Dear Friends
Having been alerted today to your discussions and being invited to comment, I am delighted to contribute.

I completed my work in Ethiopia last August and I am now dedicated to trying to get people, homeopaths and doctors all over the world to try it out. Only by creating an overwhelming body of knowledge and results can this pandemic remedy be believed and used. I have difficulty believing it also. Even after seeing 200+ cases. If this is to be the dream ticket answer to HIV, it needs HELP from people like you. I can send you the research and results profile needed to do this.

Here are some general answers
About money.
I have donated the remedy free, enough to treat every AIDS patient in the world. I will keep doing this. You can buy it on the www, but if that’s difficult, for example almost no one in Africa has credit cards, I will and do send it for free, as I do daily. All I need is an address. But those who can pay, please do so. I have survived on donations for over a year now, from friends and friends of friends and worked for no fee. I expect to continue this way until it is successful. I am determined that the remedy is available free to all who need it to be free. This not an easy lifestyle, surviving from donation to donation. It tests my poverty issues to the core. If you know how I can get wealthy and keep it free for all, tell me how.

Does this remedy work?
If you doubt me, do that, but please try the remedy on just one person and see. What have you got to loose?

How did I make the remedy?
I will try to keep this succinct.
The inventive part is clear I think.
I surmised that as like cures like, this must be an example of a much more profound ‘law’ or principle in nature of which we are only dimly aware. I therefore surmised that like may create like. This is a theory. My results suggest that this is true.

This is obviously a big jump, a major step in making homeopathic remedies to order, completely independent of the HIV issue. There are two core issues here, designing remedies and HIV.

Making a magnetic remedy is easy. You just succuss a vial containing alcohol/water in a magnetic field. Though the theory of magnetic effects on water is still unclear, yet the effect of magnetic fields on the brain is well known (MRI), as on birds and lobsters who navigate by it.
And the inner nature of what electricity and magnetism really are,(vital force) is also unknown, as I understand it. We can only see and manipulate their effects.

To make the magnetic field you need a coil, a ferrite core, and an electrical signal, just like the innards of a loud speaker. The ferrite core needs a gap big enough for a vial so the field goes through the vial containing water during succussion. This is all standard technology.

How do you make the analogue/likeness?
There are two points here.

One is that if I reveal all, the technique could be stolen, and I am not prepared to allow that. I cannot patent it as that involves £10,000 or so to do it well which I don’t have. But more importantly I want time to do more inventing, as I would expect to make more patentable improvements in the process. This means I must hold back on certain ideas so that I have time to cover all options before revealing all in a published patent.

I think this invention has tremendous potential, even to change the face of medicine as we know it. So powerful forces are in play here. Hence the caution.

About the Analogue.
The first thing to say is that all things in nature are in essence simple, and are not complicated, and fractals are an expression of that idea, as is pattern recognition.
A tree gets reduced to a simple formula that reproduces itself in an infinite variation around one ‘strange’ attractor. Likewise a sea wave. Likewise an element is electrons, nucleus, charges and shells. Add an electron, change the element. Likewise we reduce the pattern of a person to a single remedy.

So the first thing is to decide on the essential pattern that is HIV. This is homeopathy on a larger scale, humanity as a whole. You can start with the HIV totality, which can be constructed from both the global phenomena and the hard facts, the symptom picture and the medical research and pathological information. That’s a huge body of fact and fiction.

How I achieve my analysis is by first getting involved on all levels. I have to know inside me, the patients with the disease, hugging them goodbye really helps. I cannot say exactly how this works, but physical contact is part of healing, part for me of understanding, and I am not sure I can work without it. I have to deeply embrace the pandemic so it becomes part of me, my inner understanding. From this inner soil, the understanding of what it is can grow. I can intune and intuit the way. It’s exactly the same as with individual patients, except here you need hundreds of patients before the understanding comes about. From all this you have to deduce, intuit, dream, analyses, ponder, reflect, consider, meditate and finally realise what HIV really is, its core pattern.

To make an analogue of this pattern, is to make a circuit or model, or magnetic field model that mimics the essential pattern; this is standard technology once you have the pattern.

I know that does not answer everything. It answers everything I can without giving everything away. If this is not sufficiently clear, please ask and I can try to clarify it further.

Nosode
I considered the nosode route and making one from twenty different blood samples. However I could not think of any nosode that effectively treated the active disease it was made from. Nor any logic why it should.

Universal
It is not a universal remedy. It’s a pandemic remedy for HIV.

What is HIV/AIDS
In my experience, and I queried this, AIDS is a very specific disease. You cannot confuse it with any other. I have explained this very clearly on my website. There is a clear progression, a clear diagnosis and a clear prognosis. It’s basically a ten years till you die process.

Individual versus pandemic
Like cures like individually is undoubtedly a higher way of cure normally. This HIV remedy is like an intelligent nosode. The two approaches together should be fantastic. But most of Africa has no homeopaths. 8000 REAL PEOPLE are dying every day. What is wrong with having an effective HIV nosode? And individual homeopathy, in my opinion, is not as good as this remedy for HIV. David Johnson’s comments on this issue around pandemics are very clear.

Member Opium, I do not yet understand you!

To one specific set of questions I wrote this
One problem with this HIV remedy is that I have done two things together. I have created a new way to make remedies, to design them to order, under the pressure of circumstances. And I am claiming a remedy for the HIV pandemic. Mixing these two together is confusing.
How I work is intuitively to a significant extent. If you think you act differently you should consider what Hume, a famous enlightenment philosopher (AD 1750 see google/hume) said. In a nut shell, Reason and Logic are essentially based upon feelings, the same as expressed in a saloon bar.
What I did initially as was to get my feet wet by immerging myself in the problem, i.e. HIV/AIDS by putting myself in a situation where I did that and nothing else. I got involved, and lived and breathed, and hugged and kissed, patients with HIV and AIDS, and a lot more TB, for example. I had the patients all day, I visited them on their death beds, I treated them, I gradually understood the problem, first hand inside myself. I seriously considered using the lab to centrifuge twenty peoples blood to make up one sample, then to make a good nosode. I considered many other options. I searched Encycopedia Homeopathica and Reference Works using my data for many evenings after clinic. And lots more.
This took three months hard grind. Then I stood back and reflected on my options, for several weeks. I considered all the options I knew. I talked extensively to my colleagues and friends. I decided that I had to go for gold, the pandemic remedy. It was the only option in a continent without almost any homeopaths, and with the projected expectation of 100 million infected people.
>
I then sat down, drew upon my whole life experience and decided what to do. I turned homeopathy on its head, figured like must create like, and knowing the HIV/AIDS picture I wanted, created a remedy by the like makes like surmise to treat the people. See above how

Can you imagine my nervously I felt when the first patient came back? Can you imagine the delight when it was clearly working. Can you imagine the slowly dawning realization that everyone was getting better, except those with extreme situations, like starving to death?

Thanking you all for your interest

Peter Chappell

Dr. Chappell, welcome to this place in which one possesses all my respects.
I sent the information about his remedy to the AFADH French association to which I belong. Also I have spread it between my group in Spain and am to the wait of receiving some information of the experience of some doctors.
I will put in touch with you if I manage to receive information that can be interested.
I repeat my respects towards you and wish him the better thing.
I believe that it is you a great person.

P.D.
I will try that someone translates the message that I wrote in the discussion on the PCI in order that you can understand it. I do not write English good.

[ 15. January 2003, 10:34: Message edited by: Opium ]

Dear Peter

May I put a few comment or questions behind your statements?
You wrote:
>>Only by creating an overwhelming body of knowledge and results can this pandemic remedy be believed and used. I have difficulty believing it also.<<

I suggest an even easier way:
Do a full homeopathic proving. I think, as so many lives and hopes and futures depend on the right curative remedy at the right time, we have the responsibility to make sure, that the remedy we give now is chosen according curative principles. Believe is good—Apriory knowledge is better.

>>Does this remedy work?
If you doubt me, do that, but please try the remedy on just one person and see. What have you got to loose?<<

I think if I take a remedies of which I am not convinced off that they work, I can ---of course-- loose. Time, health, even live--.
If I give such a doubtful remedy to my patients I can console myself that I will --at the most-- loose a patient, but it would not do me personally any harm. I don.t expect your view to be of that kind, that one more or less aids sufferer left to die because of remedies don’t work makes no difference.

Unfortionally you try to keep the exact procedure of creating this remedy secret.
This on the other side does not allow me to share results of the experiments we did in the 80’ and 90’ with similar remedies. What I want to hint to you is the following finding:
The remedies arrived by similar means did NOT keep their information. Some of those actually went off within a very short time.
I am prepared to discuss this in detail, as soon as you’r ready to share your exact knowledge with us.

>>Likewise we reduce the pattern of a person to a single remedy.<<

A bit of philosophy here-- Remedies do not personify, nor is personality disease.
Homeopaths prescribe not by analogy but by symptom similitude.

>>So the first thing is to decide on the essential pattern that is HIV. This is homeopathy on a larger scale, humanity as a whole. You can start with the HIV totality, which can be constructed from both the global phenomena and the hard facts, the symptom picture and the medical research and pathological information. That’s a huge body of fact and fiction.<<

Are you referring to Hahnemann’s findings about the psora? Hahnemann did not construct the chronic miasma: psora—he observed it and was able to see the patterns. First,-- like you, he was delighted and thought, that there is one remedy which can cure the multitude of ailments all originating from psora.
But disappointment followed, as he realised, that psora is not a static disease and therefore at the end of his live he had a list of already 43 remedies with abilities to cure psora. It is inevitable that you will arrive at similar conclusions if you follow unprejudiced observation.

>>How I achieve my analysis is by first getting involved on all levels. I have to know inside me, the patients with the disease, hugging them goodbye really helps. I cannot say exactly how this works, but physical contact is part of healing, part for me of understanding, and I am not sure I can work without it. I have to deeply embrace the pandemic so it becomes part of me, my inner understanding. From this inner soil, the understanding of what it is can grow. I can intune and intuit the way. It’s exactly the same as with individual patients, except here you need hundreds of patients before the understanding comes about. From all this you have to deduce, intuit, dream, analyses, ponder, reflect, consider, meditate and finally realise what HIV really is, its core pattern.<<

I can see an element of interpretation in your process of investigation. This leads us away from what actually is and what not. So the results of your technique of analysis do not necessarily reflect Aids as it is, but represent also intermingled a good bit of Peter- interpretation. So—a remedy created on this information might not necessarily a counterpart/ counteract to AIDS.

>>This HIV remedy is like an intelligent nosode.<<

You have me confused here—Intelligent Nosode?
Intelligence is the ability to recognize given to higher states of live.
Do you mean, that your remedy is alive, has senses, can recognize?

Here is my own view:
I appreciate every effort being made to alleviate the plight of the Aids sufferers. Still for the novice in homeopathy it is not helpful to call something homeopathic which cannot be used according homeopathic rules and principles. The mere disappearance of a symptom under the action of a remedy does not mean, that the remedy has cured it. The symptom could have been gone on its own account, or it could have been suppressed by the remedy. Only, if the symptom in question was a symptom unique to the remedy as being brought out in its proving, which was done apriory to the application to the diseased, then one can claim to have cured. But in order to achieve this we need the proving first. Otherwise we have no guarantee, that the remedy can, if applied according the principals act curative.

__________________
Hans Weitbrecht
Consultant Homeopath
homeopathy study guide: http://www.homeopathyworldcommunity....hy-study-guide

Dear Peter,

A pleasant surprise to see you post on this board.

David Johnson first alerted me to your article in the Links which I have not yet recieved, when I was talking to him bout a new AIDS Hospice that is to be opened here in South India, quite close to where I live.

It is a charitable venture, also dependant completely on donations, run by the Church, and to be looked after by a congregation of nuns, with a special vocation to care for the terminally ill. The patients are to be cared for free, whether rich or poor in a lovely location,
surrounded by the beauty of nature.

I was considering the possibility of offering them my services, when David mentioned the new remedy you were talking about. I do intend in the coming months to purchase it from you, and will be in touch about it. IT was wonderful to think that I could offer something that could give these people another lease on life and I'm sure they would be grateful for the hope.

We wish you abundant blessings from God for the work you are doing, and good health to you and family as well.
Leela

[ 24. January 2003, 17:37: Message edited by: doctorleela ]

__________________
http://www.homeopathy2health.com

Dear Peter Chappel, I know you are so busy person. You spared sometime for us. I really apprceciate your efforts and works. Please find more time and read completely David Johnson thread which is available on the following link

First page

http://www.homeopathyhome.com/ultima...2;t=006816;p=1

Second page

http://www.homeopathyhome.com/ultima...2;t=006816;p=2

and answer the quries by pressing post reply button.

Dr. Chappell: This it is my message in the discussion on PC1 better translated. I hope that you now understand it. An embrace.

I defend Unicist Homeopathy (Classical Homeopathy, as you call it) as well as the individualization of the patient above all other considerations. I believe that there is a remedy, a simillimum, which remains the same for the entire life of the patient, as the remedy which balances the totality, in the acute picture as much as in the chronic one. Consequently, if there is a simillimum remedy to administer, I do not put my trust in any specifics. However, ... I would NEVER dare to pass judgment lightly on Dr. Peter Chappell, whom I consider a missionary of homeopathy and an honest person! And I don't know a lot about him --probably about the same that you know, just whatever I have read. Nevertheless I do understand his motives to keep the secret about his remedy. I think I would do the same thing, if, as Gpm says, I could have in my whole life a single day resembling one of Doctor Chappell's days.
We know that a remedy capable of curing AIDS, even in some AIDS patients only, would be a remedy which would be controlled by the prevailing powerful interests. And they would never administer it to poor countries, far less free of charge.
Come on, ...what is the matter with you?
Does anybody have a better remedy to cure AIDS?
Do you have any ideas about it?
What kind of backing for Dr. Chappell's remedy are we demanding, whether at an official level or at the level of acknowledgment, from the laboratories? Especially us, homeopaths, historically persecuted because of lacking that very backing. Do we want the seal of approval from powerful interests which control millions of dollars and which are ready to kill in order to maintain their power and status?
I want to reiterate my total trust in the simillimum remedy. However, I think that Dr. Peter Chappell's remedy deserves something more than the benefit of the doubt (or the presumption of innocence) on our part. Essentially, because, although most likely it will not cure AIDS --and this is just one issue--, it is a completely different matter to rush to judgment on our part, without real knowledge about it, or to accuse him of being a quack or a charlatan.
I think that what we should do is to start studying feverishly whether the remedy PC1 produces or doesn't produce results. Because, while we are putting this man on trial, there are people who are suffering and who would be very thankful for the results of our research.

Homeoman: The homeopathy YES has rules, natural rules so important that nobody can leave of them. The law of the similarity. The laws of the treatment, the sense of the disease and the inverse one of the treatment.
My opinion is that yes there are laws and the whole doctrinaire body of the Homeopathy is in the Organon. But it is not chance that the first Paragraph of the Organon contains these words:
" The only and high mission of the doctor is it of restoring the health in the patients, that it is what is called to recover. "
It is possible that the remedy of the Dr. Chappell not abide strictly to the laws of the homeopathy (one will see later if it answers to other natural laws), it is possible, I say, that should not follow the law of the similarity and of the individuality, but without life, there is no possibility of treatment ¡ and the people are dying of AIDS!
I believe that we are applying the Hahnemann's first Paragraph, for saving the life, to be able to apply later the rules of the Homeopathy.

Thanks of God Peter Chappell has not been "mixed among us" Because this way while many of us have spent our time in sterile discussions, if not many times defaming others, He, the Peter Chappell was working hardly to help people who is suffering all around the world and trying to find a remedy to cure them.

I am not so happy with the appearance of Peter in this discussion list, because it will never be a very good place for him. The only thing he certainly can learn over here is that he is loosing his time and wasting his patience in discussions with people who previously comes to this place with the intention and the conviction that they know everything about everything in Homeopathy.

I hope that Peter Chappell still continue doing his job hardly, helping other people and maintaining their remedy in secrete, at least until his remedy has been enough tested, and all of you over here can become modestly enough to recognize how worthy their remedy can be for all HIV-AIDS patients around the world.

Thanks Peter for your work, and keep doing it in the best way you can, the way you are doing now.

[ 15. January 2003, 18:13: Message edited by: Dinis Luis ]

__________________
Dinis S Luis (DHom)<br />Classical Homeopathy<br />Diplomaed by "The School of Homeopathy", Devon, U.K.

That's very well expressed, Opium. It may be that after provings are done on the remedy, that if we were to apply the strict rules of individualization and similimum, it would turn out to be the genus epidemicus. In the meantime, we need to look at the results and do whatever we can to help.

I was in a workshop several years ago where a doctor in the San Fracisco area had treated a number of AIDs patients. He found that Lacheses was the most commonly needed remedy. At the time, all of his cases that had followed his instructions were in remission.

In the situation where such a high percentage of the population is ill, there is no money to treat them, and there are no homeopaths, if there is something that has shown good effect, we can't turn our backs on it. And as a body of evidence is built up, it could possibly be applied universally. In a situation where the similimum isn't apparant after analysing the case, then it could be the treatment of choice.

__________________
Shirley Reischman

After watching shirley's cat for five minutes...and realising it wasn't going to do anything unpredictable...I have this question. Am I following what Peter is saying somewhat...that he acted as a channel....an empty vessel..to pick up all the vibes of the patients...and then "captured" that vibration in a vial where he magnetized them? Or am I way off base?