Last time I asked a rather delicate question on the list. He mailed me that he liked to help me. No name, no profession, no nothing.
So I didn't go into it. But I had the idea that the next thing he would be asking was, can you send me a photo of this woman and of her complaints. So I thought , could be a dirty old man. But now I think he could be looking for more ammunition??

greetings Bernard
and by the way, that patient from the question is doing well on only homeopathy. One tumor disappeared, now waiting for the next one.

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2008 18:06:36 -0800 (PST)
From: David King shot_info (AT) yahoo (DOT) com

My occassionally viewings suggest that these "skeptics" are quite obviously being sacastic - that these mutterings are taken in this forum as being the truth would amuse them greatly and no doubt provide them with even greater ammunition.

homeolist (AT) otherhealth (DOT) com wrote:

It s obvious that it is an orchestrated campaign to discredit
homeopathy.
Big Pharma is footing the bills, it is a pittance to them. Some of the
"skeptics" on the jref forum even admitted to it and explained how they
are paid.

I don't know how Gimpy fits into it, but he seems to be a minion of
Goldacre.


Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! MSN Messenger