For Oldstyle Homeopathy 101;

A homoeopath studies all the data related to the constitution, temperament, aetiology, miasms, suppressions and their signs and symptoms in the chronological order of development (aph 5.6.7.8).

All the probable causes, befallments, miasms, suppressions, drugs, immunizations, traumas and their symptoms are reviewed in the order of their appearance.

This information is needed to study the phenomena associated with the laws of cure as expressed by "Hahnemann and Hering".

If the totality of the characteristic symptoms points clearly to a well proven remedy it is imperative to give the simillimum at once.

The very fact that the vital force can express the disease state through constitutional symptoms shows that no one aetiological layer demands individual attention. To give a remedy that has an idem relationship with any one supposed causation is counterproductive and potentially disruptive to the natural symptom pattern. In such a condition an intercurrent is NOT NECESSARY, and therefore, contraindicated.

The half Homeopaths often ignore this prime directive because they do not understand the relationship between causation, constitution and symptomatology.

__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein

Quote from Gina:
The half Homeopaths often ignore this prime directive because they do not understand the relationship between causation, constitution and symptomatology.

It is also because they do not understand homeopathy.
Hahnemann called them the mongrel sect

__________________
Do not accept or reject anything before you have investigated it and that on its own merits.

For Oldstyle-
Quote by oldstyle:"Herings "law" remains nonsense as stated. It implies the numerous empirical phenomina which we don't see............................................... .................................................. ......................"
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"CHRONIC DISEASES AND THEIR HOMEOPATHIC CURE" by SAMUEL HAHNEMANN-

The Subject Is Syphilis-I am using this as A perfect example of how Hering Law of cure works-

the Allopathic physician(or the pseudo homeopath) destroys this chancre, by means of corroding, cauterizing and desiccating substances, wrongly conceiving it to be a sore arising merely from without through a local infection, thus holding it to be a merely local(external) ulcer, such also it is declared to be in their writings.

They falsely suppose, that when it appears, no internal venereal disease is as yet to be thought of, so that when locally exterminating the chancre, they suppose that they remove all the venereal disease from the patient at once,

if only he will not permit this ulcer to remain too long in its place, so that the absorbent vessels do not get time to transfer the poison into the internal organism, and so cause by delay a general infection of the system with syphilis.

The Allopathic doctor destroys in his blindness, through local applications, the vicarious external symptom (the chancre ulcer), which kind nature intended for the alleviation of the internal extensive venereal general disease; and so he inexorably compels the organism to replace the destroyed first substitute of the internal venereal malady (the chancre) by a far more painful substitute, the bubo, which hastens onward to suppuration; and when the Allopath, as is usually the case, also drives out this bubo through his injurious treatment, then nature finds itself compelled to develop the internal malady through far more troublesome secondary ailments, through the outbreak of the whole chronic syphilis,

and nature accomplishes this, though slowly, (frequently not before several months have elapsed), but with unfailing certainty. Instead of assisting, therefore, the Allopath does injury.
-----
John Hunter says:] "Not one patient out of fifteen will escape syphilis, if the chancre is destroyed by mere external applications",

and in another passage in his book he says: "The result of destroying the chancre ever so early, and even on the first day of its appearance, if this is effected by local applications, was always the consequent outbreak of syphilis."

Just as emphatically Fabre declares: "Syphilis always follows on the destruction of the chancre by local (or topical) applications.

How, then, could physicians, despite of all these facts and testimonies, close their eyes, and ears to the truth:
that the whole venereal disease (syphilis) was already developed within, before the chancre could appear, and that it was a most unpardonable mistake to forward the certain outbreak of the syphilis, already present within, into the venereal disease, by driving away and destroying the chancre by external means, and thereby destroying the fair opportunity afforded of curing this disease in the easiest and most convincing manner,

through the internal specific remedy, while the chancre was yet fully present! The disease is not cured except when through the effect of the internal remedy alone, the chancre is cured; but it is fully extinguished, as soon as through the action of the internally operating medicine alone (without the addition of any external remedy) the chancre is completely cured, without leaving any trace of its former presence.
-----

__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein

"tendonitis -> cracked finger-tips"...

That is like saying that 'freckles are the rusty ends of steel nerves.'

__________________
Do not accept or reject anything before you have investigated it and that on its own merits.

I will like to add my experiences of curing cases of tongue cancer with Kali cynatum I have four cases in record

please do so...........................................drpks inha

__________________
"Great ideas often recieve violent opposition from mediocre minds"...................Einstein

I didn't read all of this, and I was annoyed that the original poster didn't quote Hahnemann or anyone I consider Hahnemannians -- not that I noticed from scanning it. However, I was particularly annoyed that a couple advocates of allopathic medicine and the natural sciences as they're presently understood made a lot of very ridiculous remarks. Chuckling, I'm sure they impressed the less-well informed readers, but I constantly wanted to barf about the stuff that came out their mouths that properly belongs coming out the other end. Yeah, for real, and it's always like that with those guys. They're trying to defend total quackery that's now actually admitted by allopaths. Sure thing, Jethro. I guess you guys impress some people, but not me, you fools.

Okie dokie, guys, I dare you to make those statements to me one at a time. The allopathic emperor doesn't have any clothes on, so watch what happens when these guys try to claim they're not butt naked. This should be fun.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B