Re: Re: @ gimpy: proof of homeopathy
Hi,
The question is NOT whether a SPECIFIC highly diluted/potentized
remedy works for a SPECIFIC condition - homeopaths will readily admit
that it very well may not do so.
The skeptics deny that those remedies can work at all!!!
In order to disprove that even one trial that comes out highly
significantly for homeopathy would disprove the skeptic's assertion -
just as only one black swan falsifies the assertion that all swans are
white (which is a standard example of what falsification means).
Regards
Luise
On Thu, 10 Jan 2008, homeolist (AT) otherhealth (DOT) com wrote:
>
> I do feel rather uncomfortable that we reject trials that show
> homeopathy does not work, but leap on those that do, even if we can see
> their design is flawed.
>
> But my real question was either the trial is good homeopathy and so is
> hitler's usage, or both are bad. Which is it?
>
>
>
--
One thought to all who, free of doubt,
So definitely know what's true:
2 and 2 is 22 -
and 2 times 2 is 2:-)
==========> ICQ yinyang 96391801 <==========
|