Hello forum members,
I have just designed a webpage that touches upon most topics presented in this forum. It has to do with health and disease; with information about homeopathy, stating that it is the only true cure.

I respect the members at this forum and would appreciate it if you could look at the website and tell me what you think.

It is Luke's Links

Very Respectfully,
Luke

Luke's Links

I very much like that you utilized the Kunzli et al. translation of the ORGANON because it's the only one we should quote, but I wish you'd stipulate it like this: "- [remove that dash] Samuel Hahnemann[,] The Organon of Medicine [italicized], Sixth Edition, paragraph [Article] 2. [remove that period] (Kunzli et al. trans., 1982) [no period]

They are not paragraphs; they're articles. The reason they're numbered has to do with the fact that paragraphs of PhD dissertations were then numbered for ease of reference and criticism by those who'd evaluate them, but those paragraphs subsequently expanded in later editions and are now called articles. We see that in Hahnemann's dissertation from 1812 within THE LESSER WRITINGS OF SAMUEL HAHNEMANN beginning on page 569 (link: The lesser writings of Samuel Hahnemann - Google Books) so as to be able to teach at the University of Leipsig. Actually, I should say that as far as I know, they originally were paragraphs, but I've never seen the 1st, 2nd or 3rd editions of the work because those holdings in university libraries within the United States have all been destroyed over the last 150 years by either allopathic zealots or careless and ignorant librarians. I simply know this from what others have said, but I find them to be unimpeachable sources. After receiving his PhD, he had to supply a book for students to read because that's how they did it then; i.e., you taught from your own book. He used his paper titled "The Medicine of Experience" (1805) as the template for the first edition of the ORGANON. You'll find that equally brilliant work beginning on page 435 of THE LESSER WRITINGS.

Special note cometh. The translators of THE LESSER WRITINGS made a super-bozo mistake in the footnote on page 569 leading from the title of his PhD dissertation. Those low-potency pseudo homeopaths ("mongrels," Hahnemann constantly called them) said that he wrote it "in order to obtain the license to practice [medicine] . . ." Wrongo, daddyo! He received that in 1779, and THE LESSER WRITINGS was presented to him on the 50th anniversary of having obtained his M.D. thanks to the approval of his clinical preceptorship under the court physician to the King and Queen of Saxony. That seems like something the translators of this book should have known, does it not?

You then say:

A Homeopathic Physician [homeopathic physician] is not a Naturopathic [naturopathic] physician. Homeopathy has nothing to do with chiropractors, osteopathy, herbalism, acupuncture, massage therapy, [delete that comma] or any other [so-called] "alternative" health practice.

Homeopathy is a [one of the few pure] science[s due to the fact that natural laws order each of them.], and [When stipulated like that, you have a new sentence here, so delete the comma and "and."] [It] was brilliantly discovered by Samuel Hahnemann in the late 1700s [in 1790 while translating William Cullen's Materia Medica [italicized] and disagreeing with something that principal demagogue of allopathic medicine said about Peruvian bark. Peruvian bark is the source of quinine, with which allopaths treat (not cure, mind you) malaria. Hahnemann therefore drank that vile stuff and rediscovered homeopathy because it produced all of the symptoms of malaria, then called intermittent fevers.] Homeopathy utilizes medicine[s], [delete that comma] but in a completely opposite way [from] than [delete "than"] [so-called] "traditional" [medicine] doctors prescribe [delete "doctors prescribe"].

Hahnemann discovered (through decades of scientific research) [Through decades of scientific research, Hahnemann discovered] that when a person is exposed to a toxic substance, which causes disease symptoms, that substance can be used to create a cure.

My reactions:

No, those aren't disease symptoms; those are poisoning/proving symptoms. Just delete the word "disease" from that clause, for it will confuse people to stipulate it. Other than found in the three previous forms of homeopathy, this was the Gordian knot of therapeutics finally untied after thousands of years, but you've failed to represent how important it was. Everyone knows that poisons produce symptoms, but they never connected the dots and realized that Nature doesn't allow two similar natural diseases to simultaneously exist in the same organism. As such, we essentially throw a similar artificial/medicinal disease into a person, and we keep pushing at it with increasing potencies until it completely displaces the natural disease. Fortunately, the medicinal disease doesn't remain because these are dynamic influences with ultramolecular medicines that only impart a force, not chemical reactions. That is to say, the medicinal force initiates chemical reactions seen as curative reactions, but it's done by etheric forces, not chemical reactions. That's my analogy of using a cloud instead of a sledge hammer to cure. Medicinal effects of a person's simillimum or "thing most similar" (the beneficial ones being actual counteractions of the vital force -- accurately, one's etheric energy pattern) consequently wane, and the effects of that final dose virtually aren't even noticed once a person is fully cured for the same reason that several doses are required to begin a self-proving, so we cease throwing that drug into them. In essence, that's cure.

This goes on and on, but I don't have time for further evaluation and correction. Be sure you get it right, sir, for karmic debts accrue from misleading others for the simple reason that we wouldn't want that done to us.

God bless!

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

Albert,
I am excited to know that you have taken the time to look at my website; it is a work in progress. I have corrected the first section of my homeopathy page, thank you, your guidance is very appreciated.

I am sure that you will agree with the health and disease articles and blogs that I will be posting. Please take an occational look at them and (if you have the time) add your knowledge to the subjects presented in the comments or on the forum page. Your knowledge is necessary for awakening people about the dangers of iatrogenics.

A writing class will be a worthy investment, and one I intend on making; I have stayed away from the classroom and spent the past 5 years unraveling the riddle called disease. I am grateful for any corrections and comments; however, I will not add information that I cannot personally extrapolate on, such as "due to the fact that natural laws order them". I know that homeopathy works (from personal experience) but I am neither a homeopathic physician nor a scientist, and I have a somewhat limited knowledge about the subject of homeopathy. I will not be teaching people how to practice homeopathy and will attempt to point them in the direction of "classic" homeopaths (avoiding both low and high potency pseudopaths).

I know what causes and what cures disease, and it is simple to understand, this is what I am attempting to present to the masses who are convinced that disease is difficult. Most people have been brainwashed and overloading with information to confuse them.

Thank you for explaining exactly what happens in the healing process of homeoapthy, it is the best explanation I have found and exactly what I was looking for.

The information I am presenting is intended to spread the awareness of the subjects; I am not offering any treatment or medical advice. It is simply a sharing of knowledge which will hopefully (at least) keep my karma balanced; your oppinions about the subjects are one of the few that I respect, so please let me know if you think differently.

Respectfully,
Luke

Not quite. This:

Samuel Hahnemann, The Organon of Medicine, Sixth Edition, Article 2 (Kunzli et al. trans., 1982)

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B