otherhealth.com - View Single Post

sionep · #3 (**permalink**) 18th January 2006, 04:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by passkey

Why ddo we lways look for the latest and ignore our great heritage ??? .

[1]
CANCER LATENCY PREVENTION AND CURE THROUGH MIASHATICS
F J BRADLEY
"If improvement is to be brought about as in other branches of knowledge, we must diverge from 'the beaten tracks, the probability being that the truth is to be found in unexpected directions. But not only is any divergence from ordinary views likely to meet with opposition, owing to the preconceived opinions of mankind, but it has to encounter a much more serious opposition should it at all run counter to existing commercial interests":
Dr R T Cooper "Cancer and Cancer Symptoms"
Basic to health and healing is the non-scientific concept of vitality. It is a quality that cannot, at the moment be-quantified. It is the essence of the homeopathy of Hahnemann and his system of miasmatics, for, if there were not a vitality working in accord with Hering's Law ...
[1] Hering's Law of Cure ~
I Symptoms move from center to circumference of body.
2 Symptoms travel from above downwards.
3 Symptoms travel from more vital to less vital organs,
4 Symptoms disappear in the reverse order of their onset, those that appeared first being the last to disappear.

1) "But not only is any divergence from ordinary views likely to meet with opposition, owing to the preconceived opinions of mankind"

I disagree here, science has moved on from being preconceived about a hundred years ago. Science is open minded but ONLY restricted within the framework that does not violate known established laws. The reason, it is restricted to the circle of known established physical laws, is that if you come up with a claim that breaks one of the known laws, then each and every law can be broken. This will lead to the collapse of understanding of the Universe. Since the foundations of how the Universe is govern by its own laws are quite solid at the moment, we see all emerging new theories time and time again sometimes lead to discoveries which already perfectly fits in or in harmony with the current theories, that is no violation there. That is , the new theories or inventions DO NOT at all contradict known established ones. The guiding principles of homeopathy do VIOLATE certain known established laws of PHYSICS. One obvious one is the "LAW OF IDENTICAL PARTICLES". This law cannot be broken, therefore the idea that water molecules acquire memory must be completely dismissed outright. Not even worth, of trying to prove it, because there is nothing to prove in there. WATER molecules are the same (or identical) to each other regardless if they are in low concentration or high concentration, period. Nothing more , nothing less. As far as Physics is concerned, water molecule 1 has no special privilege over water molecule 2, and that’s it homeopath practitioners, there is nothing to argue about or to be proved.

2) "Basic to health and healing is the non-scientific concept of vitality. It is a quality that cannot, at the moment be-quantified"

Again , this assertion must be dismissed outright altogether. The healing of what ? Healing of nothing ? No, it is the healing of a physical object called human or an animal. Yes , that's right those physical object are made up of WHAT ? They are made up of molecules and atoms which also made up inanimate objects like chair, carpet, toothpaste and so forth. Therefore the same laws of Physics that govern an 'iron' atom (chemical symbol -> Fe), in a haemoglobin molecule, is the same one that govern an 'iron' atom in a steel bar. The laws of Physics made no distinction at all between the 2 'iron' atoms, which embedded in 2 different objects (human or a living thing and a steel bar). These 2 different iron atoms will emit radiation at the same frequency, which follows that they obey the same law.

3) "Hering's Law of Cure"
Those laws from 1 to 4 are all garbage and rubbish. Only the suckers would believe such rubbish. In fact, I am starting see similarity in those laws between homeopaths , psychics and faith healers in which they preach to their followers. Do you have any experimental fact-based proof that the laws (Hering's Law) have been thoroughly tested and validated ? Why it should be dismissed completely is because it does make the 'symptoms' sound like they have conscious mind of their own? C'mon, is anyone is serious enough to accept this ridiculous claim or assertion? I my self can thus made up my own law and say that I can sing an Elvis song in front of the patient, then the symptom will jump ship and go to find another person close by to infect. This means , I just sing a song, then the disease just simply transferred to the person next to the patient. Does any logical person think, that my law is no more valid than "Hering's Law of Cure" ? Why would "Hering's Law of Cure" be more valid than my law ? Anyone can throw something here ? The amazing thing about homeopath and psychics and the likes I have noticed that laws and claims are made up as to fit certain, hypothesis, which has no factual based at all. Now homeopaths, I will try and invent a law about singing Elvis song (Viva Las Vegas) for a patient that will cause the symptoms and the disease to go away and find another host (human).