeopathy Discussion | 11 | 15th June 2003 08:37 PM |
| Totality of symptoms in homeopathy is a wrong concept. | Dr. MAS | Homeopathy Discussion | 43 | 20th September 2001 03:12 AM |