I talk in riddles and circles? I’m so much in your face about things that it disturbs most people, but there’s no choice where life and death are concerned, for any compromises of the Truth in this realm endangers life and sanity and precipitates chronic diseases (of which psychiatric maladies are a part). Likewise, I bend over backward to avoid being ambiguous and am an extremely precise person. I therefore reject that characterization of my writing. Maybe you don’t enjoy how I endeavor to have fun no matter how serious a subject.


Okie dokie. Hahnemann said it best at the very beginning of homeopathy on p. 241 of THE LESSER WRITINGS in the closing passages of a letter to a German Royal, passages we‘ve come to call “The Good Family Physician.” The relevant passage is where he advises choosing a physician “who is not silent respecting the merits of his colleagues.” Most people miss it, but that necessarily also includes their lack of merits because life and sanity are at stake. We do not, however, like to break up this wonderful description of the character of the physician (the only one I know of), so attend to those passages relevant here and be amazed by what are probably the first words in homeopathy:

“Search for some plain man of sound common sense [UCD = unnecessary comma deleted] who takes great pains to ascertain the truth of all he hears and says [emphasis mine] [UCD] and does not merely look to its passing muster, who knows how to give clear and condensed information respecting everything that belongs to his art [UCD] and never obtrudes his opinion unasked or at an improper time, and who is no stranger to everything else important for man as a citizen of the world to know [emphasis mine]. More especially[,] let the man you choose be one who does not show temper nor get angry [UCD] except when he beholds injustice, who never turns away unmoved from any except flatterers, who has but few friends but these men of sterling principle, who listens attentively to the complaints of those who seek his aid [UCD] and does not pronounce an opinion [i.e., does not prescribe] without mature reflection, who prescribes but few, generally single, medicines in their natural state, who keeps out of the way until he is sought for, who is not silent respecting the merits of his colleagues [nor, by implication, their demerits because life, health and sanity are at stake – stipulation mine], but does not praise himself; a friend of order, quiet and beneficence.

“And when, my prince, you have found such a person, as is not so very difficult now-a-days, no one will rejoice more than

Yours, etc.,
S.H.

“PS. One word more! Before you finally fix on him, see how he behaves to the poor [UCD] and if he occupies himself at home unseen with some useful work!”

It resulted from an unknown German prince asking Hahnemann what to look for in a personal physician. The prince was, however, secretly looking for the best physician in the world to cure raving insanity in Duke Klockenbring of Hanover (apparently not a pseudonym, unlike what I’ve previously posted here because it’s such a goofy name). Hahnemann was asked because he was the leading medical historian, scholar and translator of the day as well as a leading pharmacologist -- called medical researchers today. In fact, his PDR-like reference was the standard work of the day. In short, everyone in medicine knew who Hahnemann was, so he got asked this question. Hahnemann got the job the next spring and cured the duke. To this day, psychiatrists still can’t cure any psychiatric maladies, big or small let alone the most difficult of them all: schizophrenia. The case report that immediately follows these passages is magnificent in the extreme. I have dozens of very long footnotes that explain passages and comment on others. Read it, and I’ll easily explain anything you don’t understand. It never ceases to amaze me that the very first published case report in homeopathy is very possibly the most difficult case.

Of course, his extension of the life of Prince and General von Swartzenberg (or something like that) would rank higher even though the man didn’t live because we are today so frequently asked to lift people out of the grave after allopaths have abandoned people to die, but Hahnemann didn’t publish it. He instead got blamed for the man’s death and was forced into exile. Everyone is complicit in mass murder by simply patronizing or merely listening to allopaths, so try to tell me why we should not despise everyone and not allow them to destroy themselves and their Souls as intended by prophecies to free this planet of the 12 billion low-grade Egos who’ve made it Hell on Earth for the past 26,000 years and finally leave it only accessible to reincarnation by Saints so as to precipitate the Kingdom of God on Earth by November 2998. Personally, it’s a problem because they all obviously have to go, and even the three sets of Higher Beings want them gone. We can only attempt to preclude the destruction of 12 billion Souls by providing them information that allows them to increase their mentation, but so few accept such gifts and attain class-A thinking status of clear and independent thought. You have to test everything and hold only to what proves good and true, but most of humanity is totally servile, complacent, selfish, ignorant, brainwashed and brain damaged (from premature cutting of the umbilical cord) for us to expect the under 1% of class-A thinkers to increase. As it is, were there not special provisions in place to assist those who ignorantly opt to embalming, those 12 billion low-grade human Egos are going to be total loses. Nonetheless, the fact remains that they have to get off of this sacred planet of life, and it could only happen by their own hands and ignorance of the truths of existence, so we can’t change that except in the few who’re ready for the complete reformation of personally entrenched views necessary for the assimilation of Truth, for it’s quite obvious that mere class-C and class-B thinkers (90% & 9%) are satisfied with endlessly wrong conclusions from a few basic erroneous assumptions. They like being followers and leaders who mislead, and they‘re all bottomless karmic pits unwittingly resonant with Hell. All we can do is attempt to increase the mentation of others by providing information that allows them to do it themselves, but 99% of humanity clearly likes endless half-truths and lies, so I simply don’t care anymore since it’s impossible to care about people who don’t care about themselves. Wisdom 101.

So, of course I’m critical of all other therapists because they’re self-admitted quacks unable to cure 99.999% of the deadly diseases in industrialized societies, who further admit they create all of the chronic diseases and psychiatric maladies they can’t cure and finally admit that they kill all of their patients. People are so brainwashed that they don’t even notice these three astonishing admissions. That’s just pitiful and pathetic. We’re witnesses to the mass murder of nearly 100 million people every year. Don’t talk to me about being critical. If it were up to me, and if we were even remotely civilized, all other physicians and everyone in the power structures would be burned at the stake! Why don’t any of you people have a sense of social justice, anyway? You can’t claim ignorance at the proverbial Heavenly Tribunal, for God is not unjust, and we judge ourselves, anyway. Six and one-half billion people are in serious threat of losing their Souls this lifetime, and it will continue until the other half have also transitioned through their last lifetimes. When societies eventually adopt the 9 ancient Laws of Economy, all of those people will be immediately exiled as criminals, and everyone else will have to live with the legacy of nothing but criminals in their family tree. That’s just pitiful and pathetic, so I prefer to avoid it all as a homeopath.

Article 52 of Hahnemann’s ORGANON OF MEDICINE makes very clear that all other therapies are just part of hydra-headed allopathic medicine:

“There are only two principal therapies:

"The first, based in every respect exclusively on the exact observation of nature, and on scrupulous experiments and pure experience – the homœopathic method, never wittingly used before me, and

"The second, which does not do this: the allopathic (or heteropathic) method.

“They are directly opposed to each other, and only someone who does not know either could be fool enough to suppose that they could ever approach each other or unite, could make himself so ridiculous as to treat homœopathically one moment and allopathically the next to please his patients. This is a criminal betrayal of divine homoeopathy!”

As for the so-called tissue salts, everything about them is allopathic. You’re only familiar with people who use our drugs in allopathic ways, so you don’t know anything accurate about homeopathy.

Finally, I don't like you quoting Hahnemann one bit since you obviously don't yet understand either his thought or that of any Hahnemannian, so stop it, please. The footnote says that we don't need people endlessly engaging in sophistries and obscuration with allopathic prattle, so stop it, please.

PS. I simply posted these two out of order, so fix it.

__________________
Albert, also Hahnemannian444B