Quote:
|
Originally Posted by kayveeh
Can't we then say, all the studies, researches, discoveries, surveys etc. done by science people for science can be pro/biased and false as not yet endorssed by homeopathy or by other CAMs? Why you think, science stamp on their system and other systems should only be valid? If you can think that, that can be cheating or fraud, how all such studies, researches and discoveries done by science people for science can be tursted? Can't these be for some vested self interests?
So pls take stamp an endorssment of homeopathy on all such modernizations than accept, accordingly.
|
If I said that eating broken glass cured warts (random example for the sake of argument) and my friend said that he agreed, that would not be good enough. If my friend's friend said he'd eaten glass and had no warts, that wouldn't be good enough. If *his* friend claimed it was scientifically correct because the glass contained the memory of the reflection of his warts, that wouldn't be good enough.
If more than one independent, properly blinded study showed that eating broken glass correlated with a lack of warts, that would be enough to show interest.
If one person or group emerged with a hypothesis grounded in acknowledged science showing that glass granules in *any way* reacted with wart cells, that would be enough to show interest.
Science isn't a dirty word, and it's not a belief system. It's mostly just common sense...