otherhealth.com  

Go Back   otherhealth.com > Homeopathy > Homeopathy Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2002, 03:17 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 54
Stranger
Post

I believe that repertory has limitation. You can not entirely depend upon repertory for selecting remedy. Just like the story of Aladin. Whenever Aladdin wanted anything he would rub the lamp and the thing wanted would be provided by the magic lamp. I can't expect all these things from repertory.

I believe that without taking proper symptom one can not reach to similimum remedy and without similimum remedy one can not hope for cure.

My question is if a patient is suffering from fever, cold, sneezing, coryza, cough, severe pain in stomach and severe headache.

Then which symptom should be treated first?

On which symptom we can base our first prescription?

ONE WILL BE DOOMED IF ONE ENTIRELY DEPENDS UPON THE RESULTS OF MATHEMATICAL CALCULATION (select remedy which covers all symptoms: a rule) OF THE REPERORIZATION.

Looking for serious ... Comments
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2002, 04:45 PM
sreischman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,428
sreischman is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

None of the above. You find the modalities, how he feels different than before becoming ill, what triggered the illness, the common threads running through all of the symptoms.
__________________
Shirley Reischman
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2002, 04:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Bloomington Indiana
Posts: 230
john oljace is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Dear Stranger:

You asked:
I believe that without taking proper symptom one can not reach to similimum remedy and without similimum remedy one can not hope for cure.

My question is if a patient is suffering from fever, cold, sneezing, coryza, cough, severe pain in stomach and severe headache.

Then which symptom should be treated first?

If it is not clear which symptom troubles the patient the most, you first look at each complaint and consider what potentially is the most debilitating for the patient. If a person has colitis and says their main complaint is a stuffy nose, you need to focus on colitits as it can potentially kill you! If all seem equally debilitating then you need to find out how much energy they use or which symptoms take more energy. It is excessive energy use that keeps the body from healing itself. Also, if you ask them what is the worse thing about each symptom and what they do to deal with it and how they feel about it, you can often determine which symptom is torubeling them the most. You will also see for some symptoms their response to having the symptoms is the same which indicates energy use and what needs fixed. So in your example with stomach and head pain you may find the quality of the pain is a pressing out pain and that both of these pains are reduced by hard pressure and you may find out their emotional response to the pain is irritability vs. say feeling sad and then you find out what makes both these or other symptoms better or worse and you find common ideas that will point toward their response to the symptoms/disease.

The key is to find the common qualities of symptoms and how they feel about them as a response to them and what they do. usually a major theme or idea will repeat itself so you know you are tracking the true cheif complaint and what needs fixed.

Hope this is helpful

John Oljace

[ 07. December 2002, 16:58: Message edited by: john oljace ]
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 7th December 2002, 09:35 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: España
Posts: 266
Opium is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

I agree totally with you, the repertory is not the panacea, what is necessary to can search in the repertory, or as Hahnemann was saying, to know what it is necessary to treat in every patient. And I am of I agree also in that without the simillimum there is no healing. Now then, from my concept unicista, the medicine simillimum is one and does not change during the whole life of the patient, does not change, since they do not change the finger fingerprints.
It(He,She) is all the same that the picture is chronic or sharp(acute), patient falls ill with an individual form, with "his("its") form and not with other one. To find this remedy that initiates the movement of treatment(healing), it is necessary to know what it is necessary to treat, observe what our patient suffers, to think which it is the deep disease, and it does not seem to me that the disease can be any of the mentioned symptoms, so as Sreischman says, none of these symptoms would take to find the simillimum. It(he,she) is more, if the patient was a really serious patient to organic level, of cancer for example and was doing a picture of this type, with sneezes, cough, fever, etc., we would be present at symptoms dismiss in a curative sense and it would be a serious mistake to treat them. A thing is to treat and different other one is to recover, and sometimes is not necessary to treat to allow to recover. Greeting

[ 29. April 2003, 22:48: Message edited by: Opium ]
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 8th December 2002, 04:07 AM
Cuty's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Sarina
Posts: 69
Cuty
Post

In the past, a confused (research oriented mind) person initiated a title that totality of symptom is wrong concept in homeopathy. Many HOMEOPATHS opposed him. I am confused which rule is applicable whether we should include all symptoms of the patient or only most important symptom

At that time all main regular member opposed him. But he forced that it is wrong concept. Now what are your views today..
__________________
<b>With warmest regards<br />Q.T</b>
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2002, 09:58 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Pakistan
Posts: 54
Stranger
Post

thanks for sharing thoughts
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2002, 01:28 PM
sreischman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,428
sreischman is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

Include the totality of the persons diseased state, which may or may not include the totality of signs and symptoms. While the philosophy of homeopathy is scientific, the practice of it is an art. If the practice of it were not an art, anyone could buy a software program and become a great homeopath. Instead, what I've often seen, is that once the person starts using the computer, their success rate decreases, because they just lump all the symptoms together.
__________________
Shirley Reischman
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2002, 04:09 PM
sreischman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Posts: 1,428
sreischman is an unknown quantity at this point
Post

I tend to agree. However, it's not only an art. There are parts that are scientific, actually more so than allopathic medicine.
__________________
Shirley Reischman
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2002, 04:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Canada
Posts: 718
kkrista
Post

Homeoman, Without "observation" there would be NO science. Observation is a key element and dates back to the beginning of time. It is through observation that we have been able to formulate, fixed calculations.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 11th December 2002, 07:32 PM
Medical Officer's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: J J Hospital, Pakistan.
Posts: 59
Medical Officer
Post

Shiley statment;
Quote:
Include the totality of the persons diseased state, which may or may not include the totality of signs and symptoms. While the philosophy of homeopathy is scientific, the practice of it is an art. If the practice of it were not an art, anyone could buy a software program and become a great homeopath. Instead, what I've often seen, is that once the person starts using the computer, their success rate decreases, because they just lump all the symptoms together.
No philisophy is not scientific. Even the philosophy of any subject is not scientific. The word philosophy itself is telling you it is not scientific. I agree some portion of homeopathy is based on availabale scientific needs but not all.

As for as the art is concerned practicing of all therapies are art. It is not new thing with homeopathy. practice of allopathy, homeopathy, magenetotherapy, acupuncture, herbal, electro homeopathy, or other therapies are all art.

I agree by just feeding symptom into the computer, you can not get proper result. But may be you will agree to me. It is all happening in homeopathic community.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT. The time now is 01:34 PM.



The information contained on OtherHealth.com arises by way of discussion between contributors and should not be treated as a substitute for the advice provided by your own personal physician or other health care professional. None of the contributions on this site are an endorsement by the site owners of any particular product, or a recommendation as to how to treat any particular disease or health-related condition. If you suspect you have a disease or health-related condition of any kind, you should contact your own health care professional immediately. Please read the BB Rules for further details.
Please consult personally with your own health care professional before starting any diet, exercise, supplementation or medication program.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2
Copyright © 2009 otherhealth.com