To All Members!

In homeopathy we can prescribe any remedy to any patient.

In my opinion there is no fixed/absolute rule in homoeopathy, on which you could base your prescription. It is all depend upon the Doctor, who is dealing with the patient and consider himself that in which box, he/her will place the patient according to patient’s situation.

There are approx 30 methods/procedure, which one may adopt. In homeopathy you could prescribe remedy on the following basis

On Constitution (A complete picture of a patient)

On Miasm (It is just a hypothesis.)

On Drug picture (Comparing patient with a single remedy)

On symptoms (But not total symptoms of a patient)

On disease Names (So many diseases are mentioned as symptoms in materia medica)

On remedies action (specifics) (Arnica will help in smooth blood circulation)

On clinical observation (although the remedy which is going to be prescribe, has no such symptom in materia medica)

When you will deal with a patient listen every thing. Then judge your self and see, on the basis of strong symptoms, in which box you will place the patient e.g. constitutional box, miasmatic box, totality of symptom box, disease box, remedies specifics box or clinical trial box. etc If in your opinion the patient is fit in miasmatic box, have strong symptoms on miasm then add only those symptoms in your computer which are directly linked with miasm and discard all other symptoms.

On Patient next visit, see, which miasmatic complains are gone and which are still alive. You will observe that beside miasmatic symptoms, some other general symptoms are also gone.

Again repertorize the case in full sense, take all symptoms of a patient, analyze them, and see again, in which box you will place the patient, this time. If in your opinion the patient is now may be treated on his/her general symptom then add all general symptom of that patient, which have direct linked with his/her complain and discard all other general symptoms.

There are so many methods, you can apply in homeopathy for prescription. No body knows, which method a homeopath will adopt for his/her patient. In homeopathy there is no rule. We have to depend upon the doctor’s own choice for selection of method out of more then 30 procedures/methods.

In homeopathy we can prescribe any remedy to any patient. There are absolutely no rules. You can not object on any prescription. It is homoeopathy. Prescription is based on doctor’s own choice.

Be remain a witness!

Gratefully yours

---------------------------------------.

Dr.MAS

[ 20. November 2002, 05:15: Message edited by: DR.MAS ]

Vaccination or immunization process is another process to prescribe homeo remedies.
I want to write on the topic in detail.
For instance the bell has gone. I am going to class.

Generally I don’t believe in giving references. If someone interested then it is possible to think about that. Here are some of the Homeopathic Medicines, which can be used as preventive medicines against some diseases. May be it will provide help to some interested members

Scalet Fever >>>> Belladona 1M (Practiced by Samuel Hahnemann)
Scalet Fever >>>> Scalatinum 1M
Sore Throat >>>>> Psorinum 1M (Allen Suggested this option)
Sore Throat (Recurrent) >>>>> Baryta Carb 1M
Styes >>>>> Psorinum 1M (Allen Suggested this option)
Styes (Recurrent) >>>>> Sulphur 1M (Kent Preventive Prescription)
Diptheria >>>>> Merc Cynatus, Diptherinum 10M
Diptheria >>>>> Apis m
Measles >>>> Pulsatilla (Samuel Hahnemann also tried this option)
Measles >>>>>> Morbillinum 1M
Measles >>>>>> Acon, Ars a 200
Influenza >>>>> Arsenic Alb, Rhus Tox, Baptesia
Boils >>>>> Gunpowder
Whitlow >>>>> Silicea
Asian Influenza >>>>> Influenzinum, Hispanicum 200
Whooping Cough >>>>> Pertussin 200, Dros
Mumps >>>>> Parotidnum 30 (Dr. Wadia), Trifol rep
Virus of Any kind >>>>> Kali mur (Dr.MAS)
Aids >>>>> Streptococin (Dr.MAS)
Whooping Cough >>>>> Pertussin 200
Croup >>>>> Phosphorus 10M
Small Pox >>>>> Malandrium 10 (Schmidt), Variolinum 1M
Small Pox >>>>> Ant t, Vaccin
Cholera >>>>> Choleratoxin 1M, Camphora 200
Cholera >>>>> Lachesis 200, Sulphur 200
Cholera >>>>> Cup M, Verat a, Ars a
Yellow Fever >>>>> Cimicifuga 1M, Crot h
Fever (Intermittent) >>>>> Ars a, Chin s, Sulph (Clark)
Hay Fever >>>>> Ars a, Psor 1M
Hydrophoia >>>>> Ars a, Bell, Canth, Hyos
Hydrophoia >>>>> Hydrophobinum, Scutellaria (Rafinesque)
Hepatitis >>>>> Nat Sulph 1M
Appendicits >>>>> Psor 1M (Dr.MAS)
Malaria >>>>> Eupetorium Perf 200, Malaria Officinalis 200
Malaria >>>>> Natrium Mur 200
Tetnus >>>>> Ledum 200, Thuja 1M, Mag phos
Tetnus >>>>> Arnica 10M, Tetanotoxin 1M, Hyp
Chilblains >>>>> Sulphur 10M, Tub bov 200
Herpes (Recurrent) >>>>> Heper Sulph 10 M
Erysipelas >>>>> Graphites 1M
Heat Stroke >>>>> Glonine 10M
Diarrhoea (Emotional) >>>>> Gels 10M, Arg Nit 10M
Abortion (2nd Months) >>>>> Kali Carb 1M
Abortion (3rd Months) >>>>> Sabina 1M (William Boericke)
Abortion (7th Months) >>>>> Sepia 1M (By Pierre Schmidt)
Abortion (Fright) >>>>> Acon Nap CM (Clark’s Interest)
Abortion (Debility) >>>>> Alet, Caul, Chin, Helon, Sec C.
Abortion (Threatened) >>>>> Sec cor (Clark’s suggestion)
Expected Convulsions (After Delivery) >>>>> Amvl Nit (Allen)
Abortion (Habitual) >>>>> Apis Mel (Credit to Clarke)
Premature Labor >>>>> Aurum (Anshutz)
Miscarriage >>>>> Vib Op (Boericke’s interest)
Abortion (Uterin Displacement) >>>>> Vib Prun (Clarke)
Prevent Death During Delivery >>>>> Cimic (Clarke)
Pus Infection >>>>> Arm m, Gun Powder
Tonsilitis >>>>> Psor 1M (Allen)
T.B >>>>> Tub 200, Bacil 200, Dros 30
Poliomyelitis >>>>> Carbolic Acidum, Plumb 10M
Poliomyelitis >>>>> Physostigma 200 (Opinion of Weir)
Poliomyelitis >>>>> Lathyrus 1M

Dr. W.K. Bond (M.D) stated that he used Lathyrus sat 1M, approximately on 100 of children and reported back only 1 patient with polio.

The best method to find the preventive medicine in any epidemic disease is to take all important symptoms of at least 10 patients, who are suffering from some epidemic disease. The remedy which will come after the peculiar symptom’s scrootiny, will be considered as Preventive for healthy persons.

As for as Specifics, Constitutional or causations are concerned. Wait and see next mail

Just remain a witness only

--------------------

Treating a patient with evident symptoms is Labourer’s Work
Preventing symptoms from breaking out is Architect’s Work.

Dr.MAS

drmas@pakwatan.com
drmas@homeoweb.net

[ 20. November 2002, 05:16: Message edited by: DR.MAS ]

NOSODES PRESCRIPTION:

Other method of prescription are Intrinsic Nosode Therapy or Autonosode Therapy and Foreign Nosode Therapy or Heteronosode Therapy.

Nosodes are indicated particularly for dyscrasia.

NOSODES are preparations produced according to homeopathic processing technique from bodily constituents and metabolic products of human or animal origin, further, from micro-organism including viruses, as well as their components or metabolic products, which are no longer infectious or virulent.

It is believed that during Nosode treatment all other therapies can be reinforced effectively. But no authentic data available.

Administration: Never prescribed Nosode according to the symptomatic similarity. For example, a diphtheria nosode (Diphtherinum) would not be administered for acute diphtheria, but for cardiac disease where similar symptoms are present, as in the case of heart damaged by diphtheria (=symptomatic similarity) or for cardiac disease where there is diphtheria in the case history (=anamnestic etiological similarity)

So, those who are prescribing Influenzinum during Influenza are wrong. My opinion is Influenzinum should be given to healthy person only before acquiring Influenza disease and for effected Influenzic epidemic persons, give remedies according to their symptoms.

Some are mentioned below (I will search for their descriptions)

Adenoma mammae
Adenoma prostata
Adeps Suillus
Anthracinum
Appendicitis
Arthritis urica
Ascariden
Asthma-Nosode
Bacillinum
Bacterium coli
Bacterium lactis aerogenes
Bacterium proteus
Bacerium pyocyaneus
Brucella abortus Bang
Calculi bili
Calculi renales
Carcinoma bronchium
Carcinoma hepatis

[ 20. November 2002, 05:23: Message edited by: DR.MAS ]

<BLOCKQUOTE>quote:</font><HR>dorothy gardner has sent this infor
Hello: busy reading all, then checked with the mfg. of homeopathic remedies. Spoke to someone at product information regarding the remedies for antrax. Was told there is none. the remedy recommendated Does Not fit the ailments that are being caused by the present antrax breakout. Read your MM and see what you think fits. The name of the remedy suggested sounds a little like the name of the powder hitting parts of our country. but it DOES NOT FIT and the mfg. does NOT recommend it.(even tho panic has hit and many people are ordering it to have on hand. Maybe a few shots of Ignatia is what we need now to calm all. At 85, I've learned to question everything that is told to me and then I do my own checking on the situation. Easy does it folks. God bless<HR></BLOCKQUOTE>

This statement may be helpful to my previous post. Nosodes are recommended for healthy persons (1st priority) and then in chronic case if badly needed.

thats BOLONY DR. MAS
there are rules
the lew of similarity....thats it.
now we can talk of what is similar or similimum or.... but the rules are ruls, and you dont precribe upon miasms , or anything else, and there is no one remedy for one condition....
read Hanemen and Kent again DR.
oh my god.

Just click on this link

Smile releases tension.
http://www.geocities.com/toon27us/

[ 21 October 2001: Message edited by: Dr. Cartoon ]

Ilan Yousab!

My next topic was on Miasm. But you ordered me to read Hahnemann and Kent first.

O.K on your order, I just started reading kent.

Dr. kent said in his preface of book “ These lectures were delivered in the Post Graduate School of Homeopathy and published in the journal in somewhat in REVISED FORM …… They are not intended, in any sense, to take the place of the organon …… (lectures are only commentary)”

What I have derived from this statement. Dr. Kent is trying to tell us that he has revised all his opinions, which he presented in front of his students during classes before handing over his lectures for printing book, i.e You may find some confliction between the lecture which are in the FORM of printed book and lecture which were delivered during class.

Second point, which I followed from the above mentioned statement that Dr. Kent’s lectures are only commentary on organon. He said organon is the authority and not his lectures. Dr. Kent said my lectures are only my personal opinion, for which you can disagree.

Let’s see what happened when a student came to Dr. Kent and said to him “I have taken all the symptoms of patient and it took me 2 hours to sort him out” Please tell me the remedy. Dr. Kent said “ You are the foolish person of the world, took two hours to take symptoms. Your first written symptom was so peculiar and important that you wasted your time for rest of the patient’s symptom.” Dr. Kent prescribed one remedy to him. The student said “Dr. Kent , but you said in the class that always prescribe your remedy on totality”. Dr. Kent said “I have revised my lectures”. In this case Dr. Kent went inside his room and came back after five minutes and prescribed the remedy. This incident is the part of history.

Now I am reading his first paragraph of his first lecture printed in the book……

[qutoe] It may be said that, up till the time of Hahnemann, no principles of medicine were recognized, and even at this day in the writings and actions of the Old School there is a complete acknowledgment that no principles exist.
The Old School declares that the practice of medicine depends entirely upon experience, upon what can be found out by giving medicines to the sick.
[/quote]

What I understood from above mentioned para. There is no principle (some how rules) exist. Practice of medicine (Methods of Prescriptions and rules) depends entirely upon experience, upon what can be found out by giving medicines to the sick, i.e, some time you will prescribe on symptoms, sometime on miasm and sometime on drug picture or name of disease, all these are clinical experiences.. These methods were found by giving medicines to the sick.

Now, may I read more or finish it here.

If you so for not read Dr. Kent, please click on this link
http://www.homeoint.org/books3/kentlect/lect01.htm

My only question is for you “ARE YOU TOTALLY AGREE WITH THE CONTENTS PRESENTED BY DR. KENT IN HIS LECTURES” Give your answer in YES or NO.

Now good bye, I have to write some points on Miasm and ill effects of vaccination

ILL EFFECTS OF VACCINATION

Ant Tart… For bad effects of vaccination when thuja fails and sil is not indicated
Apis Met… Sudden puffing up of whole body after vaccination
Bell… Fever with inflammation of skin where vaccinated.
Crotalus Hor… Post vaccination eruptions
Malandrinum… Dry rough skin remaining for years after vaccination
Mezereum… Eczema and itching eruptions after vaccination
Sars… Blood purifier after vaccination, removes itch eruption from face and skin
Sep… Effect of vaccination similar to symptoms of sepia
Sil…Abscess or convulsion after vaccination (Thuja)
Sulph…Ill effects after vaccination similar to sulph symptoms
Thuja…Bad effect of vaccination, immediate or remote effect. Collapse, convulsion.
Thuja…Whooping cough after vaccination
Vaccinum…Growth of scar tissue after vaccination, which develop to cheloids or ulcers.
Variolinum…against small pox

[ 20. November 2002, 05:38: Message edited by: DR.MAS ]

Dr Mas,
I am getting so many letters about what is a remedy for Anthrax and Smallpox due to the happenings at the Pentagon and NYC.

I have never seen either one first hand, however would imagine much would have to do with the stage and the symptoms.

If I had children or was concerned, I probably would have Ars, Bryonia, Apis & Rhus Tox on hand.

What is your experience or opinion on this? Many with small children are very concerned. Would you write on this subject and perhaps can forward this page?