Quote:
Originally Posted by Anna Bryant
Dear Dorothy
I don't know what remedies you've tried, but if you have some books on homoeopathy, you could look at Caust and NatMur.
Also, this is not a full case you have posted. In order to offer more accurate suggestions, it would be necessary to know a full health history, including family health history and your general character and major events of your life etc.
Since you are so sensitive to remedies it might be better for you to take remedies in LM potencies in future. These are gentler.
|
Anna usually has good things to suggest, but don't think that LM potencies make any difference since nobody actually makes them given that nobody produces the little micro-globules necessary to do so, and the notion of potency having anything to do with effects only leads you away from finding the simillimum ("thing most similar"), which could cure the growl off the skowl of a grizzly bear. Cute, huh?
You find the needed remedy and leave it alone because it precipitates magical effects put right into the very fabric of space by God at Creation through unknown fundamental forces of nature that nonetheless precipitate according to absolutes we call the four Laws of Cure or, more accurately, the four-part Law of Cure. The needed remedy always stands out when you find the uncommon symptoms of a case because they're small symptom rubrics (lists, Jethro, and get a dictionary, Clyde) since they're strange, rare and peculiar symptoms by definition. Crossing the list of three or more of them gives you a handful of possibles, and you simply find the one most similar by checking the actual statements of symptoms in the reliable and untampered-with materia medica.
You have to increase the potency until cure holds. It's that simple. Don't use homeopathic drugs (homeopathics, and correct your dictionaries, Jeeves) in allopathic ways, though, or you'll do nothing but make yourself a walking proving of all the drugs you've insanely thrown into yourself.
Self-medicating homeopathic patients are like monsters with 80 heads. You see the moronic George W. Bush in them because they ate Veratrum album. You then see the anxious George Washington in them because they also ate Aconite. Then you see the two-face and lecherous used-car salesman named Bill Clinton pop up because they ate Lycopodium. Then appears the indignant moron named Ronald Reagan because they also ate Staphysagria. Suddenly, out pops a two-headed monster at the same time when you see the evil Bill Gates and monstrously evil Thomas J. Watson (the founder of IBM) because the idiot also threw Nux vomica into himself. God help us if they took Sepia, for those witches sometimes kill their children. If they ate Anacardium orientale, here comes another Hitler.
Get the picture? These are not harmless medicines, and all allopaths mindlessly saying they're "innert and innocuous" is only another of seventy-twelve gazillion demonstrations of total quackery and idiocy by pseudo physicians and pseudo scientists. If you keep taking them and other than one dose at a time and await curative effects running out (and can you judge that with no knowledge?), you’re guaranteed to look like a cartoon in thought, manner and deed. Who can love an 80-headed monster? Leave them alone, and throw them down the toilet for the cockroaches to eat, because abused homeopathics are no better than cra*.
Hehe. I beat them to the editing this time, and what’s wrong with the word cra*, anyway? I’d like to throw some cra* at idiots who want to tell me that the word cra* is bad for humanity. Who says so, Cra* man Jack? That’s cra*! Who needs word Nazis, anyway? Go back to the dark side of the Moon, please.