View Single Post
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 27th November 2004, 05:35 AM
David Little
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Sulphur and Hepar Sulph as Intercurrents duringTreatment

Quote:
Originally Posted by Luise
I interprete this as meaning to differentiate between Sulphur and Hepar sulph. "according to the symptoms".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Luise
And as to the modification of "in tedious and complex cases" -- well, I guess in easy and straightforward cases (which should be rare for psora) the question would not pose itself.

You see it different?
Dear Luise,

It is quite possible that he is speaking of the difference indications between Sulphur and Hepar Sulphuris, which could include things like the affects of heat and cold, etc. He may also be speaking of noticing changes in the symptoms that indicate the need for the sulfates as intercurrents. I have seen cases in the Paris Journals where he used Sulphur and Hepar Sulphuris as intercurrents but not all the time by any means. Sometimes, there was definite changes in the symptoms that led him back to the remedy and at other times the reasons were not that obvious. Simple cases certainly don't need as many remedies as complex cases. According to Hahnemann, no miasm gets as complicated as psora.

Sincerely, David

Last edited by jonh; 28th November 2004 at 11:58 PM.
Reply With Quote