View Single Post
  #32 (permalink)  
Old 12th January 2008, 11:35 PM
broten1721@aol.com
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Re: @ gimpy: proof of homeopathy

PLEASE 8 emails from one person in 20 minutes is too many for me...thank you







-----Original Message-----
From: homeolist (AT) otherhealth (DOT) com
To: homeopathy (AT) homeolist (DOT) com
Sent: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 4:13 pm
Subject: [H] Re: @ gimpy: proof of homeopathy











"That is why the skeptics are always pointing to poorly designed DBCTs
that show homeopathy no better than placebo.

Occasionally the circumstances are such that homeopathy comes through
anyway. It is really a credit to homeopathy when it does well in a trial
with the deck stacked against it."

I think you may missing the point. DBCTs will not effect the efficacy
of any homeopathic remedy: what they do is compare the performance of
-remedy- versus -control,- while at the same time removing as much as
possible any extraneous variables that may affect the results
unneccesarily. If homeopathy works it will perform better than placebo.

regards

c


--
colmcq
------------------------------------------------------------------------
colmcq's Profile: http://www.otherhealth.com/members/colmcq.html
View this thread: @ gimpy: proof of homeopathy

Reply With Quote