I’ve drafted papers on this a number of different times over at least 15-20 years, but I prefer to not look at that material until I feel more comfortable with my understanding of the issue, for I invariably just get entangled into reading them and adjusting them over many hours without significant changes. These are just a handful of the core facts involved in homeopathic pharmacology for your consideration without any real organization of them.

----------

Because we use ultramolecular drugs, the answer to our pharmacology clearly lies in understanding what is meant by non-physical or etheric particles and the congregate etheric pattern they form as inorganic substances and organisms. Physicists have admitted to these and to major manifestations of them for over 20 years, so it is the same inductive logic they are applying that we will be forced to accept as our explanation. The reason for this is that no physical apparatus can directly detect etheric substance; we can only induce conclusions from effects via general principles about the “multi-dimensional” nature of existence forced by admission to there being non-physical particles and thus to the existence of the Æther, which is the same thing as the Ætheric Plane of existence. It is for this reason that we will forever be quoting Hahnemann and subsequent homeopaths about this no matter how more scientific our explanation becomes.

I'll give a stab at naming as many of these non-physical particles and effects as come to mind, for I’ve practiced at it for about 15-20 years since I figured this out. The most important of them are virtual particles. The mistakes about virtual particles by physicists are irrelevant but similar to those about tachyons, another one.

Tachyons are theorized "phantom photos" [edit to: "phantom photons"] said to "accompany photons" or light particles. That's a mistake. They don’t accompany light particles; they are the same substance, only they’re out of phase or not en rapport with themselves as photons due to their nutating [sic] at a higher rate on a consequently higher plane of existence than their positions as quantum particles of electromagnetic radiation, but they all coincide in exactly the same space. These were, I believe, the first of the 20-odd etheric particles and universe-wide field effects that physicists semi-universally accepted. The reason for their conceptualization and identification as well as for their being named is an enigma called the wave phenomenon of the propagation of light. It's been long known that photons disintegrate into a wave form due to their bucking the speed barrier inherent in the physical universe called the speed of light. It’s therefore perfectly logical that they would go poof into a wave form. What remains inexplicable without tachyons as a "binding force" pushing them back into particulate form (assuming one can speak in such terms about quantum particles of electromagnetic radiation without going crazy) is why they would then just as quickly collapse back into particles. OOps! they said; there is a missing part of the model. Thus came tachyons.

Dark matter is another manifestation of this insane and ridiculously still materialistic model of the universe after having admitted to non-physical particles. The amount of matter in the universe cannot account for the gravitational force observed. OOps! another hole, they said. Thus was borne the concept of so-called dark matter. They are just etheric particles, all of which affect physical matter but only indirectly since physical and etheric matter and energy are simply out of phase with each other and therefore cannot ever directly interact.

Before I proceed, consider what I believe to be the First Question of the Physician: A man dies and something's gone; where was it? Not what was it; the name doesn't matter. It obviously coexisted in the same space as the physical organism, for everything physical remains at death. Where it existed being obvious, the deeper questions come about who we are as beings, what we are, what other things are, how this and that and other stuff. I say this because everyone intuitively knows the answer to the question since it’s obvious, and every child can understand that something left at death. This basic observation about the nature of existence is part of what makes Kent's First Lecture in his LECTURES ON HOMEOPATHIC PHILOSOPHY so important, although they quickly thereafter go down hill into manifold errors. Kent is a whole other subject, but there are at least eight major categories of natural phenomena proving higher planes of existence that are just ignored by materialists. Death is only one of them.

The vacuum energy of empty space is another recent addition to the list of non-physical particles. I don't remember exactly who, where or why this was conceived, but it is another doozy and universe-wide form of etheric or non-physical particles widely accepted today. It starts to get really nauseating to hear them yak-yak about such things but miss the basic conclusion of multiple planes of existence forced by acceptance of non-physical particles. They hedge-hog around it by calling them parallel universes and other meaningless nonsense like multiple dimensions, but we can safely ignore such ignorance as speculations to eventually grow cobwebs like their other materialistic mistakes. Anyway, these of course are conceptualized etheric quanta rather than subatomic particles, but it is the same effect since they aren’t physical but are nonetheless admitted to.

DeBroglie was a Nobel laureate who developed the concept of the subquantic medium. I don't, however, remember why he developed it.

Einstein's cosmological constant is another. I believe that he conceived of this as a safety valve since the mechanistic model he was working within was apparently perceived as having insoluble problems requiring some “basic substance” (which is synonymous with the Æther) within which everything moves and from which everything arose. This conceptualization was seemingly a byproduct of physicists dismissing the Æther with the development of electromagnetism in the 1880s from Rutherford’s experiments and the subsequent development of quantum theory by Planck 20 years later. That is to say, the guys thought they’d figured it out through a materialistic and mechanistic model of the universe, so out went the Æther. Einstein came along a short time later.

By the way, it was Newton’s Ætherial Medium they dismissed, and he was the epitomal mechanist. Poof! Just like that, a bunch of bozos nonetheless decided it was fantasy. You gotta love people with such elaborate sophistries, for they can argue that apples are oranges and convince everyone. Now they’ve got to accept the Æther, for that’s all non-physical particles could be.

Chiu and H.C. Dudley simultaneously developed the concept of the neutrino flux and neutrino sea. Neutrinos have a half-life near infinity. It turns out that nobody can account for all of the neutrinos that have been created by stars since the hypothesized Big Boob (errrror too). We walk around in a sea of neutrinos that pass right through us, for there are 10 to the 11th power of the little buggers in every cubic centimeter of space. Lots and lots of the thingies create a sort of energy sea. I have forgotten what makes them part of this equation since they are physical particles, but it’s in there somewhere.

Blackbody radiation is another. I used to be able to explain what this stuff is but no longer. It is one of those universe-wide field effects, I think, that remains kind on the edge of explanation. Some bigger brain please explain it here.

Cosmic microwave background radiation is another major effect somehow requiring non-physical particles or otherwise being a manifestation of them. Cosmic rays lose energy to the surrounding space in traveling the vast intergalactic distances and then, for some reason, go poof into the cosmic microwave background radiation.

That loss of some unknown energy by quantum particles is, incidentally, the mechanism by which photons spread in wavelength. It’s not because the universe is spreading. T'wernt no Big Bang, folks, and the universe is only 7½ billion years old, not 15 or more.

Quintessence from String Theory is another one. That’s one involving the “primordial matter” conceived of as existing within black holes. Don’t overlook how similar is the term primordial matter to basic substance. I never could wrap my brains around how they ignored that one, but a friend with depth knowledge of modern theoretical and particle physics recently told me that it is obviously synonymous with etheric particles. It made me smile to hear that, for I don’t often have renewed faith in academics.

Worm holes is another form taken on by acceptance of these non-physical particles. We all saw this dramatically represented in Carl Sagan’s movie Contact. I had some correspondence with Carl over a number of years, but I never got the impression that he accepted what I said since he invariably found counterarguments for anything I put forward. Then he would not listen to me when I discovered he had cancer, and he of course soon thereafter died. As usual, that was a tragically premature loss that should make us all cringe and water that it still happens.

There are more examples of non-physical particles and their major manifestations, but that’s enough. The point is that academic science has finally admitted to immaterial substances. What a surprise; that’s exactly what Hahnemann called our stuff.


So about the four above names, James H. Stephenson, M.D., is the most important one. He hypothesized about our pharmacological enigma with tremendous brilliance and insight in a few papers during the 1950s and ’60 [edit: '60s], saying that some force or non-physical particles (don’t quote me there, for I think it may have been a hole in his theory) underlying the matter of our medicines forces the water and alcohol molecules into polymers or “polymeric matrices.” Polymers are molecules formed by single atoms that like their opposite and variously polar ends so much that masses of them bond into three-dimensional aggregates. Epoxies and plastics are polymers. Water and alcohol don’t, however, naturally do this. This is what people mean when they speak about “water memory.” This is, in my opinion, the most likely solution for our pharmacy, and it fits with what Hahnemann and Boeinghausen et al. have been saying over the centuries. Moreover, it matches up with what the Spagyric physicians said about their drugs. Unfortunately, nobody with the means has ever bothered to test his hypothesis. I feel that it could not be that difficult to determine whether or not water and alcohol molecules of our potencies form into polymers, but nobody has ever tested it. It’s going to change chemistry as a science if Stephenson turns out to have been correct, for there simply isn’t any other explanation possible for water and alcohol molecules forming into polymers after serial dilution and succession than that the etheric particles of the crude substance are doing it and are thus maintaining physical space without the physical substance being involved. Again, this is exactly what Hahnemann et al. have all said. Are you ready for the 25th century? It looks like it’s going to come a bit premature, for such a discovery will shake up chemistry and physics at their cores to have to admit to our etheric chemistry and physics. Yeehaw! I say, it’s about time two centuries and more after the fact -- i.e., the Hermetic physicians of ancient Egypt also clearly utilized our pharmacology, so it’s actually millennia and more after the fact -- so let’s get on with it, guys.

Fincke was an American homeopath of the 19th century who made lots of reliable high potencies. He wrote on his ideas about how they could be medicinal as ultramolecular drugs. I can find the reference if you like.

A few years ago, Dr. Lo published his photographs of nanometer-sized water crystals at room temperature resulting from succussed high dilutions. It was a total coincidence that he shook serial dilutions. Michael Quinn of Hahnemann Laboratories in San Raphael, California, by chance discovered this guy’s findings and wrote on it. Dr. Lo’s book has photos and a small amount of text of relevance to us. It is, nonetheless, the eighth of eight natural phenomena proving higher planes of existence because only etheric particles could be causing those polymers of water at room temperature. Neat, huh?

And William A. Tiller, [edit: Ph.D.,] is professor emeritus at Stanford University’s Dept. of Materials Science and Engineering who wrote several papers quite brilliantly on homeopathy and homeopathic pharmacology. He calls etheric particles in our medicines deltrons. Some minor mistakes in his explanations don’t bother me since I spot them, and he is definitely to be read by anybody looking into this subject with an eye toward figuring it out since he would have already considered many possible explanations.

That’s as much as I can muster about this at the moment. Go get ‘em, guy. We need a champion in chemistry.

[ 12. July 2003, 06:39: Message edited by: Hahnemannian444B ]

__________________
Albert, also<br />Hahnemannian444<br />#5904