On Jan 10, 2008, at 2:03 PM, homeolist (AT) otherhealth (DOT) com wrote:

>
> I do feel rather uncomfortable that we reject trials that show
> homeopathy does not work, but leap on those that do, even if we can see
> their design is flawed.

Very true...
Ideally, we should examine those trials that seed to "show" homeopathy
not working, and see if we can tell what went wrong! Analyzing our
failures can be some of the BEST learning experiences!!!

>
> But my real question was either the trial is good homeopathy and so is
> hitler's usage, or both are bad. Which is it?

Definitely neither. The two situations are very, very different--did
my prior post explain that well enough?
Shannon
>
>
> --
> batakali
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> batakali's Profile: http://www.otherhealth.com/members/batakali.html
> View this thread: @ gimpy: proof of homeopathy
>
>