The most important part of the homoeopathic science
OR
in other words the essence of the homoeopathic science which has been neglected ,unrecognized and most importantly ununderstood by almost everyone in the science
actully, the fact is

THE VITAL FORCE IS A SCIENCE AND NOT A PHILOSPHY that is what the master wanted to explain to his followers
i want to know this from my family members(ALL THE HOMOEOPATHS)
when the topic of VITAL FORCE COMES
JUST ASK OUR LOGICALY REASON GIFTED MINDS
DOES VITAL FORCE HAVE ANY RELATION WITH THE PHISIOLOGY
DOES IT HAVE ANY RELATION WITH THE PATHOLOGHY?
DOES IT HAVE ANY RELATION WITH THE MEDICINE
if yes,
THEN HOW WOULD THE CORELATION OF PATHOLOGY AND PHISIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
HELP IN PRESCRIPTION OF SIMILIMUM
ALL THESE QUESTIONS WOULD BE ANSWERED WHEN DR AMARSHINA NIKAM'S BOOK ON THE VITAL FORCE WILL BE PUBLISHED in POLAND.
AS
VITAL FORCE IS OXYGAN.

Hope that book will be available soon.
sajjad.

That's not true. It's a thing, not a science or philosophy. While the vital force is perfectly understandable in scientific terms and is certainly as obvious as can be since death proves it exists as well as most things about physics, things are only part of science or are referred to as being scientific if they're either (1) provable by scientific method and -- very importantly -- lack erroneous assumptions skewing and corrupting scientific method or if they're (2) driven and ordered by natural laws specific to some study. By far, things fitting into the former very large category of scientific information constitute "studies of" (or -ologies of) something: biology, anthropology, paleontology, gastroenterology, cardiology, oncology, toxicology, physiology, pathology, virology, bacteriology, histology, etc. -- lots and lots of them. The latter and more-important category of scientific information constitute the 4-5 pure sciences because natural laws intrinsic to and unique to some aspect of Nature order and drive that information: mathematics (arguable either way as a pure science), chemistry (the Science of Matter), physics (the Science of Forces & Energies), legitimate homeopathy (the Science of Medicine) and the Brotherhoods' Philosophy & Cosmology (quite off the scale compared to the other four). Vital force is neither of those things precisely because it's a thing, not a study of something or a pure science. However, I suspect the fact that English is not our speaker's native language impinged upon what s/he wanted to say.

Hold on! I ain't no follower, pal, and neither should anyone else be about anything. Hahnemann and subsequent Hahnemannians had and we still have colleagues and students, but there's no place for followership mentalities in homeopathy, period. That's just gets you "teacha tole me" krap, and that won't go anywhere since there's no knowledge involved in such nonsense. What if I go, "Bubba Braindead, one of the many supreme morons of the entire universe, said that we're all animals even though no animal has hemispheric lateralization of the brain and other stuff constituting the 10 Qualities of Mind"? Are you going to believe Bubba Braindead or the Truth? It makes no difference who says Truth, either. There's thus no personality worship with people who love Truth, so don't use that word, please.

Yes, and how could it not?

They don't because pathology and therapeutics are two completely separate and wholly unrelated subjects.

If that's what he says, I'll be sure not to read it and wonder why you believe it. Explain away, sir.

Sir or ma’am, you made a heap of mistakes there, but I don’t have time to correct them all. The fact that you have the right motive and know that allopathic medicine is extremely if not wholly flawed in both theory and practice shows that you’re on the right track, but I can’t correct every single error that passes my way. Good luck, and

God bless!
[/B]

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B
www.GiggleBoggleJabbleGooby.com/HaHa