He can be one of three things: a troll, someone playing Devil's advocate, or genuine.

It doesn't matter to me what he is, because he is helping me to perfect my writing skills. It's very easy to write and communicate with people who are like-minded but it requires more skill to deal with sceptics like him. Also, it enables me to do a lot of searching for info myself, which I probably wouldn't have the need to do otherwise, and communicate with other people that are opening doorways into new areas of thought.

The interesting thing I'm finding about the whole of this debate are the issues that he's leaving unanswered; that in itself speaks volumes for me.

Christine
www.dogsonholiday-uk.com
info not found on mainstream websites!
www.homoeopathyclassical.com
Samuel Hahmenmann's teachings

www.flickr.com/photos/pandeva/collections/
See my pictures - ENJOY!

----- Original Message -----
From: Kenneth Salls
To: homeopathy (AT) homeolist (DOT) com
Sent: Monday, December 31, 2007 1:26 AM
Subject: RE: [H] Gimpy: Merely a troll



--- "martha d." <tmrmartha (AT) hotmail (DOT) com> wrote:

> Limpy,
> I too have been following your posts with much interest. Pseudonym or not, you express yourself
> well and I enjoyed your dissection -- although not your dismissal -- of homeopathy, as you read
> it, of being unreliable and untrue.

>>>>

You're all falling for what is commonly termed a "troll" (someone who is
insincere and attempting to lure one into endless circular discussions for
"kicks").