WHy does nobody say that for a really correct trial you would need to find a large number of people HAVING THE SAME DISEASE (to assure the standard of action, that is to permit a resonably good comparison with control - placebo) and NEEDING THE SAME REMEDY at the same time. This, given that any homeopath will say that the frequency of prescribing the same remedy even for people with different sort of complaints is not quite high to say the least - this is something that is being dismissed as far as I was able to ready any discussions, - is something it would be very difficult to do without support from a large number of homeopaths, maybe, or in any case, something rather difficult to deal with.

For obvious ethical reasons you would not want to suppress the condition in people with a superficially "similar" but unindicated remedy, if you are familiar with the homeopathic method enough to see this?