to All
it should be borne in mind, that Kent replaced the methode used in the Organon(homeopathik), through a system based on generals, particulars, peculiars and commons, as well as combinations of them.Kent proclaimed the superiority of the mentals(introduction to the use of the repertory). Later''homeopaths'' came up with even more complex modells and systems like Sankaran, Scholten , Sehgal,Ortega,Pashero. It would fill a book alone to present all the different now available systems.
I suggest that we should discuss Hahnemann first and then move onto Boenninghausen, Lippe, Farrington, Allen to Kent and so on.
What I see up to here in this threat is rather confusing and a mix of different systems.
hans

__________________
cure by symptom similarity!<br /><a href="http://www.Boger-Boenninghausen.com/" target="_blank">www.Boger-Boenninghausen.com/</a>

Thanks Hans,
Please - then, could you tell me more??!!

Hope you see this soon ,

__________________
"The significance of a fact is measured by the capacity of the observer."
Carroll Dunham

Hallo Lisa
Hahnemann's Homoeopathik:
Read the theoretical part of the chronic diseases, in order to spott important symptoms.
Boenninghausens: treatment of the whopingcough, the treatment of the intermittend fever, are great inspiration in the area of Astma, colds and coughs.
Jahrs: Clinical instructions,diseases of the skin(eczema!), as well as 40years of practise gives a good idea about the common diseases.
Taking it from the par, 153: it is helpfull to know, what is common to the disease first and then it is no big deal to see what is uncommon and peculiar, and therfore individual to the case at hand.
Hans

__________________
cure by symptom similarity!<br /><a href="http://www.Boger-Boenninghausen.com/" target="_blank">www.Boger-Boenninghausen.com/</a>