APPROVED POLYCHREST REMEDIES

S.No. Name of Remedies Proved By

1. Aconitum Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

2. Arsenicum Album Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

3. Belladona Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

4. Bryonia Alba Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

5. Calacaria Carb Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

6. Capsicum Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

7. Carbo Veg Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

8. Causticum Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

9. Chamomilla Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

10. Ferrum Phos Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

11. Gelsemium W.M.E. Payne

12. Graphites Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

13. Hamamelis Hering

14. Heper Sulph Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

15. Ignatia Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

16. Ipecauanha Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

17. Kali Carb Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

18. Lechesis Hering

19. Lycopodium Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

20. Mercurius Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

21. Natrium Mur Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

22. Nitric Acid Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

23. Nux Vomica Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

24. Phosphorus Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

25. Phos Acid Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

26. Pulsatilla Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

27. Rhus Tox Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

28. Sepia Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

29. Silicea Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

30. Sulphur Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

31. Thuja Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

32. Veratrum Album Dr. Samuel Hahnemann

33. Zincum Franz

After reading this mail. Several questions came into my mind. At least two hundred years are passed. As stated above, Samuel Hahnemann proved 29 out of 33 polychrest remedies. When there were no modern facilities available for proving remedies. Inspite of this verity that 99 remedies (approx) are in Samuel’s credit. All the world were against him. They pushed out Samuel out of the country. He had no resources to establish some place for research.
Now we have all the modern resources and equipment. But not a single polychrest remedy has been included in this century, rather any remedy which we can present to public that this is the new discovery of this century.

Samuel discovered and proved 99 remedies which all have excellent results and scientific data, inspite of non availability of apparatus, equipment and peoples interest.

It is not true that Samuel all proved remedies on himself. A man of old age can not afford these type of massive proving and experiments.

Which technique Samuel adopted for proving? Just think on this point you will get the answer within minute.

Time was short for samuel hahnemann
No facilities were available
Peoples were against Samuel pathy
Government and Officials were against samuel
No body was supporting to samuel
Samuel was a poor mans
Samuel had no money for research
Samuel gave very comprehensive and detailed proving of every drug including polychrest and frequent
Samuel was weak
Samuel was in his old age

But Samuel was a ......

Hi sammy
Good to see you back after all the years.
I know—you could not have proved Gelsemium, as you had no clue of its powers at the time. Just, in case you are looking for your old case notes and proving protocol’s, you have to go to Stuttgart to the foundation place. They kept them for you there and would be dying to see you and ask you a few questions. And stay away from these theories will you! No more insulting Alopaths !!

__________________
cure by symptom similarity!<br /><a href="http://www.Boger-Boenninghausen.com/" target="_blank">www.Boger-Boenninghausen.com/</a>

Hai hahnemann,
happy that you are incarnated again.
you introduced many polycrests and detailed MM s true.Your proving is the best proving and you are the best observer ever.But alas hahni the new trend is to see what you not seen and theorize than observation.Your sulphur is entirely different from modern writers.They have got different themes that you wonder.You are against speculation but homoeopathy is now paradise of speculators.The theme they found ,you will wonder,the delusion they are in and make you will in a world of fantacy.Now the whole picture of MM is built from one or two delusions or mental picture.You correctly knows that the man is not mind alone and you had given apt importnace to every symptom.So in this world of imaginative fantastic homoeopathy you are not needed.So please return to heaven where you get peace and eternal happiness.Parden me dear sir if felt hurt

__________________
<a href="http://www.pannakkal.com" target="_blank">www.pannakkal.com</a>

Samuel, mon cherie..
M. Pannakkal is quite right, you really must come home.

If you continue to brag about your achievements, I really will have to tell them the truth about the research in Paris.

As I said many years ago, "good deeds done in secret are such a treasure to a heart which has the right to be proud of them, that neither the praise of the world, nor the glory, otherwise so agreeable, resulting from the knowledge of these good deeds, can compensate for the loss of that secret enjoyment.

"This applies all the more to woman who by the law of exclusion, which man instituted against her, constanly finds opposition, which makes it impossible for her to give expression to her intellectual capacities...

I was born with an extraordinary character whic manifested itself in early childhood......

I was always learning and trying to enlarge my circle of knowledge, for knowledge is power. There are individuals born with a vocation.

Do you not remember your words to me before you left this mortal coil? " I have chosen you among all my disciples and I leave you my scientific heritage which is of such importance to humanity. Continue to work as we have done for such a long time, carry on mission, you know Homeopathy and you know how to cure as well as I do."

....well.....I did just that...

Hurry home mon cherie.......

PS If you want to read more about what they wrote about us, there is a wealth of knowledge in Richard Haehl MD's 2 Volumes on your life & work

[ 04 March 2002, 07:07: Message edited by: M d'Hervilly ]

__________________
Melanie

Hi Every one,

It is good question put forward by Dr. Samuel Hahnemann himself. I thought on the same points and some other questions came to my mind after reading your questions.

Generally, homeopathic remedies proved on healthy persons. How did he (Hahnemann) get healthy person, when patients were forced not to approach him for their treatment. Even in this modern world not a single person will present himself for proving medicine. The question is very tricky and interesting. I should appreciate to Hahnee. We generally believe that every person in this world will come again. I welcome to Hahnee I have many questions in my mind. Which I wanted to ask to Hahnee. Now your 2nd birth given me opportunity to get clarification of those conflicts.

Please answer it your self.

__________________
<b>Lady Dr. Meena</b>

Dr. Hans,

Thanks for reminding me…. Actually Mr. Organon proved so many remedies that I do not know at what time Mr. Organon proved which remedy. I believe that the doctors, like you, will take Mr. Organon’s pathy overseas. I visited you site. Keep it up

Dr. Pannaklal,

According to the philosophy of Hindu’s named “AWAGOON” the people may get rebirth, may be in the form of any creature. So Mr. Organon is 2nd birth of Homeopathy. I visited your site. You are good contributor to my pathy.

Dr. M d'Hervilly,

Thanks for your kind words and information. I am grateful for you. Oh my Lord!!! My Paris. Only Paris accepted me, when I was expelled from Germany.

Lady Dr. Meena,

It is an amazing question that how did Mr. Organon find healthy persons, when unhealthy were not available. I am impressed with your approach. Sky may be the limit. But my opinion is by saying SKY. Hence, you gave the limit. My spot is Imagination is the limit of improvement. Madam I may be wrong.

My dear colleagues,

Bells are ringing, this is the high time to accept the challenge. Time was short at my time and time is short now. We should be quick. Let us join hands with the www.homeopathyhome.com members. Make this website a junction of homeopathy. The unhealthy condition of peoples is alarming. We must work hard.

My dear doctors and members,

I put forwarded a question. I want to ask you how Mr. Organon carried out proving in limited time and resources.

----------------------
(Born, the 11th April 1755 Died, the 2nd July 1842)

It is my habit to read maximum posts on the net, whenever i visit this site. I read your post today. You provided us oppourtunity to find answer of many questions. I am not knowledgable person. Your questions are logical and to the point.

This is great shame for homeopathic community. That we did not add any single polychrest remedy. I have ready many good thoughts by great doctors. But they are all seem to be fail here.

Most of the doctors of this time have no practical work. They only read books and not involved in practical exerimentaiton. Secondly they are not interested that other should also engage himself in such experimentation.

Thanks for taking pain and provided us click for thinking...

I have to agree wholeheartedly with Pannakkal's assessment of modern homeopathy, which has become so confused that 10 different homeopaths will look at the same case and come to 10 different conclusions. Aphorism 3 states:
Discerning the disease or mistunement of the life force is difficult when these become confused with personality traits and other manifestations (and even circumstances) that are not part of the symptom picture. Instead of simply looking at what is going on with the patient (the expression of derangement), practitioners engage in all manner of analysis, interpretation, and inference to arrive at their conclusions.

[ 25. September 2002, 02:27: Message edited by: Tomi Conner ]

This is a very serious thread, that I needed badly. "Thank you!" to all contributers here. I wish and hope for this discussion to go on, and all participate here.
Shoshy

__________________
SHOSHY

Thanks Shoshy,

Still I am interested to know. How Dr. Samuel Hahnemann carried out such a huge list of proving?

Why we are fail to do so.