How else should I define homoeopathy?

Has anyone ever been able to prove what is in the Organon correct or incorrect? Maybe one day when I finish my studies, I will be able to confirm that it is correct.

As I stated in one of my earliers posts (you did read them, right?), sixth edition. Hahnemann continually developed them after years of careful scientific study. I will start with the latest edition and work my way back if I cannot prove what is in it. However, this will take a long time. After all, Hahnemann had a wife to look after his house and he had no other work to do, like I do. Thus he could devote his life to this work. I, unfortunately, cannot.

I cannot say for sure, as I did not know him personally. Perhaps because he disproved his own theories and/or improved on them, from time to time. Perhaps he found better words in his language to say what he wanted to get across. Just as we edit our posts, so Hahnemann edited his text. But, I cannot say for sure. Can you?

Really? Julian is producing a new edition of the Organon? Wow. I only knew of a new translation of the fifth edition Organon.

Are there any hints as to which aphorisms Julian has amended/deleted/inserted?

Anything on dry/liquid dosing?

[ 02. October 2002, 08:26: Message edited by: Simone ]

__________________
Regards,<br /><b>Simone H</b><br /><br /><i>Aude Sapere</i><br /><br />"Never be a passive listener or learner" ~ Christian Gottfried Hahnemann

Dr Salim

Can you provide proof that there is no difference between dry dose and liquid dose?

Because some people on this BB have complained that they are sensitive to one or the other? Are you saying they are liars?

Do search on BB, you will find these posts. Then you can tell me which are lying and which telling truth!

[ 02. October 2002, 08:28: Message edited by: Simone ]

__________________
Regards,<br /><b>Simone H</b><br /><br /><i>Aude Sapere</i><br /><br />"Never be a passive listener or learner" ~ Christian Gottfried Hahnemann

Dr. salim,

You are very right in your opinion. Hahnemann did not close the doors of research. Organon is a guide line and not spiritual book. It is the detail which hahnemann experienced. If you gather new information, which is not in organon, it does not mean that you can't adopt or practice.

Tablet and dilution at the time of administration of medicine have equal effect on the body. Simone is a student and talking about written information. I am talking about the clinical experience. I have no doubt. My clinical practice is mostly based on tablets. It does not mean that I can’t claim homeopathic doctor. When she will come in practical field, then she will realize that talking about homeopathic philosophy is an easy job but treating a dying patient with homeopathy is quite difficult. She has already admitted in another thread that most practicing homeopathic personalities are not following organon.

Hence most are not homeopath beside calling themselves homeopaths.

There are a huge number of practitioners of homeopathy in the world. Are they not homeopathic doctors? Some of my favourites are

http://www.homeopathyvancouver.com/c...titioners.html

Dear Simone we can’t prove dynamised process. How can you say the medicine has been dynamised. Any reference? It is just an observation and experience about dynamisation. dear student simone, actually we can’t prove it scientifically.
Disagree with Hahnemann is a healthy approach. His aphorisms are based on experiments and their results. Read the preface of organon. Where he emphasized upon experiments. When you will disagree you will perform an experiment. You might get new information. Hahnemann himself first disagreed with Cullin’s approach about Cinchonna’s action on malaria and discovered this beautiful system of medicine.

YES! Read the following para

Here we means homeopaths. Remember! It is not written in organon.

Dear Simone,

You are right in your opinion. A true homeopath is that person who will follow organon strictly. 294 is not the end of lesson. New things are coming all the way. Homeopaths are experiencing new information. George Vithoulkas, Sanakaran, Murphy etc are not they claim the designation of homeopath? They have added new facts and information. They gave a new direction of understanding Organon . All are based on their experiences.

I apologise that I cannot comment on more points raised but time is short, however I would like to thank Simone for her posts & in particular for drawing attention to Aphorism 272 in 6th Edition Organon.
While Simone may be a student herself, she refers to the work of Hahnemann himself who I don't think anyone would call a student, & therefore like many of those who are posting comments Hahnemann was treating clinically also.

best wishes

Moira

I did notice much more favourable responses in our shelter cats when we switched from dry dosing to liquid dosing. I am very pleased with the results.
Did not 2 French scientists do that a while back while studing the wonderous water molecule? I haven't heard anything since, perhaps their experiments were proven unreliable in the end? just asking....

Good to see simone has come to her track. Now she is not claiming that she is a student.

__________________
<b>All the best<br />Khokhar<br />(CAM Expert)</b>

Where did I say I was not a student?

As far as I am aware, I said that I had clinical and/or practical experience, this does not mean that I am not still a student!

[ 04. October 2002, 06:20: Message edited by: Simone ]

__________________
Regards,<br /><b>Simone H</b><br /><br /><i>Aude Sapere</i><br /><br />"Never be a passive listener or learner" ~ Christian Gottfried Hahnemann

My dear Simone,

Did you get this clinical and practical experience without ever qualifying a certificate in homeopathic field. Have you been practising quackry?

__________________
Dr. Inam Ullah Mirza, DHMS, MD, Ph.D
Member National Council for Homoeopathy *NCH*
& Chairman Research Committee
Ministry of Heatlh, Govt of Pakistan

I don't know what's going on here. What is the point of discussion? If Simone is a qualified homeopathic doctor and she has a geniune degree too in the relevent field of homeopathy then what is the fun in trying to decieve members on this board. Why is she emphasizing on declaring herself not a quaualified homeopath but rather a student of homeopathy? When did she qualify DHMS or BHMS or any other authentic course?

__________________
Dr. Inam Ullah Mirza, DHMS, MD, Ph.D
Member National Council for Homoeopathy *NCH*
& Chairman Research Committee
Ministry of Heatlh, Govt of Pakistan

Deleted, because it is irrelevant to this discussion.

[ 04. October 2002, 07:29: Message edited by: Simone ]

__________________
Regards,<br /><b>Simone H</b><br /><br /><i>Aude Sapere</i><br /><br />"Never be a passive listener or learner" ~ Christian Gottfried Hahnemann