hi every one:
I am an MD doing right now general surgery since 5 months, I come to know homeopathy four years ago, so I started to study by my self and to practice it for service purpose, all the people that I treated them get benefit and amazing results which can be considered as a miracles in allopathic medicine happened in front of my eyes, so I am in love with homeopathy since that time , but I have a great conflict in my mind between doing a specialization in the Allopathic medicine or just study homeopathy without doing any specialization , MY question :
I am asking for professional advice from professional homeopaths and alternative medicine practitioners ,if I really need to do any specialization in allopathic medicine before learning homeopathy and practicing it professionally , and if I do need to do one what it should be ?, of course that is all based on my dream and my goal of becoming a professional homeopath first of all.
please I am asking for real help here, because I am one of a very very few people who know about some thing called HOMEOPATHY in my country especially in the medical society, when I talk to doctor friends of mine they really think that I am losing my mind !!
they can not accept or even understand the principles of it.
thank you all
DR. EZZAT

As a patient who was essentially abandoned onto a scrapheap by Allopaths and only thanks to a dedicated Homeopath did i at least recover my health even if not fully but hopefully eventually Hahnemannian444 will manage that for me I would say qualify in both Alopathy and Homeopathy then other Allopaths will have no reason to scorn you and every reason to face up to the possibility that there are better ways to treat illhealth

I have a total distrust of Allopathy in all its forms as now do my family although sadly too much damage has been done by allopaths and surgeons years back that its hard for any Homeopath to turn things around now

Surgery and emergency medicine are the only proper provinces of allopathic medicine, so you chose well, but the need will always be in question if homeotherapeutics wasn't first sought by experts at it and especially since most of them involving diseases are tacit failures of allopathic medicinal therapies pursued for years without cures. The basic idea is to get to them before their pathology reaches such stages. Of course, surgery will also involve longevity because our bodies wear out, so we would hope you also act well as a surgeon and involve yourself in such concerns. If there are other areas of allopathic medicine that are defensible, somebody correct me.

More particularly, Guernsey was a surgeon, obstetrician and master homeopath (always posthumous). Read his wonderful papers in old homeopathic medical journals, sir, but your best current portal to the world's Hahnemannians is the ZKH, a German journal.

God bless!

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B

I know some eminent cardiac surgeons who save the lives of patients in emergencies by performing the required surgery and shift to homeo therapuetics once the emergency is over.

The formal training in modern medicine does help in understanding the common symptoms of the disease, and help the homeopath to discount them and look for the uncommon symptoms that individualise the patient.

So if someone really wants to pursue homeopathy seriously after a formal education in modern medicine, that should be welcomed.

Murthy