Quote:
Originally Posted by DenisGibbon
When I first encountered Homeopathy back in the sixties, I gained the impression that the primary purpose of repertorisation was to find a single remedy that most closely matched the TOTALITY of the patient's symptoms, the 'similimum'. Many years later, I discovered that in practice, Homeopaths most ordinarily ony included a relatively small number (7-8) of what they considered the most significant rubrics in their repertorisational analysis.In the first prescription for cases of serious chronic disease, would it not be more appropriate and beneficial to the patient to do an exhaustive repertoriasational analysis which would include as many rubrics as were evident in the case?Thank you,
|
Only a smallish number of Rx, classed as polycrests, have been extensively proved with the majority of their Sx known. If you Rep the whole lot you will restrict yourself to those polycrests. The Rx you require may well be a "small"Rx with not an awful lot of Sx written into the rep.Reputedly about 50% of known Sx have not been written into the rep, so Rep by* itself is not the 100% Rx finding system. It's essential to read up the MM of each likelyRx in as many books as possible. Put your greatest weighting on #211, the STATE of the disposition.#210 might help you too. All the best. Derek Briggs*(Retired Homeopathic Dinosaur)