Hans, I did not respond to your previous post in reply to mine because I felt and found that you were not sincere. You accused me of not knowing my statistics etc actually I am quite well versed in them. I simplified a lot and I used frequentism at that time to make it simple. However I found that despite all your credentials you presented you were disingenious in your post. Nothing that you had said had actually voided or answered what I had said. You said a lot and backed it up with all kinds of credentials and yet nothing was said.

This simple example is a case in point. Spectrum of a temperature / time data set is the amplitude / frequency graph and even a high school student studying physics would know that and yet you chose not to answer directly but instead you poured scorn on the author/researcher without actually clarifying the matter but only serve to confound and confuse the reader. Since you are one great and highly knowledgeable instrumentation engineer you would not spend a few minutes clarifying the matter.

So Hans, what gives ?

---Chiong