Hello,

Although homeopathic effects are well observed and experianced by homeopathic community in millions but still mystry surrounds around scientific working of homeopathic "sub-avogadro” dilutions and these are interpreted as ultra-molecular, sub-clinical, placebo, blank, fake etc. These are usually hammered by powerful scientific/conventional/skeptic lobby on these grounds and we don't know its result anytime in future. Probably, homeopathic practices are allowed by regulating authorities due to "no or least adverse or toxic effects" expressed by remedies. But still "time lapse/waste" in getting right treatment can become a ground for discrediting homeopathy which may effects homeopathic practices anytime in future. If so, it can effect substancially to students studying very hard (just equal to regular medical courses), practicing homeopaths and also to patients. Homeopathy has two type of remedies:-

Molecular: lower potencies, where molecular presence of active/raw remedy substance is there in all preparation.

Energetic or Sub-avogadro: higher potencies, where molecular presence of active/raw remedy substance can't be there in all preparations.

Mostly, homeopathic effects are based on stimulation of physiological activities by enhancing molecular motions of bio-chemicals or bio-mechanisms--accumulated or otherwise inactive, with weak stumuli. Such effects are also indicated scientifically, as under:-

Arndt's l. , Arndt-Schulz l. weak stimuli increase physiologic activity, moderate stimuli inhibit activity, and very strong stimuli abolish activity. See also hormesis.

hormesis (hor·me·sis) (hor-me´sis) [Gr. hormēsis rapid motion] the stimulating or beneficial effect of small doses of a toxic substance that at higher doses has an inhibitory or adverse effect.

The above effects can be possible both by low molecular remedies and energetic remedies. But to prove presence of energetic information in higher potencies, may be beyond the understanding with current scientific technologies. Moreover, variations in scientific clinical trials on homeopathic effects also become another issue.

Under above thoughts and prevailing environment, can it be beneficial to divide homeopathic system into two parts based on above mentioned potencies?

To what extent, molecular remedies or lower potencies can still treat/cure the patients?

We can also think it in view of deep and long acting effects indicated for higher potencies which may, if capable scientifically, may probably cause some unreqired effects to survive under current environment where we may need some resistances, tolerances etc..

Best wishes.

__________________
Homeopathic & Biochemic system existed because Drs.Hahnemann & Schuessler thought differently.
Successful people don't do different things, they do things differently..Shiv Khera