Oh Thanks God! You develop some soft cornor. It’s a good sign. You were going absolutely right for aida’s complain, but slightly changed your mind by saying that RT might be produced symptoms in just double dose of RT in 200 c. So I keep you on track by just asking a question and not giving ruling that you are wrong, infact I am wrong.

When this mock concepts will travel with us then these will produced hindrance and impediment in our homoeopathic system.

This is the concept, I wanted to clear in my post. Which none of the member did not understand and given hilarious remarks. If that post taken seriously to understand than Ricky and you never say “ Potency is now producing symptoms”. I know it happen sometime that medicine in the form of potency could produce some symptoms. But how, where and when??????? Please ask me. If you are interested.

These are the questions, which I asked in my mail titling “Homoeopathy and Potency”

Is it possible in homoeopathy…….. a remedy in the form of POTENCY (e.g may be China 200) ……..
WHEN GIVEN TO A ……..
1. patient whose remedy is not China……..could produce same China's peculiar symptoms as mentioned in our Materia Madica (MM) ……..
2. patient whose remedy is not China could produce some new symptoms…….. which were previously not proved during the proving of China in crude form……...
3. Healthy person, could produce same China's peculiar symptoms……...
4. Healthy person, could produce new symptoms which is not proved so for.……..

What’s wrong with these questions? These are questions, which were commonly asked to me by my students of BHMS. In my opinion, every practitioner of homoeopathy should have clear-cut idea of about these questions. Other wise in my opinion he/she is not a homoeo dr. But I have observed that peoples not showed courage to give simple answer to these questions. Yes I appreciate Chrisg for his courageous thought. If rest of the members, took action in the same manner. We might come to the conclusion effortlessly.
But actually likening and dislikening were started. So I moved back and got surrender purposely. My aim here not to distress someone. But to provide reflexive touch to every member’s mind. So that they could start thinking based on experimental results and not on old books thoughts, which may be wrong.

I am giving you only example here. You can easily understand.

When Samuel Hahnemann was translating culin materia medica. He saw sentence that Quinine is effective against malarial disease due to it bitter taste and astringent.

Samuel Hahnamnn strongly criticizes him and with the help of experiment he proved his judgment or view. Now I ask the question to why he strongly criticizes culins verdict or subject. Who has given him the authority to give judgment in right or wrong?

Whether culin was not an authority? Whether he was an idiot person. No! No! If Samuel hahnemann has selected his book for translation then it means that that book had some status in medical profession.

Dr. Samuel Hahnemann’s reflexive thinking able him to discover a new era in medical profession in the form of Homoepathy.

Why he did not backup culin??????

Dr. Mas
I have yet to hear you reply to Aida! or help for her.