Quote:
|
Originally Posted by moopet
For the sake of symmetry:
Scientific research is scientific research. Sometimes it's flawed, and sometimes those flaws take a long time to be corrected, but there's also a flaw in the argument above. Saying, "there must be something to it because so many people believe in it" is circular. One could equally say, "Why (have other) doctors, scientists, laypersons and their relatives not accepted homeopathic medicine, if they have noticed any positives during the last century?"
And
Why not? If you believe that the larger part of modern medicine is falsifying reports to discredit homeopathy, or at least taking the side of staunch conservatism, is that not the same thing?
Not trying to derail the topic, just trying to make it stick to the research part  |
Can't we then say, all the studies, researches, discoveries, surveys etc. done by science people for science can be pro/biased and false as not yet endorssed by homeopathy or by other CAMs? Why you think, science stamp on their system and other systems should only be valid? If you can think that, that can be cheating or fraud, how all such studies, researches and discoveries done by science people for science can be tursted? Can't these be for some vested self interests?
So pls take stamp an endorssment of homeopathy on all such modernizations than accept, accordingly.