Ricky, I am not homeopath nor medical doctor.. Please clarify for me..

coryza and catarrh are same or not? You said in your first post these are same words (inflamation of mucous membrane)

__________________
<b>With warmest regards<br />Q.T</b>

Hi cuty,

I was doing chatting with my friend online and he said "Ricky cross posted incomplete reply from that mailing list to here"

He forwarded me the following mail which was appeared in some where in mailing list.

I don't know from where he took this reference. These words are used in different context.

[ 25. April 2003, 06:54: Message edited by: Medical Officer ]

Shirley Reichman said on this board that cross posting is not allowed. I don't have the ruling of Jon Haworth on this issue at this bb. As I am not the member of any other forum or mailing lists. Who allowed Ricky to cross post incomplete reply that was without context and mere try to deceive members on this board.

She very boldly said at this forum that she is working with Dr. Rama and treating cancer patients. When she has no idea about the meaning of two simple words. How can she treat people with homeopathy. [img]redface.gif[/img]

I had the idea but I was interested to listen from her.

__________________
<b>With warmest regards<br />Q.T</b>

Ricky,

You said Do you want to say, it was you who posted the answer in that mailing list? That is why you (that person) has no objection on you (herself) At one instance you said someone posted the reply and now you said that someone has no objection. My dear Cross posting whether you have the permission or not is not allowed on this board. Where it is written that you can cross post the content of the post with permission.

I again request you please clarify whether these two words are same or not?

If these words are same then why different symptoms for these two words are written in different way in kent?

[ 26. April 2003, 04:00: Message edited by: Cuty ]

__________________
<b>With warmest regards<br />Q.T</b>

I've been offline for a few days so have not been able to comment on what some of you above have said.
Yes I did cross post but the person who wrote this has no objection. What is more interesting is that Julian Winston has just posted the same on yet another list!!!

Medical Officer - I am not trying to deceive anyone. Where on earth have you got that from??Also I am not WORKING with Dr R but I attend a post grad course that he is giving in the UK which began last year and will probably not end until next year. I also am not treating cancer patients but those who are in remission after removal of cancer and/or chemo/radio treatment. If I did get an active cancer patient I would probably treat using Dr R's protocol.
Maybe this is a language problem which causes you to incorrectly interpret things that I written .

__________________
RSHom - Registered Homeopath

Yes! without a doubt it is a language problem. What I have the information is, Dr. R set of rules is to treat cancer the patients both with the help of allopathy and homeopathic medicine. This is not a classical loom. You said at so many junctures that you are a classical homeopath, after getting training of that protocol how can you implement that protocol by adopting classical approach? I think you have followed my point?

You said on this board that you don’t use allopathy and homeopathic treatment all together on your patients, in other words you said “ You don’t recommend allopathic medicine with homeopathy”, but at the same time you said if your patients are getting treatment (allopathy) from any other practitioner and if they seek advice from you then you don’t advice them to stop taking that allopathic medicine with homeopathy in particular for those women who are on contraceptive pills.

Now this point is beyond my comprehension that if somebody else is prescribing allopathic medicine for your patients then it is O.K. You are also putting your patients on homeopathic medicine at the same time. How can you say this is a pure classical approach and secondly how can you praise homeopathy alone?

When I think classical or non-classical approach is does not matter, the patients health is important if in your opinion that stopping allopathic medicine could harm your patients condition then you are doing very right thing. I don’t understand why are you so confused about classical or non-classical approach. You must admit on this board that you adopted the non-classical approach for the time being and when you felt that the patient is now come out danger then you again started treating the patient by adopting classical approach. I fully support your protocol.

Why do you want to give the impression that you are doing absolute classical homeopathy, when you yourself admitting something else on this board. [img]redface.gif[/img]

P.S, You gave the impression on this board that Coryza and Catarrh are the same words, While these words have been used in different context in homeopathic repertory. Can you deny? A simple repertory (not complete) tells us that the Coryza has 48 natures of symptoms and catarrh 39.


Nose - Catarrh 177 medicine
Nose – Coryza 197 medicine


If these words are same then

Will you add [Nose – Coryza] instead of adding [Nose – Catarrh. ]

Will you add [Nose - Discharge; Watery; Without Coryza] instead of adding [ Nose - Acute, catarrh in ordinary cold]

I was watching this thread coming up and up again and again. The reason being that you are emphasizing on a wrong point so every member those read this thread unable to stop themselves for putting a query for you. I also could not stop my self to force you to stop putting spat on wrong obsession. Coryza and Catarrh have been used in different circumstance and framework and have different meanings and implementation. These words are not same. I think you should come boldly and admit this simple point, as greatness lays in acceptance. We are student and no body is authority on any subject.

CATARRH:

Inflamation of mucous membranes,especially those of the air passages, associated with mucoid exudate.

CORYZA:

1. Inflammation of the mucous membranes of the nose, usually marked by sneezing and discharge of watery mucous.
2. Sometimes the common cold.

In the case of catarrh one can have; catarral conjunctivitis, catarral jaundice, catarral otis media.

Corya is associated with the nose as in the common cold.

Hope this may help someone still confused.

Regards Scruffrat

Medical officer, the reply which was incomplete and cross posted here by Ricky was taken from HPE mailing list.

YOu will be amazed and at the same time astonished to read that many people are confused about these words on another mailing list. Although they have very big name in homeopathy. If you could read those replies then I am sure you will collide your head with your near wall.

I think Dr. asif explantion is complete and accurate.

Now the question is which one is a disease and which one represents a condition. coryza and catarrh.

[ 26. April 2003, 21:42: Message edited by: Secret Agent ]

you will collide your head with your near wall.

Now thats funny. You can come out of your room.