I my self can thus made up my own law and say that I can sing an Elvis song in front of the patient, then the symptom will jump ship and go to find another person close by to infect. This means , I just sing a song, then the disease just simply transferred to the person next to the patient. Does any logical person think, that my law is no more valid than "Hering's Law of Cure" ? Why would "Hering's Law of Cure" be more valid than my law ? Anyone can throw something here ? The amazing thing about homeopath and psychics and the likes I have noticed that laws and claims are made up as to fit certain, hypothesis, which has no factual based at all. Now homeopaths, I will try and invent a law about singing Elvis song (Viva Las Vegas) for a patient that will cause the symptoms and the disease to go away and find another host (human).
Go back to school and learn to spell properly. then follow the rest of the education and maybe, just maybe, we will talk to you again. If not, just leave and spill your garbage elasewhere, like Randi's website. There you will be welcomed with open arms by equally ignorant fools.
__________________
Do not accept or reject anything before you have investigated it and that on its own merits.
|