dear homeolist,
clarke mentions under natrum mur, that he gave nat.m 1M to a patient and there was aggr./proving. he gave nat.m CM and this cleared up the aggravated state ! this sounds unusual to me. I have read this kind of idea elsewhere as well and I do not understand it. I do understand if it is said that rhus tox in potentised form can remove the bad effects of a direct exposure to poison ivy, but I do not understand how nat.m CM can help when nat. m. 1M has created trouble. I would expect more aggr. if I did that.
any comments ?
dr manish agarwala