What is GV? George Vithoulkas?

Who are referring too Albert?

******************************

Btw, an update:
Demspter is fine now. The wound is almost completely healed and he's back to his normal self. No more weight loss either.

My homeopath's reasons for choosing Sulph were not fully explained, or justified to me. I only shared what I recalled being discussed. Therefore, my potrayal of her decision may not be thorough enough for you or anyone else to pick apart reasonably. But I appreciate the food for thought!

*****************
P.S. Albert, if you edit your posts -- perhaps so everyone can follow a 'change of thought' you might just quote your old post (in a new post in the same thread) and then add the change. Otherwise, there is a LOT of wading since your posts tend to be very long.

[ 15. June 2003, 15:21: Message edited by: LisaAnnan ]

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

Yeah, but it's about 100 times better than they had in the 19th century with LPHs, which is how the HPHs feel about LPHs, and rightly so.
Argh...

Wow!
I would say that is way fast.
I must have been wrong then.
Interesting how close medicines can seem indicated best.
Accurate information at the start is the key, and that's damn hard with furfaces.

I really dislike saying that about them, but at least they almost know how to think homeopathically and are onto some good stuff like the four-conical-envelopes model of man.
OOps!
Guess they goofed again; it isn't three, Georgie-poo.
Arf!

Glad to hear it.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

It was fast. I think by yesterday, I knew he was okay. Today just confirms it. He's meowching for his food like he normally would (he's such a vocal cat). And, he's even lying on me again, etc...

Your analysis made sense, and when I first read it - I almost thought, 'well, get ready for a relapse'...but so far, he's doing fantabulous.

So, what was your point about my homeopath anyway? Are you saying she's an HPH?

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

GeezOpete, this takes forever to delete with flood control .

[ 15. June 2003, 19:01: Message edited by: LisaAnnan ]

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

Treble up .

[ 15. June 2003, 19:00: Message edited by: LisaAnnan ]

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

Geeeeez - something like a quadruple post .

[ 15. June 2003, 18:59: Message edited by: LisaAnnan ]

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

You said: 'well, get ready for a relapse'

Yeah, the discussion on the simillimum was poignant from me because I was reflecting about it due to two cases I stuck my face into here.
Close enough will generally cure, so we cannot ever know which was the better medicine, and maybe Pyrogen could have been better. It pushed my buttons without me being able to remember, and that can happen with me due to case reports from the old literature that impressed me but without details remembered.
Not sure such arguments can be put forward, though, in the face of so quick of a cure.

What a miraculous system, huh?
It goes POOF! you're cured!

-------

I have pet peeves with the GVs because I know it well as one from afore and want to sneer since I spent about 10 years failing to find a single article from one of them that didn't reek of mistakes, until I simply stopped reading their stuff.
Argh...Arf!
Problem is, they're all over the place.
Only two or three journals are worth reading to me now.
If you want to read our views about them without my diatribes and harrangs, the CHQ is always off the scale and covers that subject too.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

Before re-reading Hahnemann's lost paper on verterinary homeopathy, entitled "The Homeopathic Science of Healing Domestic Animals" (CLASSICAL HOMOEOPATHY QUARTERLY "2/91," Vol. 4, No. 2, 1991, pp. 66-72), it was my understanding that it was among those sitting fallow, untranslated from his last years as a Parisian. OOps!

Three facts indicate it was from his days in Leipsig:

1. It was found in the Library of the University of Leipsig;

2. Nobody mentioned by Daniel Kaiser, who seems to have discovered the paper, says other than Hahnemann's years in Leipsig was its origin; and

3. It was addressed to the "Royal Society of Economists," which (says Kaiser) "most likely meant the Society of Economists of Leipzig, of which Hahnemann was an honorary member."

Thus, contrary to what I thought and posted in the case analysis above, twern't written late from Paris and 'twas lost and found in Leipsig; but 'tis, as I said, spectacular prose typical from Hahnemann's quil.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

It's not Latin, it's quasi-Latin for joketh-liketh funicus: e.g., for doggies or "doags" (Texas speak) it could be:

Feminicus caninicus arficus, or

Malicus caninicus barkicus-ufficus.

Haven't you ever seen the Road Runner & Willy Cyote cartoons from Warner Bros., who are perhaps more famous for Bugs Bunny and Looney Toones?

Every episode identifies the two with new funny names for them, like:

Road-runnicus fasticus birdy-poo, and

Stupidicus cyoticus boomicus.

[ 28. June 2003, 05:12: Message edited by: Hahnemannian444 ]

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B